Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




15 posts

Geek


Topic # 143815 28-Apr-2014 13:27
Send private message

Does anybody know of any load balancing techniques similar to Cisco Server Load Balancing (SLB) that would run on low end routers or switches. The models available to me are Cisco Router 2611 and Cisco Switch 2950

Any help would be awesome guys
Thanks in advance :D 

View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
Infrastructure Geek
4043 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 193

Trusted
Microsoft NZ
Subscriber

  Reply # 1032561 28-Apr-2014 14:12
Send private message

what are you trying to achieve?  load balancing of a couple of web servers?



15 posts

Geek


  Reply # 1032599 28-Apr-2014 14:35
Send private message

Sorry i should have explained first. I have 2 PCs and each has a storage server, both servers will have the same address. What i want to achieve, is when a user connects to the server the router or switch will send it to ether of the 2 servers. this can happen in an ordered method or a random method as long as the user connects to a different server each time.

 
 
 
 


2489 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 919

Subscriber

  Reply # 1032603 28-Apr-2014 14:40
Send private message

just create multiple DNS entries?




Windows 7 x64 // i5-3570K // 16GB DDR3-1600 // GTX660Ti 2GB // Samsung 830 120GB SSD // OCZ Agility4 120GB SSD // Samsung U28D590D @ 3840x2160 & Asus PB278Q @ 2560x1440
Samsung Galaxy S5 SM-G900I w/Spark

956 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 346
Inactive user


  Reply # 1032607 28-Apr-2014 14:56
Send private message

Not really feasible load balancing storage with a load balancing device, how will you replicate writes from one server to another for example?

You might as well look at DFS instead



15 posts

Geek


  Reply # 1032609 28-Apr-2014 15:06
Send private message

I was think of have both PCs back up to a 3rd PC then do a reverse back up from the 3rd PC to both servers

I fix stuff!
1566 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 249

Trusted
Vocus
Subscriber

  Reply # 1032614 28-Apr-2014 15:10
Send private message

Buy an F5 off Ebay ( they are quite cheap for a 3400 LTM). You will never look back.


2090 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 848


  Reply # 1032636 28-Apr-2014 15:44
Send private message

what protocols are you actually attempting to load balance?

HTTP/HTTPS?
SMB/CIFS?
FTP/SFTP?

If you want to load balance you need to worry about persistence, load balancing methods and other things - dependent on protocol. Also what do you have for ensuring your storage is all replicated and up to date?





15 posts

Geek


  Reply # 1032650 28-Apr-2014 15:53
Send private message

Thank you, unfortunately I am not able to buy one its part of my Uni assignment. I was really hoping i would be able to use the equipment available to me.

I am using scripts running periodically to ensure everything remains the same across the servers.

I want to ensure that if multiple users are connect to the server that the users are spread out evenly amongst the servers

2090 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 848


  Reply # 1032657 28-Apr-2014 16:06
Send private message

So again - what protocol?

You have software options for certain protocols.

a 2950 won't do it, nor will a 2600 series router.

I fix stuff!
1566 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 249

Trusted
Vocus
Subscriber

  Reply # 1032660 28-Apr-2014 16:15
Send private message

You are best to give each server its own IP address, and then use DNS to have 2 A records for the domain name. Its fairly cruid, and if one server goes down, 50% of your users will get timeouts.

With your networking kit, its not possible to load balance with. You need specialized kit to do that.


1198 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 110


  Reply # 1032698 28-Apr-2014 17:25
Send private message

In windows you have NLB and also clustering, these may be easier options to use over hardware assisted solutions. Of course I recommends a little light reading before deciding on the ideal solution.




Software Engineer

 


13346 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2247

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1032712 28-Apr-2014 17:37
Send private message

Load balancing at that tier is kinda unusual. Usually you would scale storage up, not out, because you'll need to replicate. If it was mostly read that would be different, as then server sync wouldn't be so much of an overhead, but if you're writing to both a lot then the inter-server traffic will almost negate the benefit.

How about taking a step back and telling us what you're trying to achieve. 




AWS Certified Solution Architect Professional, Sysop Administrator Associate, and Developer Associate
TOGAF certified enterprise architect
Professional photographer


2242 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 353

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1032717 28-Apr-2014 17:50
Send private message

Sounddude: Buy an F5 off Ebay ( they are quite cheap for a 3400 LTM). You will never look back.



I've got both LTMs and GTMs, and would have to agree! Even had a virtual appliance LTM too at one stage.


^OP
But load balancing storage... might be over thinking it it a little. DFS or GlusterFS sounds like the way to go for this one.






Infrastructure Geek
4043 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 193

Trusted
Microsoft NZ
Subscriber

  Reply # 1032805 28-Apr-2014 20:24
Send private message

Windows Server 2012 R2 also has a feature called "Scale out file server".  You can create a two node storage array where clients will be redirected to the best node, or may even pull data from all nodes at once.  If you're interested in learning a few more features, there is a competition on Geekzone which has a learning element to it, which happens to be about the new storage features in WS2012R2 :) see http://www.geekzone.co.nz/forums.asp?forumid=48&topicid=143681



15 posts

Geek


  Reply # 1033117 29-Apr-2014 12:11
Send private message

Thanks for all the feedback 

I'm doing a project at MIT and i am using Owncloud as private storage. I was thinking of having 2 instances of Owncloud on 2 different PCs but i want there data to be made available to any user regardless of the instance they connect to. I also want the client to be able to connect to ether of the instances randomly. If one instance were to fail i would like the other to take over automatically. That's why i was think if they were both active and you could connect to ether one of them and the data is the same on both instances of Owncloud it wouldn't matter if one were to fail because you should be able to be redirected to the other.

 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

UAV Traffic Management Trial launching today in New Zealand
Posted 12-Dec-2017 16:06


UFB connections pass 460,000
Posted 11-Dec-2017 11:26


The Warehouse Group to adopt IBM Cloud to support digital transformation
Posted 11-Dec-2017 11:22


Dimension Data peeks into digital business 2018
Posted 11-Dec-2017 10:55


2018 Cyber Security Predictions
Posted 7-Dec-2017 14:55


Global Govtech Accelerator to drive public sector innovation in Wellington
Posted 7-Dec-2017 11:21


Stuff Pix media strategy a new direction
Posted 7-Dec-2017 09:37


Digital transformation is dead
Posted 7-Dec-2017 09:31


Fake news and cyber security
Posted 7-Dec-2017 09:27


Dimension Data New Zealand strengthens cybersecurity practice
Posted 5-Dec-2017 20:27


Epson NZ launches new Expression Premium Photo range
Posted 5-Dec-2017 20:26


Eventbrite and Twickets launch integration partnership in Australia and New Zealand
Posted 5-Dec-2017 20:23


New Fujifilm macro lens lands in New Zealand
Posted 5-Dec-2017 20:16


Cyber security not being taken seriously enough
Posted 5-Dec-2017 20:13


Sony commences Android 8.0 Oreo rollout in New Zealand
Posted 5-Dec-2017 20:08



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.