Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


networkn

Networkn
32862 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 15453

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

#165775 20-Feb-2015 12:03
Send private message

Hi There!

Would there be any reasonable reason for an ISP to give a UFB connection a Static IP with a Subnet Mask of 255.255.255.0? My understanding was that in a P2P Connection like UFB the Static IP assigned to the connection would be 255.255.255.255

Any insight would be appreciated.


Create new topic
LennonNZ
2459 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 411

ID Verified
Trusted

  #1243013 20-Feb-2015 13:00
Send private message

It is a bug with Sonicwalls. See http://www.tec1.co.uk/blog/pppoe-subnet-mask-issues-with-sonicwalls.

I would check with your vendor if they have a fix for this problem



LennonNZ
2459 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 411

ID Verified
Trusted

  #1243018 20-Feb-2015 13:08
Send private message

This is also answered on the Dell Website and describes it as feature.. rather than a bug.

https://support.software.dell.com/kb/sw9374



networkn

Networkn
32862 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 15453

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1243020 20-Feb-2015 13:11
Send private message

Thanks, useful information.

Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.