![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Loose lips may sink ships - Be smart - Don't post internal/commercially sensitive or confidential information!
Talkiet:Ookla are the default standard and once you remove the local issues (wifi, rubbish browser, outdated hardware, uploading to iCloud at the same time etc), it's an easy test for end users to run and gives them a number that they understand.
It's entirely possible to endorse their individual test (with a few caveats) procedures yet maintain their "Speedtest awards" are fundamentally flawed and in several provable cases are actively misleading. That's where I sit.
To me at least, it seems like the ISPs with the genuinely best performance don't actually need to go around using dodgy metrics to try and prove it.
N
insane:Talkiet:
[snip]
Cant fault anything you said there. Can you update your reverse DNS records, segment connection type to IP ranges, or setup an individual AS per connection type to try level the bias?
While that's a list of things that could be done, having engaged with Ookla before (multiple times) on the validity of their methodology for the Speedtest awards, I don't believe that it would do any good.
There are ways to game the results and I can categorically state we've never even considered doing them.
Cheers - N
Please note all comments are from my own brain and don't necessarily represent the position or opinions of my employer, previous employers, colleagues, friends or pets.
I initially thought that the 95% CIs would tell me something, and they indeed do -- the number in the sample!
gml
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |