josephhinvest: I’d prefer to have a static IP, but DDNS is serving me well enough.
Wouldn’t it be advantageous for an ISP to have as many customers on static IPs as possible, thus reducing the need to manage their pool of dynamic addresses?
Dynamic ip addresses are easier to manage.
If an ISP wants to place network concentrators and CDN nodes closer to end users then they need to break their IP space down into geographic subnets. Super easy to do but when they need to reallocate subnets to different areas, a huge pain in the ass - but the solution was simple, just get more IPs (or buy more but they are super expensive on the second-hand market) and assign new blocks to where they are needed.
Now that cant be done because one customer might still be using an IP in a /24 subnet so it cant be reused elsewhere. There are ways around it but still a pain and huge cost.


