Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


xpd



Chief Trash Bandit
9146 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1443

Mod Emeritus
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

Topic # 198691 19-Jul-2016 11:05
Send private message

Theres probably already a post explaining this somewhere but I'll push on anyway... ;)

 

Can someone explain to me why a street that has extremely large grass verges in front of properties, have their UFB done via an "aerial" install (using existing power poles) rather than in the ground ? From the pole to the property is done underground where possible.

 

Yet streets such as mine which have very limited grass verges, are not considered for aerial installs ?

 


TIA

 

 





XPD / Gavin / DemiseNZ

 

Server : i3-3240 @ 3.40GHz  16GB RAM  Win 10 Pro    Workstation : i5-xxxx @ x.xxGHz  16GB RAM  Win 10 pro    Console : Xbox One

 

https://www.xpd.co.nz - Games, geeks, and more.    


Create new topic
3511 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 986


  Reply # 1594942 19-Jul-2016 11:15
Send private message

What is your current Chorus Copper installation?

 

Usually they will simply replicate what exists already

 

 


2772 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 555


  Reply # 1594961 19-Jul-2016 12:02
Send private message

Central Auckland has a lot of overhaed phone/power lines - Often the last bit from the street to the house is underground.

 

Our street has that situation and thats the way they have done the UFB as well. Guess its cheaper to do on a very tight budget.

 

In a perfect world they would have continued with the underground reticulation program and the power and old phone lines would have already been underground - but that seemed to stop years ago with no inclination of ever resuming.





Nothing is impossible for the man who doesn't have to do it himself - A. H. Weiler

 
 
 
 


1776 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 405

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1594996 19-Jul-2016 12:59
Send private message

xpd:

 

Theres probably already a post explaining this somewhere but I'll push on anyway... ;)

 

Can someone explain to me why a street that has extremely large grass verges in front of properties, have their UFB done via an "aerial" install (using existing power poles) rather than in the ground ? From the pole to the property is done underground where possible.

 

Yet streets such as mine which have very limited grass verges, are not considered for aerial installs ?

 


TIA

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerial is cheaper than digging.

 

 





________

 

Antonios K

 

 

 

Click to see full size


1984 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 133

Trusted

  Reply # 1597710 24-Jul-2016 13:35
Send private message

Better and cheaper for the fibre to be moved underground at same time as the power during the same set of roadworks ie dig once. Even if you still wanted to underground fibre only, you would later on have to manage the logistics and risk of threading power ducts under the fibre ducts.





Qualified in business, certified in fibre, stuck in copper, have to keep going  ^_^

Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Geekzone Live »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.