cshaun:
So $60 vs $125, but you have no toaster when it randomly breaks and you need to dispose of and buy a new one? I think I'd go the $125 toaster. That's a lot of hassle, time, petrol etc saved. Well any product could have a defect and fail at any time or even DOA. But put in a little quality control, possibly slightly better design and not much reason it doesn't last much longer. Maybe 90% make 5 years, so offer 2 or 3 year warranty and charge like $12.
Why would CGA be 12 years if warranty is 8? CGA is just what one would reasonably expect (subjective). CGA may still just be 8 years surely?
If you worry about time and cost and energy of a product fails, thats a worrying life.
A $10 toaster doesn't have quality control. Its in the mass cheap production market
CGA is based upon reasonable, a poster here years ago had an old but very expensive plasma fail well after warranty, maybe 6 years. It was dealt with. If it was a cheap and nasty TV with 12 month warranty and failed after 2 years, forget it. If a manufacturers offers an 8 year warranty, and the high price to go along with it, the quality and price might well determine a CGA period greater than the warranty
But if you feel that all products should last forever, figuratively, well, that's not how our world works. Not everyone can afford Rolls Royce products