Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


sdav

846 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 193


#269895 13-Apr-2020 12:48
Send private message

Hey all,

 

I've been thinking about my inverter microwave because at home we had a discussion about it... It must be day 19 of level 4.

 

Anyway, my question is around the electronics side of inverter microwaves and clarifying the meaning of inverter in a microwave. This is my basic understanding so far.

 

The inverter microwave converts AC wall power to DC inside the inverter circuit. This provides the magnetron with a constant power at various levels and enables even cooking. I get that bit (I think!). What stumps me is why are they called inverter microwaves? Doesn't inverting only apply when converting AC > DC and not the other way round? Is it a different use of the word inverter that I'm unaware of?

 

I tried to look for a simple explanation of this but wasn't easily able to figure it out.

 

Thanks all.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
sidefx
3775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1295

Trusted

  #2460486 13-Apr-2020 12:55
Send private message

because a "Rectifying Microwave" sounds funny?  ;-)

 

 

 

EDIT: Facetiousness aside, this actually looks like it has a pretty good explaination: https://media.datatail.com/docs/manual/371449_en.pdf

 

Looks like the inverter bit of the name refers to what they do after rectifying the AC to DC. 





"I was born not knowing and have had only a little time to change that here and there."         | Octopus Energy | Sharesies
              - Richard Feynman




JeremyNzl
361 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 74


  #2460490 13-Apr-2020 12:59
Send private message

Happy to be wrong, 

 

I understood the non inverter models would do reduced wattage at full power with a shorter on cycle. The inverter offers a more consistent result, that is tuned to the power setting required. 


boosacnoodle
1269 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 855


  #2460528 13-Apr-2020 13:59
Send private message

I find the performance to be much better with even cooking. The model I have also has no physical moving parts inside and so is much easier to clean. It's a commercial model.




Delphinus
611 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 274


  #2460532 13-Apr-2020 14:03
Send private message

JeremyNzl:

 

Happy to be wrong, 

 

I understood the non inverter models would do reduced wattage at full power with a shorter on cycle. The inverter offers a more consistent result, that is tuned to the power setting required. 

 

 

Based on my porridge observations I would back this up. Cooking porridge in an old one a while ago I would put it on 50% power and watch it going full blast with the porridge boiling/rising in my bowl, then the tone of the microwave would change for 5-10 seconds and the porridge lava would subside, until the tone changed again back to full power.


richms
29098 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10208

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2460536 13-Apr-2020 14:07
Send private message

Delphinus:

 

Based on my porridge observations I would back this up. Cooking porridge in an old one a while ago I would put it on 50% power and watch it going full blast with the porridge boiling/rising in my bowl, then the tone of the microwave would change for 5-10 seconds and the porridge lava would subside, until the tone changed again back to full power.

 

 

Yeah, they constantly are switching with high startup loads so really hard on generators etc, with that old fashioned magnetic transformer they are really hard for inverters to drive too. Im guessing they picked up on the name inverter from other things that use it like fridges and aircons where it means much better efficiency and control vs old induction motor type things.





Richard rich.ms

TwoSeven
1712 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 304

Subscriber

  #2460561 13-Apr-2020 15:17
Send private message

I understood the inverter part refers to dc input inverter rather than a transformer, the output is fed into a cavity magnetron.

 

I am not an electronics person but I believe them to be pwm inverters.

 

 





Software Engineer
   (the practice of real science, engineering and management)
A.I.  (Automation rebranded)
Gender Neutral
   (a person who believes in equality and who does not believe in/use stereotypes. Examples such as gender, binary, nonbinary, male/female etc.)

 

 ...they/their/them...


 
 
 

Shop now on AliExpress (affiliate link).
frankv
5705 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3666

Lifetime subscriber

  #2460605 13-Apr-2020 15:40
Send private message

An inverter in common parlance converts DC to AC, not vice versa. Apparently these microwaves have an inverter instead of a transformer. I suspect this has something to do with oscillating at microwave frequencies. And they use substantially less electricity. (For us old timers, the original microwaves were amazing because they used so little electricity).

From Panasonic's website, it appears that an inverter microwave can reduce its output power somehow, whereas non-inverter microwaves are just on/off, and they approximate the desired power level by turning on for a few seconds, then off (Pulse Width Modulation in techspeak).

sdav

846 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 193


  #2460616 13-Apr-2020 15:50
Send private message

sidefx:

because a "Rectifying Microwave" sounds funny?  ;-)


 


EDIT: Facetiousness aside, this actually looks like it has a pretty good explaination: https://media.datatail.com/docs/manual/371449_en.pdf


Looks like the inverter bit of the name refers to what they do after rectifying the AC to DC. 



Thank you, I did actually see that article and agree, it was super helpful. It was obviously aimed at someone that knew what all those terms meant so I thought I would double check my understanding. Essentially, there is converting and rectifying happening to the AC signal but no inverting? Why would a DC signal need inversion after rectifying? My assumption is the other components require a signal that the inverter can supply that rectifying cannot.

Agree “rectifying microwave” or “converting microwave” might sound a bit strange in the marketing department!

Thanks as always for the replies folks.

sidefx
3775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1295

Trusted

  #2460869 14-Apr-2020 08:10
Send private message

sdav:

Thank you, I did actually see that article and agree, it was super helpful. It was obviously aimed at someone that knew what all those terms meant so I thought I would double check my understanding. Essentially, there is converting and rectifying happening to the AC signal but no inverting? Why would a DC signal need inversion after rectifying? My assumption is the other components require a signal that the inverter can supply that rectifying cannot.

 

 

 

Based on the diagram on the beginning of page 3 (figure 1) and some of the wording, I think they rectify to DC, then re-invert but to the frequency required by the magnetron (instead of using the standard 50 or 60 Hz you get from the grid combined with a transformer?) - this allows them to drive the magnetron continuously at different power levels instead of the transformer + start\stop approach used by conventional microwave?

 

 

 

Disclaimer: No idea if this is right; I studied electrical engineering over 20 years ago but have not done a thing in it since ;-)





"I was born not knowing and have had only a little time to change that here and there."         | Octopus Energy | Sharesies
              - Richard Feynman


SomeoneSomewhere
1882 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1086

Lifetime subscriber

  #2460984 14-Apr-2020 12:27
Send private message

My understanding is that to vary the power output of the magnetron, you need variable frequency AC. So the power flow is mains DC > rectifier > DC bus > inverter > variable frequency AC > transformer > magnetron.

 

 

 

Designing for an output frequency in the kHz allows the transformer to be much smaller for the same power frequency, as long as the magnetron is also designed for the same frequency range.

 

 

 

This is the same as other electrical equipment described as 'inverter', particularly aircon units. They output a variable-voltage variable-frequency (VVVF) supply to the motors allowing efficient slower-speed operation. Again, mains > rectifier > DC bus > inverter > load. They also have the advantage of generating 3P AC from a single phase source.


TwoSeven
1712 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 304

Subscriber

  #2461004 14-Apr-2020 12:40
Send private message

I understand cavity magnetrons use pulsed dc (or sometimes rectified ac).

 

 





Software Engineer
   (the practice of real science, engineering and management)
A.I.  (Automation rebranded)
Gender Neutral
   (a person who believes in equality and who does not believe in/use stereotypes. Examples such as gender, binary, nonbinary, male/female etc.)

 

 ...they/their/them...


 
 
 
 

Shop now for Lego sets and other gifts (affiliate link).
SomeoneSomewhere
1882 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1086

Lifetime subscriber

  #2461006 14-Apr-2020 12:42
Send private message

Actually, that's a fair point. I think there is a rectifier on the transformer output of a normal microwave.

 

 

 

Perhaps it's effectively an isolated DC boost converter then.


elpenguino
3576 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2938


  #2461080 14-Apr-2020 13:42
Send private message

SomeoneSomewhere:

 

My understanding is that to vary the power output of the magnetron, you need variable frequency AC. So the power flow is mains DC > rectifier > DC bus > inverter > variable frequency AC > transformer > magnetron.

 

Designing for an output frequency in the kHz allows the transformer to be much smaller 

 

 

(and lighter and cheaper). That's right. Aircraft use 400Hz power for the same reason.





Most of the posters in this thread are just like chimpanzees on MDMA, full of feelings of bonhomie, joy, and optimism. Fred99 8/4/21


sidefx
3775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1295

Trusted

  #2461082 14-Apr-2020 13:43
Send private message

SomeoneSomewhere:

 

My understanding is that to vary the power output of the magnetron, you need variable frequency AC. So the power flow is mains DC > rectifier > DC bus > inverter > variable frequency AC > transformer > magnetron.

 

 

 

 

that was sort of my understanding from that document, but more like:

 

mains AC > rectifier > DC > INVERTER > variable frequency AC > magnetron

 

So I was under the perhaps mistaken impression from that document that the transformer wasn't required with the inverter circuit design and that's how they get the higher efficiency (because transformers are pretty inefficient at the high frequencies required to generate microwaves?) 

 

 

 

(It truely must be Day 20 of lockdown :D )





"I was born not knowing and have had only a little time to change that here and there."         | Octopus Energy | Sharesies
              - Richard Feynman


elpenguino
3576 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2938


  #2461084 14-Apr-2020 13:45
Send private message

SomeoneSomewhere:

 

Actually, that's a fair point. I think there is a rectifier on the transformer output of a normal microwave.

 

 

Not that I recall, for powering the magnetron anyway. I have an old PSU in the garage and there's just a whopping transformer followed by a voltage doubler/tripler type unit as seen in the old CRT TVs.





Most of the posters in this thread are just like chimpanzees on MDMA, full of feelings of bonhomie, joy, and optimism. Fred99 8/4/21


 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.