nztim:
They ran it to Haast so why not? :)
you had to pick the most remote part of NZ for that response :)
LOL, of COURSE I picked the remotest, stupidest, most expensive part of NZ to make my point. To spell it out...
There are OBVIOUSLY some locations in NZ where people live that clearly don't make sense to include in the fibre rollout. And as soon as we can all agree on that baseline fact, the discussion then becomes "Where is the Social/economic benefit vs cost line that separates that haves (fibres) from the has nots (Not haz fibres)?
And once we all agree that THAT is the real question, we all think that every fringe case should be included if we live there, and that if another fringe case gets it and we don't then it's a travesty.
There are multiple broadband technologies available from multiple providers, and while I personally think that fibre is the best currently available connection, there are others that would do me just fine if I lived in a lovely place in the countryside...
We should be advocating for a robust method of setting the line and investing where it will have the most net benefit - and where it doesn't we grin and bear it, and order a different technology.
Cheers - N








