there will be 17 fixed nodes on the network and a few dozen mobile devices.
mesh topography for the fixed nodes and star topography for the mobile devices is forseen.
what hardware/software solutions will render this vision possible?
there will be 17 fixed nodes on the network and a few dozen mobile devices.
mesh topography for the fixed nodes and star topography for the mobile devices is forseen.
what hardware/software solutions will render this vision possible?
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
i care about building a robust network, not the fastest one.
networkn: Wireless and Robust should only be in the same sentence if the words "is" and "not" are also in that same sentence.
If you want reliability, security and or performance, cables.
Mirddes: 0 cabled APs. AP is a cellphone.
sbiddle:Mirddes: 0 cabled APs. AP is a cellphone.
You've completely lost me there.
Mirddes: to be fair, terrible performance on 802.11ac sounds livable. i care about building a robust network, not the fastest one.
noroad: Well, I have not tried it with WDS (yes it does have WDS with AP as a mode option) but I use this AP http://www.dlink.com/me/sr/business-solutions/wireless/access-points/access-points/dap-2695-wireless-ac1750-simultaneous-dualband-poe-access-point and it is simply awesome in its performance and coverage.
anyhow, meshing 802.11ac, how do we go about this? (im not wanting WDS so much, this is still star topography)
Mirddes: anyhow, meshing 802.11ac, how do we go about this? (im not wanting WDS so much, this is still star topography)
let us be generous as to be conducive to productivity.
half the nodes are wired, half are not.
now what?
Mirddes: you have no sense of vision. if basic internet connectivity can be achieved, what do you care for my blood, sweet and tears? multiple internet connections on the mesh is a given. being able to failover to a cellphone is a luxury.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |