Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




2 posts

Wannabe Geek


Topic # 15282 14-Aug-2007 03:11
Send private message

Is it true that a 22" monitor has the same number of pixels as a 20" and therefore less dots per sq in than a 20".  Does that mean a 20" is a sharper picture and you'd need to go to a 24" to get equally sharp picture as a 20". What is the best 22"?
HP2207 vs Samsung 226BW or LG 22" monitor. Is there a value priced 24"?  What do you recommend?

Create new topic
424 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 2


  Reply # 82314 14-Aug-2007 11:15
Send private message

Having a look at pricespy http://www.pricespy.co.nz 22" monitors are generally 1680x1050, 20" are usually the same so yes you are correct.  But in terms of "sharpness"  it depends on your definition of sharpness.  I would buy the bigger display, as the pixels are bigger and easier to see, less likelihood of eyestrain.  As for which brand to buy, sorry but I've got no idea. 

As for a 24 inch display, Dell 24 inch diplays always get 9/10 in magazine test reviews, so maybe you'd consider them.  Be aware though that when buying a Dell component, that the price varies in a generally cyclical manner, with a high price, then high with freebies, then a low price, then high again.  The whole cycle time seems to be about 6 weeks (by memory).

144 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 3


  Reply # 82332 14-Aug-2007 13:54
Send private message

I have a 22" viewsonic.

All 22" are TN 6 bit panels, and arnt that solid or great at colour accuracy, great for games/windows, but including the low pixel density & 6bitness not great for photography.

Better panels are a lot more $ tho.

 
 
 
 


1240 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  Reply # 82353 14-Aug-2007 16:07
Send private message

Personally I would go for the cheapest. I see no point in paying more for the same amount of pixels.



2 posts

Wannabe Geek


  Reply # 82566 16-Aug-2007 01:45
Send private message

Thanks for all your replies - they raise some more questions:
Could someone elaborate a bit on the reference to TN panel 6 pin being the format used on all 22".  What is the alternative format that would, I assume be better (and in what way is it better).  I assume this other format is available on 20" and 24".

Secondly - one of the repliers or my posted question said that althought there are the same number of pixels in 22 as 20 they are bigger as opposed to what my concern was ie that there were simply less per sq in.  And finally if so what are the pro and cons of bigger pixels as opposed to higher density of smaller.  
Stefan


Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Geekzone Live »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.