![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
linw: just wondering how overseas sites can feed faster traffic if I was on UFB 100/50 instead of 30/10? Aren't we totally dependent on the feeds from overseas?
linw: @Mercuito. I appreciate the points made in your last para but just wondering how overseas sites can feed faster traffic if I was on UFB 100/50 instead of 30/10? Aren't we totally dependent on the feeds from overseas?
I thought it would be more realistic to send files to the cloud with a 9Mbps upstream speed but a 200MB file sent to Skydrive still took 6m 50s (3.7Mbps). Maybe that's reasonable and to be expected. It still, surely, has to be much better than via a 0.6Mbps connection!
Cheers and sorry if I have hijacked your thread, tchart.
Adappted: Hi Guys, new to UFB today Orcon 30/10 in Dunedin CBD. The performance is downright shocking. Somewhat acceptable local but international is WAY slower than my ADSL. My ADSL to New York could hit 7.5 and Orcon fibre I can't break 2mbit to New York. UK is even more horrible I can't even break 700kbsec to the UK. I have a support ticket to Orcon now but this makes me extremely nervous as my biz needs a decent US connection. I am also tied to Orcon for an 18 month contract. If they can't sort this out maybe consumer guarantees act can get me out of the contract. I will give it some time, but so far shockingly disappointed and hoping there is a glitch somewhere. I had much much better performance on my ADSL. A mate 3 doors down got 100/50 plan and his isn't much better. Fingers crossed I get somewhere. I had expected at least 15mbit international which is half of the sales pitch they give you (not unreasonable imo). Here is my test I ran for Orcon, surely something is wrong??
Speedtest Results:-
Auckland,NZ: 6024 / 4040 (30ms)
Wellington, NZ: 6668 / 4316 (32ms)
Sydney, AU: 4147 / 5008 (56ms)
San Francisco, CA: 1098 / 1987 (207ms)
Maidenhead, UK: 680 / 1234 (334ms)
mercutio:Adappted: Hi Guys, new to UFB today Orcon 30/10 in Dunedin CBD. The performance is downright shocking. Somewhat acceptable local but international is WAY slower than my ADSL. My ADSL to New York could hit 7.5 and Orcon fibre I can't break 2mbit to New York. UK is even more horrible I can't even break 700kbsec to the UK. I have a support ticket to Orcon now but this makes me extremely nervous as my biz needs a decent US connection. I am also tied to Orcon for an 18 month contract. If they can't sort this out maybe consumer guarantees act can get me out of the contract. I will give it some time, but so far shockingly disappointed and hoping there is a glitch somewhere. I had much much better performance on my ADSL. A mate 3 doors down got 100/50 plan and his isn't much better. Fingers crossed I get somewhere. I had expected at least 15mbit international which is half of the sales pitch they give you (not unreasonable imo). Here is my test I ran for Orcon, surely something is wrong??
Speedtest Results:-
Auckland,NZ: 6024 / 4040 (30ms)
Wellington, NZ: 6668 / 4316 (32ms)
Sydney, AU: 4147 / 5008 (56ms)
San Francisco, CA: 1098 / 1987 (207ms)
Maidenhead, UK: 680 / 1234 (334ms)
New York really isn't the best place to test right now, hurricane and all. UK performance through some providers took a hit at the same time, as most routes go via New York, and Hurricane Electric at least had significant packet loss.
That said, the fact that you're even getting shocking performance nationally leads to believe that something is very wrong. I'd suggest logging a fault through official channels.
Orcon generally has pretty good international speeds, and I wouldn't think that 15 megabit international is unrealistic when things are working properly, at least off-peak.
Adappted:
Speedtest Results:-
Auckland,NZ: 6024 / 4040 (30ms)
Sounddude:Adappted:
Speedtest Results:-
Auckland,NZ: 6024 / 4040 (30ms)
This is the more worrying issue. You should get much better speeds.
Fix this issue and the international speeds should come right.
have you got a helpdesk ticket reference I can look at?
Please note all comments are from my own brain and don't necessarily represent the position or opinions of my employer, previous employers, colleagues, friends or pets.
Talkiet: Could you post some current NZ speedtest results please?
If they are in fact working as expected then perhaps (as already suggested) it's not the technology to blame, like the thread title implies.
Cheers - N
Just for comparison, and because I know where it's hosted - could you try
http://speedtest.telecom.co.nz/
as well please.
Zeon: Don't jump to conclusions and make a huge drama - unless you are a kiwi where it is your job to complain.... UFB is superior to DSL in almost every way as a technology. Sounds more like an issue in the backhaul/handover/Orcon sphere.
Early adopter teething issues for sure. If internet is so important for you then why did you get your copper cut off until you knew the fibre was working properly. Or even get it cut off at all in case the fibre goes out at some point?
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |