Lif3 Smartchip (Anti-Radiation for iPhone) @ Harvey Norman

Forums › Gadgets, robotics, home automation, electronics (including wearables) › Lif3 Smartchip (Anti-Radiation for iPhone) @ Harvey Norman

1 | 2

hyperman

418 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 101

#1678099 26-Nov-2016 22:22

Even a half baked redkneck should be able to understand for anything like this to work it has to be a reflector....

thus would need to be on the screen side of the phone!
even more stupid it is on the bottom of the phone not up the top where the antennae are, and also the closest point to your head.....

2 out of 10 for dumb effort

The views expressed by me are not necessarily those of my employer

Yabanize

2351 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 583

#1678104 26-Nov-2016 23:03

If their claims aren't true, a FTA complaint too?

Sam91

620 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 183

#1678108 27-Nov-2016 00:02

Remember Power Balance? This product just reminded me of them. Based on Power Balance's success, I'm sure these will sell well.

We had a traveller stay with us for a few months. He slept in the same room as the router. He believed that Wi-Fi is really dangerous and made him feel sick. I had to turn the router off each night.

Batman

Mad Scientist
30012 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6217

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#1678109 27-Nov-2016 00:07

Sam91: Remember Power Balance? This product just reminded me of them. Based on Power Balance's success, I'm sure these will sell well.

We had a traveller stay with us for a few months. He slept in the same room as the router. He believed that Wi-Fi is really dangerous and made him feel sick. I had to turn the router off each night.

That's called the nocebo effect. It's real!

mugs2000

66 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 28
Inactive user

#1678166 27-Nov-2016 10:02

Looking deeper into their claims, it appears that the tests were performed in China, not Australia and the radiation levels were certainly not reduced by 95%, some levels were actually increased, while others were reduced marginally. Possibly random noise? not sure about that, and test results for some phones returned a 404 error.

meesham

973 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 267

#1678185 27-Nov-2016 11:32

Sam91:

We had a traveller stay with us for a few months. He slept in the same room as the router. He believed that Wi-Fi is really dangerous and made him feel sick. I had to turn the router off each night.

I'd be switching my router into no-lights mode and doing some testing on him (that's what travellers are for, right?)

Lenovo

Shop now for Lenovo laptops and other devices (affiliate link).

richms

29098 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10209

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#1678196 27-Nov-2016 11:49

meesham:

Sam91:

We had a traveller stay with us for a few months. He slept in the same room as the router. He believed that Wi-Fi is really dangerous and made him feel sick. I had to turn the router off each night.

I'd be switching my router into no-lights mode and doing some testing on him (that's what travellers are for, right?)

I would be telling them to GTFO with their hippy BS.

And why are people sleeping in your server room?

Richard rich.ms

Yabanize

2351 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 583

#1678220 27-Nov-2016 12:47

Whirlpool thread about it

Reddit thread

neb

11294 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10018

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#1678446 27-Nov-2016 18:12

richms:
And why are people sleeping in your server room?

The correct form of the question is actually "Why is your server in the guest bedroom?".

1 | 2