|
|
|
Mark:About 350M if I went in a straight line, if I went around the borders it would be a fair bit more! I've love a hard line to the property though :-)
InstallerUFB:
A copper (UTP) connection would require additional isolation network equipement at at least one end, as I would expect that the two buildings don't share common Power distribution and earthing.
woollettg:InstallerUFB:
A copper (UTP) connection would require additional isolation network equipement at at least one end, as I would expect that the two buildings don't share common Power distribution and earthing.
Not entirely true. Most ethernet cards have an isolating transformer giving up to 2kv isolation. There are transformer-less ones about but most have isolating magnetics. It won't save you if it gets struck by lightning though.
Have a look at these -
http://www.ebay.com/itm/BV-Tech-1-Port-60W-100mbps-Power-Over-Ethernet-Network-Repeater-Adapter-RP101-/261232817009?pt=US_Networking_Boosters_Extenders_Antennas&hash=item3cd2b07371
Or if you want to spend more this -
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Startech-10-100-VDSL2-Ethernet-Extender-Kit-over-Single-Pair-Wire-1km-/350911929067?pt=US_Networking_Boosters_Extenders_Antennas&hash=item51b3fb1aeb
chevrolux: Is there a phone line between the buildings?
Those VDSL extenders posted above would be the ideal solution if there is. Just need to establish a clean pair between the buildings, whack the VDSL converters on and you are away. You can even send the POTS down with it on the same pair.
Wouldn't recommend though if the cable between houses is open aerial though. That will be rubbish.
Other than that you need to look at sticking a pole up to get clean line of sight. Wireless will be crap without LOS and I would never even try with trees that thick.
Ubiquiti NanoStation (or the new NanoBeam) will absolutely smash a link that short
*Insert big spe*dtest result here*
andrewNZ:![]()
Line of sight
Sony
|
|
|