People want their super fast data speeds, but hate the associated towers that are required as a part of it. Reminds me of all those NIMBY parents complaining about cellphone towers near their precious kiddie's schools. Bet you that 100% of them parents (and a lot of the kids) have a cellphone or three however.

That's interesting: my above post is time stamped as 5:52am. Looks like the geekzone server hasn't allowed for daylight saving time ending this morning. Calling @freitasm ?

DarthKermit:

 

That's interesting: my above post is time stamped as 5:52am. Looks like the geekzone server hasn't allowed for daylight saving time ending this morning. Calling @freitasm ?

 

Happens every year, and someone questions it every year.

Geektastic:

 

Came across this and thought it might be of interest. I can just imagine heaps of 80ft masts springing up over the NZ countryside!

 

What a click baity POS story,  what is their definition of "many" out of 300,000??

The more towers you have, the smaller you want the coverage "cells" to be,

sticking them on 80 foot towers does not acheive this well