Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


alasta

6890 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3364

Trusted
Subscriber

#302051 25-Oct-2022 12:27
Send private message

My iPhone and Watch are both roughly 14 months old. The iPhone is showing 99% battery health and the watch is showing 90% battery health. Admittedly the Watch probably averages slightly more charge cycles than the iPhone, but not significantly so. 

 

Is it normal for the Watch battery to degrade that much faster than the iPhone battery, or is this indicative of a battery defect? I am thinking it might be a good thing if the watch battery hits 80% health within the next ten months so that I can get it replaced under Applecare. 


Create new topic
Handsomedan
7770 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 7405

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #2987677 25-Oct-2022 12:31
Send private message

I have had Apple Watches for a few years and to be honest, the only one I really ever looked at re Battery Health was my S6, which I have just replaced with the Ultra. 

 

When I handed that down to my son, it was at 92% Battery Health and had been charged daily and used extensively. 

 

I'd say your Battery Health is sub-optimal. Just checked his S4, which also used to be mine and has not had a battery replacement - that's on 91%. 





Handsome Dan Has Spoken.
Handsome Dan needs to stop adding three dots to every sentence...

 

Handsome Dan does not currently have a side hustle as the mascot for Yale 

 

 

 

*Gladly accepting donations...




RunningMan
9186 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4840


  #2987808 25-Oct-2022 14:25
Send private message

I think it's more that the iPhone health is extremely good. Never seen 99% for a phone over a year old before.


alasta

6890 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3364

Trusted
Subscriber

  #2988098 25-Oct-2022 20:38
Send private message

Thanks guys. It sounds like the phone is performing better than expected and the watch is performing worse than expected. It makes me wonder if there are quite wide manufacturing tolerances on the batteries, or maybe the battery health measure just isn't particularly accurate. 




Handsomedan
7770 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 7405

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #2988157 26-Oct-2022 08:52
Send private message

alasta:

 

Thanks guys. It sounds like the phone is performing better than expected and the watch is performing worse than expected. It makes me wonder if there are quite wide manufacturing tolerances on the batteries, or maybe the battery health measure just isn't particularly accurate. 

 

 

Knowing what Apple are like for their QC, I'd say it's more likely to be the latter. I would say there's some algorithm doing an estimate based on a number of metrics and it's just not that precise. Maybe. 





Handsome Dan Has Spoken.
Handsome Dan needs to stop adding three dots to every sentence...

 

Handsome Dan does not currently have a side hustle as the mascot for Yale 

 

 

 

*Gladly accepting donations...


Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.