Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 
Biglegs

53 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 12

Subscriber

  #3272860 17-Aug-2024 13:38
Send private message

I have about 62 devices hanging off 4 Unifi APs  (A long house with a double brick wall down the centre).

 

There a mix of WiFi controlled heat pumps (they are my canaries!  They start reporting connectivity errors and refuse to operate when things are about to take a turn for the worse.)  The rest are IOT lights and switches, a few rings cameras, 3 smart TVs, and of course a couple of laptops and mobiles.  And we often have guests around using our network too.

 

Whilst I might be ahead of the curve for a typical household, this is the way things are heading, and ISPs should IMHO be able to cope with it.




RunningMan
9189 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4842


  #3272862 17-Aug-2024 13:53
Send private message

62 devices seems high, but not unduly so, especially given IoT devices shouldn't have a whole heap of concurrent outside connections open.


noroad
1025 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 675

Trusted

  #3272913 17-Aug-2024 14:50
Send private message

 

 

62 devices seems high, but not unduly so, especially given IoT devices shouldn't have a whole heap of concurrent outside connections open.

 

 

 

 

On the Unify, can you log in to the cli and see how many nat connections you have? I know little about Unify but I would expect this should be possible.

 

 




cddt
1970 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1905


  #3272929 17-Aug-2024 16:08
Send private message

Biglegs:

 

Unsurprisingly this seems to have worked, the connection is solid as a rock.  The question for me now is if CGNAT doesn't deliver for all its customers, should I have to pay for an IP address to fix it?   I have no desire to expose internal services to the wider internet and would be quite happy with a CGNAT solution - sol long as it worked reliably.  Apparently it doesn't.

 

 

The problem is that CGNAT probably does deliver for the vast majority of their customers. As an outlier it's probably easier for both you and them if you either pay for a static IP or move to a provider where it's included (one-off fee). 





My referral links: BigPipeMercury


cyril7
9075 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2499

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #3272961 17-Aug-2024 18:26
Send private message

Hi many ISPs provide public IPs that are not static but will change from time to time, regardless those connections will not be impacted by Nat overload overload issues that a cgnat connection can be as discussed here and they are not charged for as they are not static.

Cyril

RunningMan
9189 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4842


  #3272964 17-Aug-2024 18:41
Send private message

CGNAT might be a red herring given @nztim is seeing the same issue and has a public IPv4.


 
 
 

Shop now on AliExpress (affiliate link).
Biglegs

53 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 12

Subscriber

  #3278606 3-Sep-2024 17:37
Send private message

Here's a final update on this issue for those that are interested or may discover this thread.

 

Since switching to a static IP, the router has been up without a single hiccup for 4 weeks and 1 day. I contacted tech support at the end of the month as requested, and they agreed that it was highly likely that CGNAT was not coping with the high number of device connections.  They could not offer classic DHCP, so static was the only option to guarantee a stable connection.  I pointed out I had no need for a static IP, only a stable connection. I also pointed out that whilst I might be an outlier at this point in time, it may certainly become the norm in the near future so they would eventually need to adapt.

 

After a conversation with their escalation team, it was agreed to continue the free static IP for 12 months, after which we'd review again.  I will seriously do that.  Who knows - there may be changes to CGNAT by then.


nztim
4015 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2713

ID Verified
Trusted
TEAMnetwork
Subscriber

  #3278619 3-Sep-2024 19:22
Send private message

2degrees need a public dynamic ip option

 

Sky broadband is the same price and uses the 2degrees network





Any views expressed on these forums are my own and don't necessarily reflect those of my employer. 


aj6828
177 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 47

ID Verified
Trusted

  #3278665 3-Sep-2024 21:55
Send private message

nztim:

 

2degrees need a public dynamic ip option

 

Sky broadband is the same price and uses the 2degrees network

 

 

 

 

2d has a dynamic option.

 

i  sell 2d broadband as a reseller all the connections i provision are dynamic non cgnat by default on my stack..





Exclusive for Geekzone Members!
Dynamic IP & Bring Your Own Device Hyperfibre & Fibre plans & NO Contracts with Hyperline.co.nz powered by ASN 9790 Network

 

Chrous areas only HYPERLINE.co.nz  


nztim
4015 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2713

ID Verified
Trusted
TEAMnetwork
Subscriber

  #3278674 3-Sep-2024 23:15
Send private message

aj6828:

 

2d has a dynamic option.

 

i  sell 2d broadband as a reseller all the connections i provision are dynamic non cgnat by default on my stack..

 

 

I am with Sky, who re-sell 2degress, same deal, but 2degress don't offer public dynamic direct to their own residential customers





Any views expressed on these forums are my own and don't necessarily reflect those of my employer. 


1 | 2 | 3 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.