![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Batman:
Lias:
Every company has bad days, even top brands, but overall I stand by what I said. I've seen so way more weird little compatibility issues with Gigabyte bioses over the years than I have with Asus.
...with the basic system he's building...
Hurtful, lol.
Your mother was a hamster and your father smelled of elderberries
Gigabyte have always been reliable for me. That not to say they're better than Asus, just that I've had Gigabyte motherboards for 15 years with no issues.
BiggusDoggus:
Hurtful, lol.
basic but solid.
i just meant it is not pushing any limits of the mobo.
Batman:BiggusDoggus:Hurtful, lol.
basic but solid.
i just meant it is not pushing any limits of the mobo.
Your mother was a hamster and your father smelled of elderberries
Hey, just to check another option please.
I really don't know much about the MSI brand: https://www.pbtech.co.nz/product/MBDMSI61403/MSI-PRO-B760M-A-WIFI-mATX-Motherboard-For-Intel-12
Around the same price as the Gigabyte - much of a muchness?
Your mother was a hamster and your father smelled of elderberries
the MSI has twice the power phases of the Gigabyte. the Gigabyte's only advantage seems to be a heatsink for the SSD.
I'd get the MSI all things being equal
in theory more power phases means less stress on individual power phases (they power the CPU) so lasts longer. in theory. (for overclocking obviously more power phases the better but that's for the Z boards)
much of a muchness
BiggusDoggus:
Hey, just to check another option please.
I really don't know much about the MSI brand: https://www.pbtech.co.nz/product/MBDMSI61403/MSI-PRO-B760M-A-WIFI-mATX-Motherboard-For-Intel-12
Around the same price as the Gigabyte - much of a muchness?
you should get this and a 32gb ram kit, 16gb is costing you FPS in games
Batman:
you should get this and a 32gb ram kit, 16gb is costing you FPS in games
Show proof please, especially on a similar setup to the OP, not something running a RTX 4090 and a top end card trying to run cyberpunk at 4k or something like that.
Jase2985:
Batman:
you should get this and a 32gb ram kit, 16gb is costing you FPS in games
Show proof please, especially on a similar setup to the OP, not something running a RTX 4090 and a top end card trying to run cyberpunk at 4k or something like that.
Just FYI - running an RX6600 and driving an Xiaomi 3400x1440 ultrawide.
Your mother was a hamster and your father smelled of elderberries
I've switched back and forth between Asus and Gigabyte no hardware issues with either.
Honestly I would go for whatever fits in your budget, no point over streatching yourself as I think your CPU choice will work great with any of them.
Guess you need to figure out if inbuilt Bluetooth and WiFi are worth it to you and how many M.2 slots you may want.
I currently have a board with 2 m.2 NVME drives and I am really happy with that.
I am a plus one vote on the 32GB of ram, but that is because I am lazy.
Like right now I am not running any games, and my PC has allocated about 27GB of 32GB.
About 6GB going to firefox it looks like, 1GB going to steam, the rest no clue to be honest.
The more you have the more the PC eats I figure, I haven't found more than 16GB that important for games, its more QoL not having to manage Ram usage.
However I do notice if I do a modded Skyrim or Xcom2 run, those games with mods eat RAM for days.
So if it was me... well with a budget you are aiming for I would get R5 5600 for $240, some DDR4 ram (32GB FOR APPROX $120) and get an entry level am4 board that fits the rest of your budget. But that is me.
Oh definitely budget for an NVMe ssd even if you stick with Intel.
Jase2985:
@Batman:
you should get this and a 32gb ram kit, 16gb is costing you FPS in games
Show proof please, especially on a similar setup to the OP, not something running a RTX 4090 and a top end card trying to run cyberpunk at 4k or something like that.
Can you show proof please, because your statement is misleading
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |