Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


mattwnz

20515 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4795


#85704 23-Jun-2011 21:13
Send private message

Been trying to get into the flybuys website all week during the evenings, but it has been so slow that it is taking minutes to load pages. Anyone else having this problem . Not sure if it is my isp, but every other website loads fine.

View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
muppet
2642 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1660

Trusted

  #485195 23-Jun-2011 21:21
Send private message

On TelstraClear here and holy crap. That took about 3 minutes to load.



l43a2
1784 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 591

ID Verified
Trusted

  #485198 23-Jun-2011 21:22
Send private message

slow as, Telecom :)





Ragnor
8279 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 585

Trusted

  #485208 23-Jun-2011 21:39
Send private message

26sec waiting for default.aspx, something is definitely wrong server side probably database related.

The 89+ http requests don't help.

Sharepoint used for public facing website, square peg round hole comes to mind....



jbard
1377 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 17


  #485215 23-Jun-2011 21:56
Send private message

On Telecom here and working just fine, loading in ~5 seconds.

mattwnz

20515 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4795


  #485224 23-Jun-2011 22:20
Send private message

jbard: On Telecom here and working just fine, loading in ~5 seconds.


 

Working better for me too, although still slow compared to other sites. Guess they don't have the capacity during the peak times of early evening.

Ragnor
8279 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 585

Trusted

  #485242 23-Jun-2011 22:43
Send private message

jbard: On Telecom here and working just fine, loading in ~5 seconds.


Yeah it's fine now, maybe they are using a shared database server that's over subscribed or something. 

 
 
 
 

Shop now for Lego sets and other gifts (affiliate link).
Kyanar
4089 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1684

ID Verified
Trusted

  #486380 27-Jun-2011 12:10
Send private message

Ragnor: 26sec waiting for default.aspx, something is definitely wrong server side probably database related.

The 89+ http requests don't help.

Sharepoint used for public facing website, square peg round hole comes to mind....


Turners Auctions is Sharepoint too, and that's like lightning.  Don't blame the tool.

Ragnor
8279 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 585

Trusted

  #486390 27-Jun-2011 12:35
Send private message

Kyanar: 

Turners Auctions is Sharepoint too, and that's like lightning.  Don't blame the tool.


It would be interesting to see how much hardware they had to throw at it....

timmmay
20857 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5349

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #486392 27-Jun-2011 12:54
Send private message

Running on a work network pages load in less than a second here.

jbard
1377 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 17


  #487087 28-Jun-2011 19:44
Send private message

Unusable trying to redeem a reward tonight on Telecom.

Seems like it just can't cope with peak time load.

freitasm
BDFL - Memuneh
80646 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41026

Administrator
ID Verified
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  #487104 28-Jun-2011 20:15
Send private message

Ragnor:
Kyanar: 

Turners Auctions is Sharepoint too, and that's like lightning.  Don't blame the tool.


It would be interesting to see how much hardware they had to throw at it....


It all comes down to implementation, regardless of technology. 

I know of people that instead of fine tuning databases, looking for problems in the code, etc, just go and scale up. That's sure recipe for disaster in long term. I know of web sites that had problems with load while running on Apach and Linux.

Platform is no recipe for success. How you use it is.

  

 




Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies 

 

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

 


 
 
 

Shop now on AliExpress (affiliate link).
mattwnz

20515 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4795


  #487134 28-Jun-2011 20:49
Send private message

jbard: Unusable trying to redeem a reward tonight on Telecom.


Seems like it just can't cope with peak time load.


 

Yes it is totally dead. I did contact them about it but they never replied. It should work later on tonight, but if I was an advertiser I wouldn't be happy that the website has these problems and for so long.

Ragnor
8279 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 585

Trusted

  #487616 30-Jun-2011 00:22
Send private message

freitasm: 

It all comes down to implementation, regardless of technology. 

I know of people that instead of fine tuning databases, looking for problems in the code, etc, just go and scale up. That's sure recipe for disaster in long term. I know of web sites that had problems with load while running on Apach and Linux.

Platform is no recipe for success. How you use it is.



They could use Aptimize or one of the competitors since they work as an ISAPI filter in IIS modifying the output before it's sent to the client.
http://www.aptimize.com/web-performance/sharepoint-performance

That may help with some of their peak load issues at least.

Otherwise Sharepoint's a proprietary product you can't touch the base code nor the base database schema at all. You can't do things like add indexes, change schema, denormalize for performance etc... it's a black box..

After a certain number of requests per second you simply have to give the server(s) running it (IIS and SQL Server) more hardware (load balancing etc).





freitasm
BDFL - Memuneh
80646 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41026

Administrator
ID Verified
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  #487652 30-Jun-2011 07:59
Send private message

Aptimize would help reducing the number of requests to the server, reducing the network traffic and some of the load, sure.

But if the problem is in the backend (IIS SQL, CPU availability, memory) then Aptimize won't help. I know - we use Aptimize on Geekzone.

At some stage, regardless of platform, you have to decide to scale up or scale out. This is inevitable if you have a busy web service. It's just how things work, more users, more transactions, more resources needed to service these. Otherwise you wouldn't hear of massive dedicated distributed data centres running some busy web sites. Everyone would be running on LAMP with a 256 MB RAM Intel PIII 200 MHz, right?

I haven't look at their site, so I don't know what they have there. They might have a load balancer already, using a CDN or domain sharding for static resources (as we do). Perhaps the load balancer is faulty and sending everything to a single server? Or perhaps one of the routers borked? Or perhaps a DNS configuration going wrong is sending all requests to a server in the US?

Who knows? Blaming the platform out of the bat with no more information is... strange. It sounds to me it's a case of "It's Microsoft, it's bad by default".

I am not saying SharePoint is the most beautiful and usable platform in the world. But it's very easy to throw stones from this side of the glass house.




Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies 

 

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

 


Ragnor
8279 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 585

Trusted

  #487722 30-Jun-2011 10:29
Send private message

Why throw up so many strawmans... I didn't mention LAMP at all nor say Microsoft is bad by default.

I'm basically saying two things:

1: Sharepoint is a bad choice for a public facing website, it's very strong as an internal document management system but not as a public facing website/cms imo.  They rolled their old Content Management Server into Sharepoint 2007 before that it had no CMS abilities and MCMS was a terrible out of date product.

2: It's quite heavy by it's nature and would seem to require a lot more hardware to serve the same number of requests say compared to popular ASP.NET CMS systems like Umbraco, Kentico, Sitefinity or a well designed bespoke/custom system.

I have previous development experience with Sharepoint and still work with other Microsoft tech like ASP.NET day to day.  It's the wrong tool for job.... you probably get a lot of partner points for deploying a public facing sharepoint site though Sealed


 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.