Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Teedee

1 post

Wannabe Geek


#288964 3-Aug-2021 16:49
Send private message

I did a research and there are 100/200 then 950M, nothing else exist. I was wondering why no one is interested at making something in between.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer Create new topic
Talkiet
4819 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3934

Trusted

  #2754589 3-Aug-2021 16:58
Send private message

Because there's next to no demand and the marginal cost of the max plans over the 100 or 200 plans is so small there's no sensible product differentiation possible.

 

Cheers - N





Please note all comments are from my own brain and don't necessarily represent the position or opinions of my employer, previous employers, colleagues, friends or pets.




wellygary
8810 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5287


  #2754591 3-Aug-2021 17:03
Send private message

Pretty sure RSPs you can only resell the speeds offered to you by Chorus?? - (happy to be corrected)


michaeln
238 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 44

Trusted

  #2754597 3-Aug-2021 17:18
Send private message

wellygary:

 

Pretty sure RSPs you can only resell the speeds offered to you by Chorus?? - (happy to be corrected)

 

 

Chorus and the other UFB fibre companies may only sell wholesale layer 2 service. They offer 200Mbps and 1Gbps (nominal, Ethernet) rates. There is nothing to stop any RSP from offering anything they want, based on those inputs. They could sell any speed up to 200Mbps (using the 200Mbps input), rate-limiting the actual speed at the ISP, or up to around 960Mbps (using the 1Gbps input), just as they can also have bigger, or lower, or no volume caps. However, since they would consume a 1Gbps service to offer anything above 200Mbps, but would (presumably) have to charge less than the full-speed service, there is little incentive to do so. And there is obviously insufficient demand, in their opinion, to pressure the fibre providers to offer an intermediate speed. 'Good' and 'Best' are sufficient, and 'Good', 'Better' and 'Best' don't seem to be required, because even the worst service—'Good'—is generally quite good enough.




richms
29098 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10209

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2754602 3-Aug-2021 17:29
Send private message

Minimal price difference and would just clutter up the pages with more options. Only really need 2 - poverty plan and fast plan.





Richard rich.ms

nztim
4012 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2710

ID Verified
Trusted
TEAMnetwork
Subscriber

  #2754630 3-Aug-2021 18:53
Send private message

People that hammer their max/max plan actually cost RSPs money for less than $20+GST per month the RSP had to provide bandwidth, pay their staff and make money




Any views expressed on these forums are my own and don't necessarily reflect those of my employer. 


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.