Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


3504 posts

Uber Geek


#116658 6-May-2013 10:22
Send private message

My current home network setup is something like this:

Until recently I had the truenet probe where the WR1043ND is now sitting. But the truenet probe is not gigE and the wifi doesn't seem all that reliable so I want to replace it with the WR1043ND, which I no longer use since getting the Fritzbox.   The WR1043ND is running Gargoyle from when I used to run it with a half-bridged ADSL modem so I've left that on it, but I can reflash it to factory firmware if that's better.

Physically  the Fritzbox and WR1043ND are at opposite ends of the house, so I have wifi turned on both of them and matching SSIDs and passwords, which I think should let wifi devices roam from one to the other, is this correct? this gives me full coverage of the whole house for wireless.

On the WR1043ND I have internet / WAN disabled and nothing plugged into the WAN port.  Everything is using the gigE ports.   Effectively I just want to use it as an access point / switch. 

DHCP is off on both Fritzbox and WR1043ND and handled by the Amahi home server. 

With everything setup like this I haven't noticed issues, but I've only just recently done it and am also curious....  so my questions: 

1) Will this setup result in double NAT for the devices connecting to the WR1043ND?
2) If so what are the options for avoiding this?
3) Are there better ways to connect everything? (Preferably without buying anything new or additional wiring ;-) )

"I was born not knowing and have had only a little time to change that here and there."         | Electric Kiwi | Sharesies
              - Richard Feynman

Create new topic
454 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #812538 7-May-2013 09:59
Send private message

Sounds good to me, I don't see how you could get a double nat with that setup. With the WiFi the only recommendation I would make is to ensure that the two access points are using different channels (preferably a long way apart, eg 6 and 11) so that they don't interfere with each other at the places where coverage overlaps. You'll get momentary loss of signal as a client device decides to roam between APs.

Warning: reality may differ from above post

Create new topic

News »

Nanoleaf enhances lighting line with launch of Triangles and Mini Triangles
Posted 17-Oct-2020 20:18

Synology unveils DS1621+ 
Posted 17-Oct-2020 20:12

Ingram Micro introduces FootfallCam to New Zealand channel
Posted 17-Oct-2020 20:06

Dropbox adopts Virtual First working policy
Posted 17-Oct-2020 19:47

OPPO announces Reno4 Series 5G line-up in NZ
Posted 16-Oct-2020 08:52

Microsoft Highway to a Hundred expands to Asia Pacific
Posted 14-Oct-2020 09:34

Spark turns on 5G in Auckland
Posted 14-Oct-2020 09:29

AMD Launches AMD Ryzen 5000 Series Desktop Processors
Posted 9-Oct-2020 10:13

Teletrac Navman launches integrated multi-camera solution for transport and logistics industry
Posted 8-Oct-2020 10:57

Farmside hits 10,000 RBI customers
Posted 7-Oct-2020 15:32

NordVPN starts deploying colocated servers
Posted 7-Oct-2020 09:00

Google introduces Nest Wifi routers in New Zealand
Posted 7-Oct-2020 05:00

Orcon to bundle Google Nest Wifi router with new accounts
Posted 7-Oct-2020 05:00

Epay and Centrapay partner to create digital gift cards
Posted 2-Oct-2020 17:34

Inseego launches 5G MiFi M2000 mobile hotspot
Posted 2-Oct-2020 14:53

Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.

Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron

Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.