brickviking: Ah, I see. I hadn't fully got that from what I've read of the forums so far. Okay, so that's one less hurdle as such. But even if they roll out UFB, I'm not sure that the same constraints that hold back Chorus from installing a new cabinet at the BUR/S site don't also preclude them from installing UFB in the same area. Anyhow, time I went to check my email.
Regards, BrickViking
(Post 9)
Looking at this from a technical perspective there is no reason why Chorus would want to reinstate the cabinet because there is no economic reason for wanting to. What's important to note here is the lack of cabinet is not the cause of your issue.
That area is now very sparse of properties and cabinets are installed for 2 reasons - to meet demand for lines (as a cabinet will typically do 288) and to ensure that the MPF from a cabinet is under 2km to meet the 10Mbps commitment with the government. Design work means that most cabinets deliver a MPF length of 1km maximum, with many lines being under 500m to deliver VDSL2.
BUR/AD is literally 300m away on the same street and if all lines have been connected to that as suggested you're now looking at 300m being added onto all MPF's - which looking at the maps would probably mean the maximum MPF length is probably 1.2km tops. This will deliver perfectly functioning ADSL2+ with a high sync rate but if you are on the outskirts of the cabinet coverage you're not going to get VDSL2 whereas you may have done so before.
You need to go back a few steps and find the cause of your problem - it would seem there is possibly a bad jumper or poor MPF causing your high attenuation. Your ISP is the one who needs to follow this up.