Hi all,
deadlyllama:
It deduces I can get UFB so suggests ISPs that don't have a handover in my area (bigpipe, voyager).
Suggests an unlimited Actrix plan! I thought, wow, Actrix do unlimited now? Turns out they don't.
If I say I want a static IP it doesn't show MyRepublic. Who offer static IPs.
The database of plans is a bit rubbish, and it clearly doesn't cope with less-than-nationwide UFB coverage.
MyRepublic plans have been updated yesterday. Now information about MyRepublic is accurate.
Actrix plans will be updated tonight or tomorrow.
hio77:
damn, thats impressive for adsl2...
Some of the wireless providers appear to have disappared (or ratings simply changed, im not going to go through all the pages)
Gisborne net is being suggested as third for my address now, Never knew Rural Westcoast Auckland was so close to gisborne!
Thanks for this notice. We updated Unlimited Internet plans yesterday. Now it is accurate.
We are checking coverage at the moment (ADSL, VDSL, UFB). We are developing some enhancements related to providers geo-location (yeah, even right now).
chevrolux:
Hahahaha wow.....
This seems like a fantastic tool for uninformed consumers to be basing their internet provider choice on.
But seriously, although the site clearly has good intentions this is the sort of misinformation that makes NZers have such a bad attitude towards our ISPs. Imagine when joe bloggs from Auckland rings gisborne.net and asks for a highspeed wireless connection, then gets all grumpy when they tell him it's not available.
Yes, we know that it can be some inaccurate data related to providers geo-location. This is on our short-term enhancements list.
freitasm: I find interesting some people have no problem using beta software but get so sarcastic when they could help improve a new service.
Thank you for these words.
We are trying to make a really good and useful web-site for people. Of course, at the early stage, we face some issues. However, we are open to any feedback (positive or negative) and we are ready to listen and make changes if it is required.
PhantomNVD: Wasn't trying to be sarcastic myself, just thought to point out a seemingly obvious error. I see that business is somehow separated from residential, though I'd personally say that's an arbitrary separation as many home businesses might also be looking at this, and some home users are prepared to pay for a business plan if they want/need some business grade features?
@BroadbandCompare FWIW my ISP is Skinny Broadband.
*edit - so if I severely limit the financial range I finally see Skinny, listed last, and only rated 4/4??? I'm getting 25-30/1-5 so is 4/4 the minimum or 'expected' for my address?
Could I suggest a slightly easier to compare 'grid' option where all the providers at the same filter were offered 'equally' with a rating value listed separately? E.g. If my price point is $55 (like skinny is) I could either filter the price or scroll down a table listing to the $55 row and see what other options there are in that price category. Seems like a table view would show far more options in an easier-to-compare way, even if only as an 'option'?
Thank you for your feedback.
Skinny provider is listed on our web-site: http://www.broadbandcompare.co.nz/broadbands/index
I see, you found it. That's great. We are waiting for plans update for Skinny on Monday. Sorry for possible inconvenience here. Providers change their plans very often. We try updating plans ASAP. Please, forgive us here, we just launched. It can be some delay updating plans these days.
> Could I suggest a slightly easier to compare 'grid' option where all the providers at the same filter were offered 'equally' with a rating value listed separately? E.g. If my price point is $55 (like skinny is) I could either filter the price or scroll down a table listing to the $55 row and see what other options there are in that price category. Seems like a table view would show far more options in an easier-to-compare way, even if only as an 'option'?
You could change 'sorting type' from rating to price:
Is what you need?
Thanks.