Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


rokki

374 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 49


#198005 22-Jun-2016 09:29
Send private message

Hi all I just received this PM from a forum member !!!!

" I´m Martin from Germany and have a special request:If you or your friends, neighbours, co-workers or other people in your environment have SKY TV and a rather fast internet connection, I have something for you:
My question is: Would you like to purchase a Sky subscription and slingbox or add multiroom to your existing subscription."

What are people's thought on recieveing something like this ?





My gear 55" Samsung 4K SUHD LCD HDR , Denon AVR-4200W Reciever in 7.1.2 Surround , Denon 2 Channel Amp to power ceiling speakers , Combination of Polk Audio Fronts And Tannoy Surrounds plus 2 Cambridge Audio Ceiling Speakers Pioneer Downfiring Subwoofer , Oppo UDP-203 UHD Player , Roku Ultra , Apple TV 3

View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2

gzt

gzt
18679 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 7810

Lifetime subscriber

  #1578096 22-Jun-2016 09:39
Send private message

Same posted to many forums:

http://www.iptvforums.net/thread/13205.aspx

Some kind of streaming tv site operation?



sbiddle
30853 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9996

Retired Mod
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  #1578097 22-Jun-2016 09:39
Send private message

How do you think all the online streaming services (such as sport) get their content? smile

 

Makes a difference from people wanting to card share..

 

 

 

 


freitasm
BDFL - Memuneh
80646 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41030

Administrator
ID Verified
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  #1578099 22-Jun-2016 09:51
Send private message

You should contact myself or a moderator instead of posting in the forums. We can then collect information from which user is sending this as moderators cannot read anyone else's PMs.

 

Also removed details as it's not good to have that in public.

 

 





Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies 

 

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

 




Fred99
13684 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10018


  #1578119 22-Jun-2016 10:26
Send private message

I think I need this explained to me like I'm 5 - this is how I understand it - correct me if I'm wrong:

 

You have a Sky HD subscription and a "Slingbox".  The Slingbox streams - effectively "rebroadcasting" your sky satellite feed - through to "Martin" in "Germany".  Martin then gives away (oh no he probably doesn't - he "sells" or runs a for profit service) access to Sky's content.  Sky has a problem because unless they could get Martin's cooperation, they can't find out who is streaming the content to Martin.  Martin presumably sets up his service in a manner which makes it near impossible for Sky TV to shut him down.

 

But you're not safe doing this from NZ, as if Martin wasn't clever enough hiding his tracks and stuffs up, then they will break down doors, and as you've accepted payment/compensation from Martin, then rather than facing 3 strikes laws as in the case of sharing a torrent etc, they'll be suing you for a massive sum.  That won't be limited to theoretical losses for Sky TV NZ (ie based on people in NZ who watched your stream) but global, as you'd have probably been streaming content which would have been syndicated globally. I guess you could upload the stream to Martin via a VPN to give an extra level of anonymity, but I'm also guessing that the stakes are pretty high here - enough to provoke a concerted effort to catch you.

 

I watched a bit of a 24 hours of Le Mans the other day, presumably re-broadcast from a pay TV  subscriber, then streamed live via youtube.  I was surprised that it was working, sometimes tens of thousands of viewers, quality was okay (720p). Curious that youtube can block user video that had a background sound that seemed via Google's algorithms to be close enough to some copyrighted work to block it, but this got through no problem.


wasabi2k
2102 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 860


  #1578148 22-Jun-2016 10:42
Send private message

Fred99:

 

Curious that youtube can block user video that had a background sound that seemed via Google's algorithms to be close enough to some copyrighted work to block it, but this got through no problem.

 

 

Realtime vs Processing an upload. I don't think ContentID works realtime (yet).


Fred99
13684 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10018


  #1578167 22-Jun-2016 10:49
Send private message

wasabi2k:

 

Fred99:

 

Curious that youtube can block user video that had a background sound that seemed via Google's algorithms to be close enough to some copyrighted work to block it, but this got through no problem.

 

 

Realtime vs Processing an upload. I don't think ContentID works realtime (yet).

 

 

 

 

Yeah - I guess that would be a very very difficult thing to do, as the algorithm compares a to b, but you've only got a with new live content.  Still I was surprised that a person didn't dob in the live feed on youtube, it wasn't hard to find.


 
 
 

Shop now on AliExpress (affiliate link).
ZollyMonsta
3009 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 379

ID Verified
Trusted

  #1578170 22-Jun-2016 10:56
Send private message

Most people probably haven't heard of forensic watermarking.





 

 

Check out my LPFM Radio Station at www.thecheese.co.nz - Now on iHeart Radio, TuneIn and Radio Garden

 

As per the usual std disclaimer.. "All thoughts typed here are my own."


Fred99
13684 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10018


  #1578261 22-Jun-2016 12:12
Send private message

ZollyMonsta:

 

Most people probably haven't heard of forensic watermarking.

 

 

 

 

Probably better explain that further.  Not to be confused with forensic watermark that identifies which copy of the original media was being pirated (ie as has been used to successfully trace and then prosecute people who'd uploaded/distributed watermarked pre-release movies etc), but forensic watermarking could be applied at the set top box/decoder level, embedding the serial number of the decoder which would very quickly be able to be traced back. Also not to be confused with watermark / logos etc.  The watermark could be hidden, spread across the frame (ie so it couldn't be cropped out), could be dropped into a few random frames only etc, so practically impossible to detect let alone remove.


rokki

374 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 49


  #1578310 22-Jun-2016 13:09
Send private message

Fred99:

ZollyMonsta:


Most people probably haven't heard of forensic watermarking.



 


Probably better explain that further.  Not to be confused with forensic watermark that identifies which copy of the original media was being pirated (ie as has been used to successfully trace and then prosecute people who'd uploaded/distributed watermarked pre-release movies etc), but forensic watermarking could be applied at the set top box/decoder level, embedding the serial number of the decoder which would very quickly be able to be traced back. Also not to be confused with watermark / logos etc.  The watermark could be hidden, spread across the frame (ie so it couldn't be cropped out), could be dropped into a few random frames only etc, so practically impossible to detect let alone remove.



I posted it in a way as a warning to people not to be stupid.




My gear 55" Samsung 4K SUHD LCD HDR , Denon AVR-4200W Reciever in 7.1.2 Surround , Denon 2 Channel Amp to power ceiling speakers , Combination of Polk Audio Fronts And Tannoy Surrounds plus 2 Cambridge Audio Ceiling Speakers Pioneer Downfiring Subwoofer , Oppo UDP-203 UHD Player , Roku Ultra , Apple TV 3

DarthKermit
5346 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3317

Trusted

  #1578314 22-Jun-2016 13:15
Send private message

I notice that you can report anyone's post on the message boards, but there isn't a way to report dodgy messages to the moderators here.

 

@freitasm, could this be looked at as a future improvement since you say the mods can't read user's messages?


andrew027
1286 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 557


  #1578477 22-Jun-2016 17:16
Send private message

@DarthKermit: I notice that you can report anyone's post on the message boards, but there isn't a way to report dodgy messages to the moderators here.

 

@freitasm, could this be looked at as a future improvement since you say the mods can't read user's messages? 

 

[Edit] Oops - misinterpreted the post, sorry. Can you "forward" messages? In which case it could be forwarded to a mod.


 
 
 

Want to support Geekzone and browse the site without the ads? Subscribe to Geekzone now (monthly, annual and lifetime options).
DarthKermit
5346 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3317

Trusted

  #1578487 22-Jun-2016 17:35
Send private message

andrew027:

 

@DarthKermit: I notice that you can report anyone's post on the message boards, but there isn't a way to report dodgy messages to the moderators here.

 

@freitasm, could this be looked at as a future improvement since you say the mods can't read user's messages? 

 

[Edit] Oops - misinterpreted the post, sorry. Can you "forward" messages? In which case it could be forwarded to a mod.

 

 

No, you can't forward messages, that I can see.


Rikkitic
Awrrr
19062 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 16302

Lifetime subscriber

  #1578608 22-Jun-2016 19:27
Send private message

Just copy and resend it. Not exactly a lot of work.

 

 





Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

 


 


PhantomNVD
2619 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 759
Inactive user


  #1578633 22-Jun-2016 20:17
Send private message

But I could add whatever to your post before resenting and how would you prove it wasn't true?

I think if this becomes a problem, we'd need a way to add a moderator/BDFL to have 'read' access to the PM directly to ensure nobody 'tweaks' the message before sending it?

For E.g. you and tdgeek often rumble in threads so he just 'forwards' a post you sent after 'fixing' it and gets you banned (not saying he would! Just for example) what way could you have to prove YOUR copy that you forward wasn't the 'tweaked' version anyway?

freitasm
BDFL - Memuneh
80646 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41030

Administrator
ID Verified
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  #1578645 22-Jun-2016 20:41
Send private message

We currently don't have a Forward option for PMs. I can read PMs if I run a query on the database. Our moderators do not have access to anything that is not on the web platform and since they can't see the database they don't have any way to see messages. 

 

A PM report would be something to consider.





Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies 

 

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

 


 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.