Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


MichaelNZ

1594 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 485

Trusted
Net Trust Ltd

#302983 8-Jan-2023 21:29
Send private message

I've read in multiple places the recommended minimum distance for single mode is 2 metres and yet there are 0.5 and 1m patch leads available. I've gone down to 1 metre in production without issues but wondering if I should be using 2+ metres for best practice.

 

Can someone knowledgeable please shed some light on this?





WFH Linux Systems and Networks Engineer in the Internet industry | Specialising in Mikrotik | APNIC member | Open to job offers | ZL2NET


Create new topic
BarTender
3629 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2572

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #3018792 8-Jan-2023 22:55
Send private message

I have never had a problem with 10gb short runs. But price wise getting a direct attached copper back to back SFP+ is way cheaper if you don’t need them to be electrically isolated from each other and the SFPs are supported in both devices.

Something like this, but there are many options like this.

https://www.pbtech.co.nz/product/CABLTE1010/Generic-compatible-1m-3ft-10G-SFP-Passive-Direct-A



Tinkerisk
4798 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3660


  #3018794 8-Jan-2023 23:10
Send private message

Same for me for 1m, but for short lengths (30cm upwards) I use passive 10Gb/s DACs as well (when possible). What I can imagine is that with very short optical fibre length, the strength of the light waves reflected from the ends is so strong that optical interference can occur and the receiver cannot cope with it.





- NET: FTTH & VDSL, OPNsense, 10G backbone, GWN APs
- SRV: 12 RU HA server cluster, 0.1 PB storage on premise
- IoT:   thread, zigbee, tasmota, BidCoS, LoRa, WX suite, IR
- 3D:    two 3D printers, 3D scanner, CNC router, laser cutter


Mehrts
1112 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 984

Trusted

  #3018878 9-Jan-2023 09:20
Send private message

+1 for using DAC cables for short runs (typically within rack) that don't require electrical isolation.




MichaelNZ

1594 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 485

Trusted
Net Trust Ltd

  #3018937 9-Jan-2023 12:10
Send private message

Thanks for the responses.

 

I am sticking with optics now due to standardisation and also because the DAC's are apparently not supported on all hardware.

 

I have decided to get a 2 metre cable.





WFH Linux Systems and Networks Engineer in the Internet industry | Specialising in Mikrotik | APNIC member | Open to job offers | ZL2NET


cyril7
9075 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2499

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #3019008 9-Jan-2023 13:54
Send private message

Hi, its typically considered a 2m run is the recommended shortest between transcievers. If you have a 1km run and a couple of 0.5 or 1m fly leads at each end, those 0.5 and 1m leads make sense.

 

Cyril


nitro
757 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 335


  #3019134 9-Jan-2023 16:02
Send private message

MichaelNZ:

 

I've read in multiple places the recommended minimum distance for single mode is 2 metres and yet there are 0.5 and 1m patch leads available. I've gone down to 1 metre in production without issues but wondering if I should be using 2+ metres for best practice.

 

Can someone knowledgeable please shed some light on this?

 

 

2m minimum came from how 802.3ae specified the 'minimum range', e.g. minimum '2-300 meters' for devices that can be used for 500m. I must confess I haven't looked at the standards in a while.

 

there are obviously different types of sfp/sfp+ adaptors, but we have used 0.5m an 0.3m cables in test. We even have a few 0.2m between gigabit SFPs.

 

 


 
 
 

Shop on-line at New World now for your groceries (affiliate link).
FailedWOF
48 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 28


  #3022900 17-Jan-2023 18:27
Send private message

For short runs you generally use multimode fibre or DACs. Single mode runs less than 2m end to end can work as long as the TX power is lower than the receiver sensitivity. This will normally be the case as long as you're using -LR (<10km) transceivers on both sides. Using -ER or higher over short distances will burn out the optics. But really, why worry? If you want to use SMF (and you have -LR SMF transceivers) just get a 2m OS2 patch cable and loop the excess.

 

Total cost per metre is the more relevant factor. When you account for the transceivers at either end, plus the cable, I've found the breakover point between MMF and SMF to be about 15m. Less than that, the higher per meter cost of MMF cable is offset by the cheaper transceivers. Above that, SMF transceivers are more expensive, but SMF cable is cheaper per metre. For only a couple of metres, DACs are the cheapest option but requires common compatibility on both ends. In my case, inter switch links are DACs ($19 for 0.5m passive twinax), devices to switches within the rack are MMF, and between the house comms rack and the garage rack I use SMF.

 

  • In-rack

     

    • With MM 

       

      • 2x 10GBASE-SR MMF SFP+ = $70
      • 3m OM4 = $11
      • $27/m
    • With SM

       

      • 2x 10GBASE-LR SMF SFP+ = $94
      • 3m OS2 = $8.50
      • $34/m

 

 

  • House to garage

     

    • With MM 

       

      • 2x 10GBASE-SR MMF SFP+ = $70
      • 20m OM4 = $45
      • $5.75/m
    • With SM

       

      • 2x 10GBASE-LR SMF SFP+ = $94
      • 20m OS2 = $19
      • $5.65/m

Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.