Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


DarthKermit

5346 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3317

Trusted

#204422 30-Sep-2016 22:20
Send private message

An Invercargill man may be given a harsher sentence because electronic monitoring equipment does not work on fibre connections.

 

As fibre is rolled out across the country to replace copper lines and new properties are being developed it's causing a problem for the Department of Corrections and judges when it comes to sentencing.

 

Kane Stephen Evans appeared in the Invercargill District Court before Judge Mark Callaghan on Thursday but had his sentence adjourned because the property at which he planned to serve a community detention sentence was deemed unsuitable.

 

Evans' lawyer, Jono Ross, told the court Evans had been working in Cromwell, and planned to serve his community detention sentence at his mother's home in a Cromwell subdivision.

 

But because the property was new, it had a fibre connection instead of the old copper wiring, which meant a standard landline connection was not available at the proposed address.

 

That meant that Evans would not be able to be electronically monitored while serving his sentence, Ross said.

 

He was to be sentenced for driving while disqualified, burglary, receiving, possessing cannabis and shoplifting.

 

Ross called for the judge to either sentence Evans to community detention without electronic monitoring, or put off sentencing so that Evans could put forward a different address in Cromwell or Invercargill.

 

Judge Callaghan decided to adjourn the hearing to November 24 to allow Evans to find another address, but indicated that if the address was in Invercargill, he would be more likely to sentence Evans to home detention.

 

But Department of Corrections staff said it was only if a property did not have cell phone coverage that a landline would be required.

 

Electronic monitoring assurance team leader Tracey Tapa said fibre, or digital lines, were not suitable because the technology was different to that used for electronic monitoring.

 

Properties suitable for community detention required uninterrupted Vodafone 3G coverage, or, if cellular coverage was unavailable, a landline could be used in some cases, she said.

 

It was believed Evans' case was the first where the fibre network was the only available option, Tapa said.

 

"Of the around 1700 offenders on community detention at any one time, only 40 use a landline for this connection due to lack of cellphone coverage."

 

The department was constantly working on improving the technology used to monitor offenders, she said.

 

"This particular issue will be investigated for a potential solution."

 

Chorus stakeholder communications manager Nathan Beaumont said some property developers in rural areas would request a copper connection because fibre was not necessarily readily available in that area yet.

 

When existing properties were upgraded from the old copper wiring to a fibre connection, it depended on the method of installation as to whether the copper connection was left in tact, he said.

 

In some cases, fibre cables were installed through the same pipes as the copper lines, and so copper lines were removed.

 

But if another installation method was used, like going overhead instead of underground, then the copper lines would be left untouched, Beaumont said.

 

http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/84847217/fibre-causes-sentencing-hiccup

 

 

 

Is this the same issue as older alarm systems that can't cope with fibre connections?

 

Can anyone here who's doing a stretch on home detention tell us what equipment Corrections use? tongue-out

 

 

 


Create new topic
blakamin
4431 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1306
Inactive user


  #1643544 30-Sep-2016 22:23
Send private message

Jeez! That's a bit 20th century!

 

 

 

Edit: Also shows how all these people doing HD get out and about... :D




chevrolux
4962 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2638
Inactive user


  #1643564 30-Sep-2016 22:49
Send private message

Managed router + UPS + monitoring device. Surely no less reliable than the 3G units would be?

Edit: makes me wonder. Have they tested on spark voip? By most reports alarms are working over it.

Linux
12188 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8480

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1643625 1-Oct-2016 03:04
Send private message

Sure Signal to provide 3G coverage for the ankle bracelet in zero coverage locations



richms
29104 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10222

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1643626 1-Oct-2016 03:46
Send private message

Linux: Sure Signal to provide 3G coverage for the ankle bracelet in zero coverage locations

 

Whatever they need, if they cant do it at the location the person has then corrections should pay to put them up somewhere nice that has a legacy communications network installed until they get their crap together.





Richard rich.ms

Linux
12188 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8480

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1643628 1-Oct-2016 04:45
Send private message

Why nice?

richms
29104 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10222

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1643629 1-Oct-2016 05:19
Send private message

Well it shouldn't be any worse than the place they were going to be put into before the corrections departments antique equipment stopped that from happening.





Richard rich.ms

 
 
 
 

Shop now for Lenovo laptops and other devices (affiliate link).
cynnicallemon
370 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 85


  #1643639 1-Oct-2016 07:53
Send private message

DarthKermit:

 

An Invercargill man may be given a harsher sentence because electronic monitoring equipment does not work on fibre connections.

 

 

 

 

Looks like a lawsuit to me.

 

The only people to loose that will be the taxpayer.


raytaylor
4076 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1296

Trusted

  #1644368 2-Oct-2016 20:20
Send private message

richms:

 

Well it shouldn't be any worse than the place they were going to be put into before the corrections departments antique equipment stopped that from happening.

 

 

 

 

I personally consider home detention a privilidge as opposed to going to prison. Home Detention is not a right for those convicted.





Ray Taylor

There is no place like localhost

Spreadsheet for Comparing Electricity Plans Here


BarTender
3629 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2572

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1644406 2-Oct-2016 21:46
Send private message

raytaylor:

richms:


Well it shouldn't be any worse than the place they were going to be put into before the corrections departments antique equipment stopped that from happening.

I personally consider home detention a privilidge as opposed to going to prison. Home Detention is not a right for those convicted.


The other view is incarcerating someone costs $100k+ per year. So Home detention is a slightly more cost effective option for low risk offenders than jail. I know where I would prefer my taxpayer money to be spent.

raytaylor
4076 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1296

Trusted

  #1644460 2-Oct-2016 23:42
Send private message

BarTender:
The other view is incarcerating someone costs $100k+ per year. So Home detention is a slightly more cost effective option for low risk offenders than jail. I know where I would prefer my taxpayer money to be spent.

 

We dont need to tell the convicts that. As far as they are to be concerned, money is no object when it comes to protecting potential victims.

 

I agree that its great for tax payers. But its a deal that the convict would probably want more than the tax payer though.

 

 





Ray Taylor

There is no place like localhost

Spreadsheet for Comparing Electricity Plans Here


richms
29104 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10222

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1644475 3-Oct-2016 06:21
Send private message

raytaylor:

 

I personally consider home detention a privilidge as opposed to going to prison. Home Detention is not a right for those convicted.

 

 

It is something that the justice system has decided on. They need to follow thru on it rather than just go "To hard, can't do"





Richard rich.ms

 
 
 

Stream your favourite shows now on Apple TV (affiliate link).
BarTender
3629 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2572

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1644477 3-Oct-2016 06:43
Send private message

raytaylor:

BarTender:
The other view is incarcerating someone costs $100k+ per year. So Home detention is a slightly more cost effective option for low risk offenders than jail. I know where I would prefer my taxpayer money to be spent.


We dont need to tell the convicts that. As far as they are to be concerned, money is no object when it comes to protecting potential victims.


I agree that its great for tax payers. But its a deal that the convict would probably want more than the tax payer though.


My view is Jail should only be used for hardened violent criminals. Putting low grade offenders in jail only turns them into high grade offenders when they get out.
I for one would love to see home detention used more offen. Especially when it comes to financially driven offending which in my view often has a far higher number of victims and impacts can last for years.
The failed finance company directors should be on Home Detention for life.

Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.