Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




Human
2949 posts

Uber Geek

Subscriber

# 147076 8-Jun-2014 14:20
Send private message

My sister has decided she wants a new computer, something that can handle photoshop well (she's probably around the beginner/intermediate level). Anything will definitely be faster than her laptop though..

She gave me a price bracket of up to 2k, but to be honest, I think 2k is overkill for what she needs.

Are their any recommendations for prebuilt machines here? or should I go down the route of building one for her? 

Personally, I think around $1200 would be sufficient, but I could be wrong? I'm having a nosey around pricespy and put togethera rig that is likely faster than mine for around $1300, but I by no means have done much research.


So I guess questions are;

1. Are there any prebuild systems that would be worth looking at?
2. If not, is it worth just spending some time to BYO?





View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
1026 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 1061253 8-Jun-2014 14:26
One person supports this post
Send private message

Depends if that 2k is including a screen?

If you put a Decent screen such as Dell U2412M into the mix, That will take a fair chunk out of the budget alone, before even looking at the computer itself.

System wise I'd say go for:

16GB Ram
Core i5
240GB SSD (Bigger if your budget allows - They're cheap on amazon atm)
Mid Range Graphics card,

and spend decent $$ on a mound + Keyboard, Nothing worse than having a 2k system and a $40 keyboard and mouse combo.



Human
2949 posts

Uber Geek

Subscriber

  # 1061273 8-Jun-2014 14:50
Send private message

Andib: Depends if that 2k is including a screen?

If you put a Decent screen such as Dell U2412M into the mix, That will take a fair chunk out of the budget alone, before even looking at the computer itself.

System wise I'd say go for:

16GB Ram
Core i5
240GB SSD (Bigger if your budget allows - They're cheap on amazon atm)
Mid Range Graphics card,

and spend decent $$ on a mound + Keyboard, Nothing worse than having a 2k system and a $40 keyboard and mouse combo.



She won't need a huge screen to start with - if it puts the price up too much, I will likely just give her one we are getting rid of at work (17-19" wide) -bearing in mind she's been working on a 15" wide for the last few years on a laptop - she can upgrade this later if needed.


At this stage I'm only interesting in the system, but lets say 2k including screen.  

Problem is, when i'm building a PC, I build with future needs in mind, which tends to put it on the pricey side, so I'm finding this task a little difficult.

The 1300 I spoke of earlier included the following;

1. 256 SSD for OS and apps
2. 2TB HDD for storage
3. i7 4770 or i5 4670 (~80 price difference)
4. GTX 650 1GB or ATI 7750 (~$50 difference) 
5. Gigabyte GA-Z87X-D3H mobo (probably a bit OTT to be honest)
6. Thermaltake 600watt PSU 
7. Coolermaster case 
8. 8GB Ram (2x4GB)  (i'm lead to believe Photoshop is more CPU/GPU intensive, though happy to be corrected!)

Might take a look around the online stores on trademe to see if they have any decent prebuilt stuff..





 
 
 
 


5588 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1061434 8-Jun-2014 19:46
One person supports this post
Send private message

Aaroona:

...
1. 256 SSD for OS and apps
2. 2TB HDD for storage
3. i7 4770 or i5 4670 (~80 price difference)
4. GTX 650 1GB or ATI 7750 (~$50 difference) 
5. Gigabyte GA-Z87X-D3H mobo (probably a bit OTT to be honest)
6. Thermaltake 600watt PSU 
7. Coolermaster case 
8. 8GB Ram (2x4GB)  (i'm lead to believe Photoshop is more CPU/GPU intensive, though happy to be corrected!)



This is overkill for Photoshop work.
Spend less on the PC and more on the screen - you need (much) more than 19" for design work.




Sideface


6615 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


15557 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  # 1061480 8-Jun-2014 21:02
Send private message

Aaroona: She won't need a huge screen to start with - if it puts the price up too much, I will likely just give her one we are getting rid of at work (17-19" wide) -bearing in mind she's been working on a 15" wide for the last few years on a laptop - she can upgrade this later if needed.


At this stage I'm only interesting in the system, but lets say 2k including screen.  

Problem is, when i'm building a PC, I build with future needs in mind, which tends to put it on the pricey side, so I'm finding this task a little difficult.

The 1300 I spoke of earlier included the following;

1. 256 SSD for OS and apps
2. 2TB HDD for storage
3. i7 4770 or i5 4670 (~80 price difference)
4. GTX 650 1GB or ATI 7750 (~$50 difference) 
5. Gigabyte GA-Z87X-D3H mobo (probably a bit OTT to be honest)
6. Thermaltake 600watt PSU 
7. Coolermaster case 
8. 8GB Ram (2x4GB)  (i'm lead to believe Photoshop is more CPU/GPU intensive, though happy to be corrected!)

Might take a look around the online stores on trademe to see if they have any decent prebuilt stuff..


I'm a professional photographer and a computer guy. I think the previous configuration suggested is slightly better but they're pretty similar. Photoshop is very RAM and disk heavy, but generally doesn't use all that much CPU unless you're running weird filters that almost no-one uses. i5, 16GB RAM (or more depending on what they're doing), Samsung 840 SSD, hard disk for storage, and the video card is optional - if you get one nVidia is better supported, the 630 with 1GB of RAM is more than enough. The video card is more because it can use OpenGL to do useful things with zoom levels than performance, I'd get one since they're only $100. My computer is basically what I just described, works well, much better with SSD than before I had them - I have two plus three spinning disks. Don't forget backups, online and offsite.

Tell us what she's doing with it, it can make a difference. 50 layer 30 megapixels editing is different from light photo processing.

168 posts

Master Geek


  # 1061552 8-Jun-2014 22:40
One person supports this post
Send private message

Quick and simple
i5 not i7
As much ram as possibly 16GB or more, photoshop will uses as much as you can give it.
Don't skimp on screens, at the end of the day you want to be as accurate as you can afford

4552 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1061574 8-Jun-2014 23:40
Send private message

Is this for a professional use or just as a weekend hobby?

My list of priorities are:
1. Screen (>24")
2. RAM >16GB
3. NVIDIA cards (mid range)






 
 
 
 


15557 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  # 1061609 9-Jun-2014 07:45
Send private message

You don't need a huge screen for photo editing, I'm happy with 22 inch, I could afford much larger if I wanted it but don't.

2120 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1061616 9-Jun-2014 08:29
Send private message

As also a pro photographer who does a lot of retouching...

Here is my priority in ascending order.

Dell Ultrasharp line is the way to go for monitors, especially the premier colour range.  The premier colour come pre calibrated so you won't need to worry about calibration.   If you just go regular dell, 
16GB RAM
BIG SSD for working files/OS/apps (512GB)  You want 1/3rd or so of the SSD empty anyway to give it a longer life.
Big fast HDD assigned as OS cache/Photoshop scratch disk (to reduce writes on the SSD) and as long term photo storage.
Quad Core i5-i7 CPU (not so important as other poster said)
Nvidia GPU (use other posters example)  


If you don't have a calibrated monitor, you're going to have no certainty of what the final will look like.

Whatever side the SSD is you go for, set the system cache and the PS scratch disk to a regular mechanical HDD :)



226 posts

Master Geek


  # 1061638 9-Jun-2014 09:19
Send private message

macuser:
Whatever side the SSD is you go for, set the system cache and the PS scratch disk to a regular mechanical HDD :)

Why do you suggest this? I've been trying to spec a new system for our in house photographer.
Adobe seems to recommend putting scratch on the SSD as well.

2120 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1061664 9-Jun-2014 10:36
Send private message

robcreid:
macuser:
Whatever side the SSD is you go for, set the system cache and the PS scratch disk to a regular mechanical HDD :)

Why do you suggest this? I've been trying to spec a new system for our in house photographer.
Adobe seems to recommend putting scratch on the SSD as well.


Scratch disk is for when your Photoshop needs more ram than you have or have allocated, when this happens your SSD/HDD becomes your extra ram, SSD's have a finite number of writes before they fail (A huge number none-the-less, but caching/scratch disks are extremely write heavy).

Bottom line is that if client frequently needs more ram than installed, you will significantly reduce the life of an SSD if scratch is on SSD.  HDD's are not so much impacted by this problem, and are far cheaper to replace.

HDDs will also be a bit slower.  I think what adobe is suggesting is that you have another SSD as your scratch drive.  Maybe a 80GB one.

15557 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  # 1061675 9-Jun-2014 10:38
Send private message

I put swap, scratch, and cache on ssd, anywhere else is madness imho. They're the things you need on your fastest disk.

Someone on Facebook had recommended a quadra video card for Lightroom and retouching work, $700+. I've never seen anyone recommend this before and it doesn't sound right to me. Any thoughts?

2120 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1061676 9-Jun-2014 10:42
Send private message

timmmay: I put swap, scratch, and cache on ssd, anywhere else is madness imho. They're the things you need on your fastest disk.

Someone on Facebook had recommended a quadra video card for Lightroom and retouching work, $700+. I've never seen anyone recommend this before and it doesn't sound right to me. Any thoughts?


They're also the things that use your disk the most if you're short on RAM :( I would support that idea if it was on a separate SSD from your boot disk.

Quadro are CAD cards, unless you're doing 3D or video I doubt there will be a worth-they-money difference in performance.   

15557 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  # 1061706 9-Jun-2014 11:42
Send private message

macuser:
timmmay: I put swap, scratch, and cache on ssd, anywhere else is madness imho. They're the things you need on your fastest disk.

Someone on Facebook had recommended a quadra video card for Lightroom and retouching work, $700+. I've never seen anyone recommend this before and it doesn't sound right to me. Any thoughts?


They're also the things that use your disk the most if you're short on RAM :( I would support that idea if it was on a separate SSD from your boot disk.

Quadro are CAD cards, unless you're doing 3D or video I doubt there will be a worth-they-money difference in performance.   


Yip plenty of ram is important, but an ssd has good bandwidth so problems putting lots on it. I do personally use two ssds but given how fast modern ones are not sure it's necessary.

8035 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 1061846 9-Jun-2014 15:37
Send private message

I'm a fan of the Intel NUC's, I would look at:

Intel NUC D54250WYK (i5-4250U cpu, HD5000 gpu) ~$540
Kingston/Crucial/Other 2x8GB (16GB) DDR3L (L = low voltage aka 1.35) SO-DIMM ~$200
Intel/Samsung/Crucial 250GB mSATA SSD ~$250 (or 400-500GB can be had for $380-400)
Total ~$1000

Leaving decent budget for nice monitor eg: Dell Ultrasharp, Windows 8.1 license, accessories (mouse, keyboard) etc.









 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter and LinkedIn »



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Netflix releases 21 Studio Ghibli works
Posted 22-Jan-2020 11:42


Vodafone integrates eSIM into device and wearable roadmap
Posted 17-Jan-2020 09:45


Do you need this camera app? Group investigates privacy implications
Posted 16-Jan-2020 03:30


JBL launches headphones range designed for gaming
Posted 13-Jan-2020 09:59


Withings introduces ScanWatch wearable combining ECG and sleep apnea detection
Posted 9-Jan-2020 18:34


NZ Police releases public app
Posted 8-Jan-2020 11:43


Suunto 7 combine sports and smart features on new smartwatch generation
Posted 7-Jan-2020 16:06


Intel brings innovation with technology spanning the cloud, network, edge and PC
Posted 7-Jan-2020 15:54


AMD announces high performance desktop and ultrathin laptop processors
Posted 7-Jan-2020 15:42


AMD unveils four new desktop and mobile GPUs including AMD Radeon RX 5600
Posted 7-Jan-2020 15:32


Consolidation in video streaming market with Spark selling Lightbox to Sky
Posted 19-Dec-2019 09:09


Intel introduces cryogenic control chip to enable quantum computers
Posted 10-Dec-2019 21:32


Vodafone 5G service live in four cities
Posted 10-Dec-2019 08:30


Samsung Galaxy Fold now available in New Zealand
Posted 6-Dec-2019 00:01


NZ company oDocs awarded US$ 100,000 Dubai World Expo grant
Posted 5-Dec-2019 16:00



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.