Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


xpd

xpd

Geek of Coastguard
14115 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4574

Retired Mod
ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

#192156 29-Feb-2016 10:49
Send private message

Had bit of a giggle at Noel Leemings over the weekend..... wife killed her Lumia 520 phone, so off we went phone shopping. 

 

Pop into Noel Leemings Silverdale and in the doorway is a cabinet with "clearance" phones - they had 3 boxes which were Lumia phones, but couldnt see all the models, so asked to see them. Staff member takes them out and checks price for us.... two were fairly newer models (asking around $190) but one was a Lumia 520 still in shrink wrap.

 

Me : Wow, did'nt know anyone still had any of these left in stock

 

NL : Why is that ?

 

Me: Well, they are 3 years old now or close to it.

 

NL : Wont be that old..... (taps at keyboard) - Oh.... you're right.

 

(Im thinking, "$70, and we'll take it)

 

NL : Price on that is....  $149

 

Me : For a 3 year old phone ? Which was selling for $200 new (if looked around) anyway 2 years+ ago ? No thanks.

 

 

 

(Wife now has a Alcatel C5 - not my choice but shes happy with it)

 

 





XPD / Gavin

 

LinkTree

 

 

 


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
surfisup1000
5288 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2159


  #1501319 29-Feb-2016 10:51
Send private message

In defence of noel leemings, the computer says no , so they must be right. 

 

 




hyperman
418 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 101


  #1501322 29-Feb-2016 10:57
Send private message

surfisup1000:

 

In defence of noel leemings, the computer says no , so they must be right. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and how many $M of DEAD! stock do they have! with that sort of attitude I would expect plenty!
bring on DSE 2.0





 The views expressed by me are not necessarily those of my employer


surfisup1000
5288 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2159


  #1501333 29-Feb-2016 11:06
Send private message

hyperman:

 

and how many $M of DEAD! stock do they have! with that sort of attitude I would expect plenty!
bring on DSE 2.0

 

 

I was kidding , this is a thing from the little britain comedy series. 

 




hyperman
418 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 101


  #1501343 29-Feb-2016 11:29
Send private message

surfisup1000:

 

hyperman:

 

and how many $M of DEAD! stock do they have! with that sort of attitude I would expect plenty!
bring on DSE 2.0

 

 

I was kidding , this is a thing from the little britain comedy series. 

 

 



 

lol I did realize where the one-liner came from...

 

But you still have to ask yourself why they have a 3yo phone for sale $50 less than the RRP when it was new?
I would have burnt it long ago $70 is about where I would be pricing it too
If they had a little more flexibility with dead stock it would have sold a year ago...





 The views expressed by me are not necessarily those of my employer


Wade
2225 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 373


  #1501344 29-Feb-2016 11:31
Send private message

I'd love it if the inventory in my warehouse miraculously reduced in cost as it aged, unfortunately it doesn't


andrewNZ
2487 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1461
Inactive user


  #1501367 29-Feb-2016 11:42
Send private message

Wade:

I'd love it if the inventory in my warehouse miraculously reduced in cost as it aged, unfortunately it doesn't


Yes but:
-It costs to keep it.
-Cost doesn't equal value.

At some point you have to say "this item is costing money and losing value, it has to go".

 
 
 
 

Shop now for Dell laptops and other devices (affiliate link).
hyperman
418 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 101


  #1501389 29-Feb-2016 11:50
Send private message

andrewNZ:
Wade:

 

I'd love it if the inventory in my warehouse miraculously reduced in cost as it aged, unfortunately it doesn't

 


Yes but:
-It costs to keep it.
-Cost doesn't equal value.

At some point you have to say "this item is costing money and losing value, it has to go".

 

It's not so much that it is costing you to keep it (unless it uses power)
rather that the retail space it occupies could be used by something that is actually making you money ie. a current line

 

The other big problem is perceived value; as the item gets older the less a customer is willing to pay





 The views expressed by me are not necessarily those of my employer


Wade
2225 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 373


  #1501392 29-Feb-2016 11:58
Send private message

Inventory has a value, writing its stock value down is the same as losing money, shareholders get a bit ancie about that sort of thing so much red tape and BS to go through

 

 

 

Logic and finance don't always work hand in hand in bigger companies


Geektastic
18009 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8465

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1501397 29-Feb-2016 12:07
Send private message

Wade:

 

Inventory has a value, writing its stock value down is the same as losing money, shareholders get a bit ancie about that sort of thing so much red tape and BS to go through

 

 

 

Logic and finance don't always work hand in hand in bigger companies

 

 

 

 

However, of course, inventory value of consumer electronics reaches below cost fairly fast I would imagine.

 

I see this sometimes with camera stores - they have old models at expensive prices "because that is what it cost us". They often fail to grasp that what it cost them is not relevant once the item has been consigned to history in the eyes of the buyer...!

 

I've even seen them trying to sell older models for more than newer ones because the currency was in a different place when they bought the older ones. Reality sometimes seems lacking...






hyperman
418 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 101


  #1501398 29-Feb-2016 12:08
Send private message

Wade:

 

Inventory has a value, writing its stock value down is the same as losing money, shareholders get a bit ancie about that sort of thing so much red tape and BS to go through

 

 

 

Logic and finance don't always work hand in hand in bigger companies

 

 

 

 

2 ways to look at it
you can have 90$M of dead stock at cost that is going nowhere occupying 1/3 of your store space (and growing)
or you can sell it at a loss and only have 10$M of dead stock that now gave you 50$M in turnover to send on new stock that is more likely to make 80$M
as the customer is more inclined to spend full price on a new item than a old one...





 The views expressed by me are not necessarily those of my employer


floydbloke
3646 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4554

ID Verified

  #1501402 29-Feb-2016 12:18
Send private message

hyperman:

 

Wade:

 

Inventory has a value, writing its stock value down is the same as losing money, shareholders get a bit ancie about that sort of thing so much red tape and BS to go through

 

 

 

Logic and finance don't always work hand in hand in bigger companies

 

 

 

 

2 ways to look at it
you can have 90$M of dead stock at cost that is going nowhere occupying 1/3 of your store space (and growing)
or you can sell it at a loss and only have 10$M of dead stock that now gave you 50$M in turnover to send on new stock that is more likely to make 80$M
as the customer is more inclined to spend full price on a new item than a old one...

 

 

 

 

But then you'd need either a system or people (or both) to manage and monitor this continuously, which also costs money (and I suspect a significant capital investment up-front).





Sometimes I use big words I don't always fully understand in an effort to make myself sound more photosynthesis.


 
 
 

Shop on-line at New World now for your groceries (affiliate link).
hyperman
418 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 101


  #1501409 29-Feb-2016 12:28
Send private message

floydbloke:

 

hyperman:

 

Wade:

 

Inventory has a value, writing its stock value down is the same as losing money, shareholders get a bit ancie about that sort of thing so much red tape and BS to go through

 

 

 

Logic and finance don't always work hand in hand in bigger companies

 

 

 

 

2 ways to look at it
you can have 90$M of dead stock at cost that is going nowhere occupying 1/3 of your store space (and growing)
or you can sell it at a loss and only have 10$M of dead stock that now gave you 50$M in turnover to send on new stock that is more likely to make 80$M
as the customer is more inclined to spend full price on a new item than a old one...

 

 

 

 

But then you'd need either a system or people (or both) to manage and monitor this continuously, which also costs money (and I suspect a significant capital investment up-front).

 

 

you already employ them!

 

1st line is your buyers; as a line gets close to end of line, drop its price and try and reduce numbers; if need be talk to the supplier and try and get a "rebate to clear old stock"

 

2nd line is your store managers!; one-off, damaged, ex-display be realistic





 The views expressed by me are not necessarily those of my employer


Wade
2225 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 373


  #1501513 29-Feb-2016 14:48
Send private message

hyperman:

 

floydbloke:

 

hyperman:

 

Wade:

 

Inventory has a value, writing its stock value down is the same as losing money, shareholders get a bit ancie about that sort of thing so much red tape and BS to go through

 

 

 

Logic and finance don't always work hand in hand in bigger companies

 

 

 

 

2 ways to look at it
you can have 90$M of dead stock at cost that is going nowhere occupying 1/3 of your store space (and growing)
or you can sell it at a loss and only have 10$M of dead stock that now gave you 50$M in turnover to send on new stock that is more likely to make 80$M
as the customer is more inclined to spend full price on a new item than a old one...

 

 

 

 

But then you'd need either a system or people (or both) to manage and monitor this continuously, which also costs money (and I suspect a significant capital investment up-front).

 

 

you already employ them!

 

1st line is your buyers; as a line gets close to end of line, drop its price and try and reduce numbers; if need be talk to the supplier and try and get a "rebate to clear old stock"

 

2nd line is your store managers!; one-off, damaged, ex-display be realistic

 

 

 

 

Like i said, logic and finance (departments) don't always see eye to eye, senior management are usually chasing middle management to achieve "x"% margins which can't always be achieved if dumping stock at cost or below. For the record i agree with your logic however i am yet to work for a company that approaches 'dead' stock issues with any logic at all

 

 

 

 


Journeyman
1205 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1236


  #1501597 29-Feb-2016 16:43
Send private message

And inevitably what ends up happening is that a company that thought it had $$$ worth of assets comes to realise that it is in fact close to zero. Then some creative accounting takes place...


sbiddle
30853 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9996

Retired Mod
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  #1501599 29-Feb-2016 16:52
Send private message

Journeyman:

 

And inevitably what ends up happening is that a company that thought it had $$$ worth of assets comes to realise that it is in fact close to zero. Then some creative accounting takes place...

 

 

Dick Smith anybody?

 

 


 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.