Old Media rules the Web

Forums › Off topic › Old Media rules the Web

juha

1317 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

#13065 20-Apr-2007 12:46

NZBC says so.

The CIO story linked to in the NZBC blog post is a good read too, as it puts things into perspective. Odd place to publish it though, CIO.

Juha

freitasm

BDFL - Memuneh
79250 posts

Uber Geek

Administrator

ID Verified

Trusted

Geekzone

Lifetime subscriber

#67855 20-Apr-2007 12:58

Stupid blog tool they use... No link to their "home" so I can't check other posts. Therefore can't waste my time reading that blog.

Goodbye.

juha

1317 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

#67858 20-Apr-2007 13:08

It's Blogger... and while the logo's not clickable, there's this at the end of each post:

Home

Doesn't the Home link work for you?

Juha

freitasm

BDFL - Memuneh
79250 posts

Uber Geek

Administrator

ID Verified

Trusted

Geekzone

Lifetime subscriber

#67860 20-Apr-2007 13:17

Probably. Didn't see it. Not obvious. Poor usability.

Nightwyrm

588 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted

#67864 20-Apr-2007 13:23

the US figures are from June 2006 out of this article and I added The Guardian figures from February this year

Nitpicking I know but when posting graphs that provide comparisons, I'm not sure it's really kosher (or accurate) to use figures from 7-8 months apart in the same graph. For all we know, the NY Times may have had a larger readership than The Guardian in Feb 2007.

Wonder how the Herald rates...

Post-geek, opinionated mediaphile, and natural born cynic. Jack of all genres, master of none.

juha

1317 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

#67866 20-Apr-2007 13:27

While I can't recall the correct reader numbers now, Herald Online is doing pretty well - to the point that its advertising revenue exceeds Herald on Sunday.

Good point about using data collected at different points in time.

Juha

Nightwyrm

588 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted

#67869 20-Apr-2007 13:34

juha: Good point about using data collected at different points in time.

I'm a BA - it's my job to pick holes in other people's work.

Post-geek, opinionated mediaphile, and natural born cynic. Jack of all genres, master of none.

mike

307 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted

#67873 20-Apr-2007 14:48

"Old Media Rocks the Web" (original headline) may be right but "Rules" not so, compare any newspaper site to blogger, wordpress.com and livejournal or youtube to any major tv network site and you'll see they're all trailing citizen media.

And don't get me started on CIO linking their story across seven pages...

Equinox IT

Cloud spending continues to surge globally, but most organisations haven’t made the changes necessary to maximise the value and cost-efficiency benefits of their cloud investments. Download the whitepaper From Overspend to Advantage now.

juha

1317 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

#67874 20-Apr-2007 14:56

mike: "Old Media Rocks the Web" (original headline) may be right but "Rules" not so, compare any newspaper site to blogger, wordpress.com and livejournal or youtube to any major tv network site and you'll see they're all trailing citizen media.

Well, YouTube has content from the major TV networks, and I doubt it has the audience of the large broadcasters yet. I guess if you compare a single news "paper" (seems a misnomer that) site to a big bloghost, then yes, it won't have as many visitors. You could've just said "MySpace" in fact - that's probably the biggest of them all.

But the point is... the web is building old media's audience, not decreasing it. People want to get their news from journalists, and blog. Or do you get all your news from blogs then?

And don't get me started on CIO linking their story across seven pages...

Yeah, that was... excessive.

Juha