|
|
|
I don't really see the big deal here. I got h/f the old ONT no issues. What benefits is this new ONT offering?
https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/ac196527-8a21-43b2-8935-2e315ff5f9a9
Exclusive for Geekzone Members!
Dynamic IP & Bring Your Own Device Hyperfibre & Fibre plans & NO Contracts with Hyperline.co.nz powered by ASN 9790 Network
Chrous areas only HYPERLINE.co.nz
The first gen ONT is allegedly very power-hungry and physically large. This probably isn't an issue for the initial early-adopter folks who might have it sitting in a half-rack full of storage and servers running 24/7... but it's an issue as they try to move towards mass-market, where people want to fit it inside recessed network cabinets with limited cooling, along with other networking equipments. They're tight enough as it is.
Power is also an issue if you want to run one for a while off a UPS, whether AC or DC. PBTech sells these, which claim a 2.5h runtime for a standard ONT off a ~8Wh 18650. "Less than 46W" on the other hand implies a <10 minute runtime on battery.
Other than the option for use as an RGW (which I imagine the new ONT could do fine), what's superior about the old one? They're glorified media converters.
quickymart:
That's a trial with one RSP, it's not a commercially offered service (yet).
Actually it's a Chorus wide trial. https://sp.chorus.co.nz/product-update/hyperfibre-ont-self-upgrade-trial
First I've heard of it being offered by any RSP though, so it might be "Chorus-wide" but I've not heard of any RSP's offering it as a service (apart from Quic as mentioned here).
In any case, if the trial works and it ends up saving a tech visit, great.
quickymart:
First I've heard of it being offered by any RSP though, so it might be "Chorus-wide" but I've not heard of any RSP's offering it as a service (apart from Quic as mentioned here).
In any case, if the trial works and it ends up saving a tech visit, great.
We actually had 5 RSPs take part and it went really well. Our systems need some more love before we can scale it into anything bigger, but watch this space.
Just a quick note around the 1st vs 2nd gen Hyperfibre ONTs. The first gen has a bunch of features that the second gen doesn't have, e.g. wi-fi. That was really important in 2019 when we launched, but in 2023, there's better equipment out there, and it's starting to not cost the earth. We have made the decision to let our ONT be a simpler device (No wi-fi, no routing, wall mounted). The trade-off is now the customer needs to provide the CPE (Either the end user or the RSP). I'm really keen to get the second gen out into market, but we have a stock of the 1st gens that we need to use. I'm not too keen on dumping perfectly good working equipment.
So, the more people who order hyperfibre, the sooner I can get the ONT on the wall :)
SomeoneSomewhere:
"Less than 46W" on the other hand implies a <10 minute runtime on battery.
You got me curious on this, so we've tested the ONTs at the lab.
The various GPON ONTs draw around 5-6W, while the 1st gen XGS-PON ONT drew 9.5W at idle in bridge mode, load does not add significant power draw (still measured 9.5W with 8Gbps up and down). in RGW mode with wi-fi and ethernet throughput that goes up to 15W under load or 11W at idle. It looks like that 46W is an absolute max power draw and is largely driven by the two ATA ports being "off the hook".
The new 2nd gen XGS-PON draws 8.7W, so slightly less, but nothing to get too excited by?
Very useful post. I wanted to check that if I place an order for Hyperfibre next week -
Space is really the only reason why I havent switched yet to Hyperfibre since I would want to mount this similar to the existing ONT.
Thanks
-- opinions expressed by me are solely my own. ie - personal
Jiriteach:Very useful post. I wanted to check that if I place an order for Hyperfibre next week -
- Can I have the option of upgrading the ONT myself? Much easier if I do then can spend time sorting out the cabling to make it fit alongside my switches etc.
- Will I recieve the new smaller ONT. Have limited space since its inside my FTTH cabinet.
Space is really the only reason why I havent switched yet to Hyperfibre since I would want to mount this similar to the existing ONT.
Thanks
Vindy500:Jiriteach:
Very useful post. I wanted to check that if I place an order for Hyperfibre next week -
- Can I have the option of upgrading the ONT myself? Much easier if I do then can spend time sorting out the cabling to make it fit alongside my switches etc.
- Will I recieve the new smaller ONT. Have limited space since its inside my FTTH cabinet.
Space is really the only reason why I havent switched yet to Hyperfibre since I would want to mount this similar to the existing ONT.
Thanks
I feel like the bearer of bad news on this one. The new ONT won't be out in the network until next year (when stocks of the larger first gen ONT are exhausted). We also aren't ready to do self-upgrade (some big system upgrades are required) and won't be likely to support it until next year.
For the next 6 months or so, it'll be a technician installing the first gen ONT
No worries - thanks for the clarity. First gen ONT's are HUGE! :) - no hurry can wait until nexy year.
-- opinions expressed by me are solely my own. ie - personal
Jiriteach:Very useful post. I wanted to check that if I place an order for Hyperfibre next week -
- Can I have the option of upgrading the ONT myself? Much easier if I do then can spend time sorting out the cabling to make it fit alongside my switches etc.
- Will I recieve the new smaller ONT. Have limited space since its inside my FTTH cabinet.
Space is really the only reason why I havent switched yet to Hyperfibre since I would want to mount this similar to the existing ONT.
Thanks
Why can't we use our own OTN?
I would like to buy the new Fritzbox 5690 which has fibre OTN
FritzBox 5690 Pro
Chorus (and other LFCs) do not want end users plugging/unplugging fibre any more than absolutely necessary. It's fragile and prone to contamination. End users removing their ONT/router and leaving the fibre hanging in the open is also a serious concern.
Because GPON doesn't support port-based authentication (~16 properties share one 'port'), GPON requires some kind of secret-based authentication, preferably proper crypto to stop people eavesdropping on their neighbours traffic. That's harder to setup with end-user-supplied gear.
The actual optics are in an SFP, which may not be supplied or might not be compatible. Chorus has *trialed* offering SFP-type ONTs for business customers, but I don't know if that went anywhere. Note that SFPs are limited to 1Gb/s (some 2.5Gb/s which is I think non-standard), and the 10Gb/s SFP+ version is physically different.
It also means you can't have multiple services supplied from one ONT, which I think is currently a legislative requirement to get Crown funding.
If you want to use that router, there's nothing stopping you connecting it to your existing ONT with a Cat6 patch lead.
While the list of why we like to use our own ONTs is long (and won't be changing that policy anytime soon), I wanted to just touch on one more thing.
That unit only does GPON, which while has capability of 2.5G, we use a 1:16 splitter, which means that 2.5G is shared over all the customers on that splitter. We wont be offering more than 1 gig on G-PON to ensure all the customers on the street have a uncongested experience.
However we are making significant investment to deliver XGS-PON, which has 10G to share per port, this is what is allowing us to offer these multi-gig speeds. XGS-PON optics are significantly more expensive, but we think its worth it :)
|
|
|