Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


40 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 1


Topic # 57649 20-Feb-2010 17:18
Send private message

Iv just been to a dairy in Auckland im 18 years old since the beginning of Jan!!!

Had drivers licence and asked for a packet of rollies!!

She checked my licence and said she can not sell smokes because I have to be born in 1991.

I told her im 18 an the date on drivers licence proves that.

She said you have to be 18 ending..

She said she cant sell to me unless i was born in 1991 or under...(her boss said) this was a Bunjarby person..


CAn they do this... By the way i wasnt smoking drugs or drunk lol

View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
4288 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 82

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 300543 20-Feb-2010 17:22
Send private message

Yes they can do that, they are wrong, but they can refuse to sell to anyone they want.

What is a Bunjarby? I assume you mean a Punjabi? And what does that matter?



40 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 1


  Reply # 300544 20-Feb-2010 17:28
Send private message

Ohh yes Punjabi, umm that didn't really matter, just the way she was speaking, she didn't even know what she said when I asked her what does that mean.

She couldnt explain her self, Or didnt want to!!

Thanks for the responce

3830 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 234

Trusted

  Reply # 300546 20-Feb-2010 17:33
Send private message

Feb 20 1992 and below that year are all 18+.

She was poor at maths I guess.




Do whatever you want to do man.

  

4763 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1042

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 300558 20-Feb-2010 18:11
Send private message

Can't wait till smokes are banned completely.



40 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 1


  Reply # 300559 20-Feb-2010 18:13
Send private message

gehenna- that would be dam awesome!!!

3830 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 234

Trusted

  Reply # 300561 20-Feb-2010 18:21
Send private message

gehenna: Can't wait till smokes are banned completely.


it will never happen. one of the highest sources of income for govt and few other reasons like 'how do you help chain smokers give up without nictoine'




Do whatever you want to do man.

  

SCM

457 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 47


  Reply # 300563 20-Feb-2010 18:24
Send private message

gehenna: Can't wait till smokes are banned completely.


geez, wheres a persons freedom of choice gone. banning smoking is a bad idea!




 Click to see full size

 

 


19282 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2600
Inactive user


  Reply # 300564 20-Feb-2010 18:24
Send private message

gehenna: Can't wait till smokes are banned completely.


+1

671 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 46

Trusted

  Reply # 300568 20-Feb-2010 18:46
Send private message

used to smoke a pack a day, banning would be a good idea!

Sure they bring in money with the tax, but what is the cost in the public health system . . . *stop ranting now*

2701 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 688


  Reply # 300571 20-Feb-2010 18:59
Send private message

Johnk: used to smoke a pack a day, banning would be a good idea!

Sure they bring in money with the tax, but what is the cost in the public health system . . . *stop ranting now*


more than the tax on smoking brings in, another reason to ban smoking , free up the health system .




Common sense is not as common as you think.


4090 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 733

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 300575 20-Feb-2010 19:24
Send private message

vexxxboy:
Johnk: used to smoke a pack a day, banning would be a good idea!

Sure they bring in money with the tax, but what is the cost in the public health system . . . *stop ranting now*


more than the tax on smoking brings in, another reason to ban smoking , free up the health system .



Actually, that's not true at all. Smokers pay for their healthcare costs fair and square.


I personally think it's a filthy habit and I wouldn't take it up myself, but I totally defend the right of anyone to smoke if that's their personal choice.

268 posts

Ultimate Geek


  Reply # 300581 20-Feb-2010 20:32
Send private message

alasta:

Actually, that's not true at all. Smokers pay for their healthcare costs fair and square.


What?  Maybe if we all had to buy private insurance that'd be the case.

I'm seriously interested in an explanation for that statement.

2701 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 688


  Reply # 300584 20-Feb-2010 20:37
Send private message

alasta:
vexxxboy:
Johnk: used to smoke a pack a day, banning would be a good idea!

Sure they bring in money with the tax, but what is the cost in the public health system . . . *stop ranting now*


more than the tax on smoking brings in, another reason to ban smoking , free up the health system .



Actually, that's not true at all. Smokers pay for their healthcare costs fair and square.


I personally think it's a filthy habit and I wouldn't take it up myself, but I totally defend the right of anyone to smoke if that's their personal choice.


how do smokers pay for there healthcare if they didnt smoke they wouldnt need the care, and it would free up more care for the people whose health problems arent self-inflicted.




Common sense is not as common as you think.


2543 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 340


  Reply # 300586 20-Feb-2010 20:39
Send private message

alasta:
vexxxboy:
Johnk: used to smoke a pack a day, banning would be a good idea!

Sure they bring in money with the tax, but what is the cost in the public health system . . . *stop ranting now*


more than the tax on smoking brings in, another reason to ban smoking , free up the health system .



Actually, that's not true at all. Smokers pay for their healthcare costs fair and square.


I personally think it's a filthy habit and I wouldn't take it up myself, but I totally defend the right of anyone to smoke if that's their personal choice.


Smokers may pay the hospital costs but there are many other costs over the years including that a smoking related death isn't easy on anyone in the family.

352 posts

Ultimate Geek


  Reply # 300593 20-Feb-2010 20:53
Send private message

gehenna: Can't wait till smokes are banned completely.


While it would be nice to have the country smoke-free, banning it would only force the habit underground. The more people connected to underground, the more access to harder drugs. Harder drugs bring more violent crimes, which society would pay more for.

A big step forward is to convince the next generation that smoking is wrong. Convincing those kids looking up at adult smokers, thinking "that's what it means to be a grown up".

Let's ban those cigarette displays at the end of the supermarket isles, behind the store counters, vending machines.
Treat them like video stores treat pornography - out of sight and awkward to buy.


 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.