Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




659 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 144
Inactive user


Topic # 161811 20-Jan-2015 16:53
Send private message

http://www.stuff.co.nz/waikato-times/news/64937416/Whakatane-cop-not-charged-over-dog-shooting

I
 wonder what would happen in the exact same case with a civilian ? or if the bow and arrow was swapped with say an Air Rifle ?.

View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
834 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 260

Trusted

  Reply # 1218430 20-Jan-2015 16:58
One person supports this post
Send private message

If the facts were the same, then the same thing.  That's the thing about "thresholds"!

13577 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6362

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1218433 20-Jan-2015 17:01
One person supports this post
Send private message

Given that it was investigated etc then the answer to your question is no, they are not above the law




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 Mac user, Windows curser, Chrome OS desired.

 

The great divide is the lies from both sides.

 

 


 
 
 
 


3100 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1570


  Reply # 1218446 20-Jan-2015 17:13
One person supports this post
Send private message

Police are normally tougher on their own than the general public. So to answer your question...no.




Always be yourself, unless you can be Batman, then always be the Batman



12141 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3954

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1218480 20-Jan-2015 18:19
Send private message

KiwiNZ: Given that it was investigated etc then the answer to your question is no, they are not above the law


So the law says it is OK to shoot people's pets with arrows?







597 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 132


  Reply # 1218487 20-Jan-2015 18:29
3 people support this post
Send private message

Geektastic:
KiwiNZ: Given that it was investigated etc then the answer to your question is no, they are not above the law


So the law says it is OK to shoot people's pets with arrows?




Apparently so if the animal is on your property.




Regards
Stefan Andres Charsley

3100 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1570


  Reply # 1218488 20-Jan-2015 18:30
2 people support this post
Send private message

Geektastic:
KiwiNZ: Given that it was investigated etc then the answer to your question is no, they are not above the law


So the law says it is OK to shoot people's pets with arrows?




No, the law says that Police MUST consider certain criteria when deciding whether or not to lay charges, having reviewed ALL the evidence (not just that our sensationalist media choose to selectively publish or broadcast).

Actually, yes...in certain circumstances shooting an animal is justified.






Always be yourself, unless you can be Batman, then always be the Batman



2527 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 939

Subscriber

  Reply # 1218523 20-Jan-2015 19:31
2 people support this post
Send private message

Geektastic:
KiwiNZ: Given that it was investigated etc then the answer to your question is no, they are not above the law


So the law says it is OK to shoot people's pets with arrows?




In this case, the decision appears to be that it was legal to non-fatally shoot a potentially aggressive animal that had entered his property, not on a leash and not being controlled by a handler.




Windows 7 x64 // i5-3570K // 16GB DDR3-1600 // GTX660Ti 2GB // Samsung 830 120GB SSD // OCZ Agility4 120GB SSD // Samsung U28D590D @ 3840x2160 & Asus PB278Q @ 2560x1440
Samsung Galaxy S5 SM-G900I w/Spark

4649 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 470

Trusted

  Reply # 1218546 20-Jan-2015 20:06
4 people support this post
Send private message

The evidence is quite clear that to an extent the Police are above the law. That's just what happens when the agency charged with being their watchdog is internal.




Twitter: @nztechfreak
Blogs: HeadphoNZ.org


13577 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6362

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1218548 20-Jan-2015 20:09
One person supports this post
Send private message

NZtechfreak: The evidence is quite clear that to an extent the Police are above the law. That's just what happens when the agency charged with being their watchdog is internal.


So you have read the file etc from the inquiry




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 Mac user, Windows curser, Chrome OS desired.

 

The great divide is the lies from both sides.

 

 


3154 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 961

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1218558 20-Jan-2015 20:14
8 people support this post
Send private message

What was the demeanour of the dog? Were there any children on the property? Were there any fears for the safety of any persons on the property? How many days after the reporting of the shooting was the policeman asked about it? How often does this animal just roam the streets? How many complaints have there been about it? How often had the owner been dealt with by animal control? Has the dog been impounded before? What attitude has the owner displayed in respect of any of the previous? Etc... There's many, many giant holes in this story.

4649 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 470

Trusted

  Reply # 1218559 20-Jan-2015 20:14
Send private message

KiwiNZ:
NZtechfreak: The evidence is quite clear that to an extent the Police are above the law. That's just what happens when the agency charged with being their watchdog is internal.


So you have read the file etc from the inquiry


Oh I'm not referring to this case at all, there have been numerous cases in recent years where the Police have been given more leeway than regular citizens. 




Twitter: @nztechfreak
Blogs: HeadphoNZ.org


3154 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 961

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1218561 20-Jan-2015 20:18
2 people support this post
Send private message

NZtechfreak: The evidence is quite clear that to an extent the Police are above the law. That's just what happens when the agency charged with being their watchdog is internal.

What a load of utter rubbish. Take a look here: http://www.ipca.govt.nz 


13577 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6362

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1218563 20-Jan-2015 20:19
One person supports this post
Send private message

NZtechfreak:
KiwiNZ:
NZtechfreak: The evidence is quite clear that to an extent the Police are above the law. That's just what happens when the agency charged with being their watchdog is internal.


So you have read the file etc from the inquiry


Oh I'm not referring to this case at all, there have been numerous cases in recent years where the Police have been given more leeway than regular citizens. 


Oh OK




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 Mac user, Windows curser, Chrome OS desired.

 

The great divide is the lies from both sides.

 

 


3100 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1570


  Reply # 1218605 20-Jan-2015 21:08
3 people support this post
Send private message

NZtechfreak: The evidence is quite clear that to an extent the Police are above the law. That's just what happens when the agency charged with being their watchdog is internal.


This may be what the media portray, but having previously been in the force, I can say that in almost all instances that is simply a load of bollocks.  Police bosses take no prisoners when dealing with their own, and staff generally get a much harder deal than any member of the general public.  




Always be yourself, unless you can be Batman, then always be the Batman





659 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 144
Inactive user


  Reply # 1218620 20-Jan-2015 21:36
Send private message

scuwp:
NZtechfreak: The evidence is quite clear that to an extent the Police are above the law. That's just what happens when the agency charged with being their watchdog is internal.


This may be what the media portray, but having previously been in the force, I can say that in almost all instances that is simply a load of bollocks.  Police bosses take no prisoners when dealing with their own, and staff generally get a much harder deal than any member of the general public.  


Bit like Greg Carvell who had to spend $30,000 of his own money defending charges when he shot a machete wielding attacker in his gun shop. Although the self defence was legal, the police were salivating at the opportunity to gain some case law on firearms charges that they could use in future (a runner-up prize they were seeking).

Sure they could have let it go, but no they had to make an example.

Yet somehow we rarely see police made example of in all but the most extreme cases, half the time the system covers up or turns a blind eye.



 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.