I’ve been having a huge argument with my parents over this show and could use your help
I’m not overly familiar with this show but watched it tonight with celebrity player Jimmy Carr
At the end of the show He was offered the choice of cashing out what he had already banked and walking away with that or risking it for the jackpot.
He decided it wasn’t worth the risk and cashed out. At the end, they do the “what if” and played three counters to see what would have happened and in this instance the jackpot would have been won.
This is where the arguments started. My parents said “oh what a shame if he had continued playing, he would have won”
And I replied that’s wrong because there is no way to guarantee the outcome would have played out exactly the same if he had continued as it’s completely random with too many variables.
Either I’m wrong or I’m not explaining it to my parents correctly because they couldn’t understand where I was coming from.
Anyone smarter than me who watches the show care to weigh in?
TIA