18+ Smokes & Alcohol

Forums › Off topic › 18+ Smokes & Alcohol

makmak

40 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 1

#57649 20-Feb-2010 17:18

Iv just been to a dairy in Auckland im 18 years old since the beginning of Jan!!!

Had drivers licence and asked for a packet of rollies!!

She checked my licence and said she can not sell smokes because I have to be born in 1991.

I told her im 18 an the date on drivers licence proves that.

She said you have to be 18 ending..

She said she cant sell to me unless i was born in 1991 or under...(her boss said) this was a Bunjarby person..

CAn they do this... By the way i wasnt smoking drugs or drunk lol

Kind Regards Kia Tu - Kia Oho - Kia Mataara

1 | 2

4999 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 462

Moderator

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#300543 20-Feb-2010 17:22

Yes they can do that, they are wrong, but they can refuse to sell to anyone they want.

What is a Bunjarby? I assume you mean a Punjabi? And what does that matter?

makmak

40 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 1

#300544 20-Feb-2010 17:28

Ohh yes Punjabi, umm that didn't really matter, just the way she was speaking, she didn't even know what she said when I asked her what does that mean.

She couldnt explain her self, Or didnt want to!!

Thanks for the responce

Kind Regards Kia Tu - Kia Oho - Kia Mataara

billgates

4705 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 671

Trusted

#300546 20-Feb-2010 17:33

Feb 20 1992 and below that year are all 18+.

She was poor at maths I guess.

Do whatever you want to do man.

gehenna

8667 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3883

Moderator

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#300558 20-Feb-2010 18:11

Can't wait till smokes are banned completely.

makmak

40 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 1

#300559 20-Feb-2010 18:13

gehenna- that would be dam awesome!!!

Kind Regards Kia Tu - Kia Oho - Kia Mataara

billgates

4705 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 671

Trusted

#300561 20-Feb-2010 18:21

gehenna: Can't wait till smokes are banned completely.

it will never happen. one of the highest sources of income for govt and few other reasons like 'how do you help chain smokers give up without nictoine'

Do whatever you want to do man.

Dyson

Shop now for Dyson appliances (affiliate link).

SCM

459 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 48

#300563 20-Feb-2010 18:24

gehenna: Can't wait till smokes are banned completely.

geez, wheres a persons freedom of choice gone. banning smoking is a bad idea!

johnr

19282 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2526
Inactive user

#300564 20-Feb-2010 18:24

gehenna: Can't wait till smokes are banned completely.

Johnk

837 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 192

ID Verified

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#300568 20-Feb-2010 18:46

used to smoke a pack a day, banning would be a good idea!

Sure they bring in money with the tax, but what is the cost in the public health system . . . *stop ranting now*

vexxxboy

4336 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2072

#300571 20-Feb-2010 18:59

Johnk: used to smoke a pack a day, banning would be a good idea!

Sure they bring in money with the tax, but what is the cost in the public health system . . . *stop ranting now*

more than the tax on smoking brings in, another reason to ban smoking , free up the health system .

Common sense is not as common as you think.

alasta

6888 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3362

Trusted

Subscriber

#300575 20-Feb-2010 19:24

vexxxboy:
Johnk: used to smoke a pack a day, banning would be a good idea!

Sure they bring in money with the tax, but what is the cost in the public health system . . . *stop ranting now*

more than the tax on smoking brings in, another reason to ban smoking , free up the health system .

Actually, that's not true at all. Smokers pay for their healthcare costs fair and square.

I personally think it's a filthy habit and I wouldn't take it up myself, but I totally defend the right of anyone to smoke if that's their personal choice.

Samsung

Shop now on Samsung phones, tablets, TVs and more (affiliate link).

friedCrumpet

271 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 2

#300581 20-Feb-2010 20:32

alasta:

Actually, that's not true at all. Smokers pay for their healthcare costs fair and square.

What? Maybe if we all had to buy private insurance that'd be the case.

I'm seriously interested in an explanation for that statement.

vexxxboy

4336 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2072

#300584 20-Feb-2010 20:37

alasta:
vexxxboy:
Johnk: used to smoke a pack a day, banning would be a good idea!

Sure they bring in money with the tax, but what is the cost in the public health system . . . *stop ranting now*

more than the tax on smoking brings in, another reason to ban smoking , free up the health system .

Actually, that's not true at all. Smokers pay for their healthcare costs fair and square.

I personally think it's a filthy habit and I wouldn't take it up myself, but I totally defend the right of anyone to smoke if that's their personal choice.

how do smokers pay for there healthcare if they didnt smoke they wouldnt need the care, and it would free up more care for the people whose health problems arent self-inflicted.

Common sense is not as common as you think.

Bung

6733 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2926

Subscriber

#300586 20-Feb-2010 20:39

alasta:
vexxxboy:
Johnk: used to smoke a pack a day, banning would be a good idea!

Sure they bring in money with the tax, but what is the cost in the public health system . . . *stop ranting now*

more than the tax on smoking brings in, another reason to ban smoking , free up the health system .

Actually, that's not true at all. Smokers pay for their healthcare costs fair and square.

I personally think it's a filthy habit and I wouldn't take it up myself, but I totally defend the right of anyone to smoke if that's their personal choice.

Smokers may pay the hospital costs but there are many other costs over the years including that a smoking related death isn't easy on anyone in the family.

rvangelder

352 posts

Ultimate Geek

#300593 20-Feb-2010 20:53

gehenna: Can't wait till smokes are banned completely.

While it would be nice to have the country smoke-free, banning it would only force the habit underground. The more people connected to underground, the more access to harder drugs. Harder drugs bring more violent crimes, which society would pay more for.

A big step forward is to convince the next generation that smoking is wrong. Convincing those kids looking up at adult smokers, thinking "that's what it means to be a grown up".

Let's ban those cigarette displays at the end of the supermarket isles, behind the store counters, vending machines.
Treat them like video stores treat pornography - out of sight and awkward to buy.

1 | 2