![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Nikoftime: Sovereign Palms is outside Christchurch in Kaiapoi, North Canterbury.
Enable are building most of the Fibre in Christchurch and Kaiapoi, however Sovereign palms subdivision was a BOF subdivision built with Chorus Fibre.
Incidently the Orcon address checker states that they can provide a fibre service in the part of Wigram skies subdivision which, I believe, was built the same way ...i.e fibre with Chorus and is definitely within Christchurch.
Thanks to Fireengine I'm expecting to hear back from Orcon/Chorus with a definite yes or no, pretty soon.
It is bizarre that this system is so complicated that neither Orcon or Chorus can give a quick decision one way or the other that they can guarantee is correct
steve98: Do you have to have a handover in CHCH to provide service? I'm guessing not if it works the same as EUBA?
Sounddude:steve98: Do you have to have a handover in CHCH to provide service? I'm guessing not if it works the same as EUBA?
Yes, each LFC area requires a handover.
Orcon has a Enable handover in Christchurch but not a Chorus handover.
steve98: It would be a tough decision for any RSP to invest in a Chorus NGA handover for Christchurch when it only buys them access to a handful of subdivisions.
Morgan French-Stagg
naggyman:steve98: It would be a tough decision for any RSP to invest in a Chorus NGA handover for Christchurch when it only buys them access to a handful of subdivisions.
That is why I think that Chorus should allow ISPs to "Tail" from a Chorus CFH Funded UFB Area handover to the Chorus subdivision fibre. This was previously done on copper, where Chorus would use their backhaul to "tunnel" the user's connection to another Chorus exchange where the user could then be handed over to the ISP's network. I think CFH rules doesn't let this happen in their areas, but I do not see why this couldn't happen with what is a technically private fibre install (no govt involvement). In some areas this has left users having either 1 ISP available or none due to the (expectedly) reluctant ISPs not wanting to waste money.
(CFH - Crown Fibre Holdings)
Another option (which is very unlikely) would be for Chorus to hand the fibre subdivisions not in their LFC boundaries to the area's LFC. For some reason I do not think this will happen ;)
*Insert big spe*dtest result here*
naggyman:steve98: It would be a tough decision for any RSP to invest in a Chorus NGA handover for Christchurch when it only buys them access to a handful of subdivisions.
That is why I think that Chorus should allow ISPs to "Tail" from a Chorus CFH Funded UFB Area handover to the Chorus subdivision fibre. This was previously done on copper, where Chorus would use their backhaul to "tunnel" the user's connection to another Chorus exchange where the user could then be handed over to the ISP's network. I think CFH rules doesn't let this happen in their areas, but I do not see why this couldn't happen with what is a technically private fibre install (no govt involvement). In some areas this has left users having either 1 ISP available or none due to the (expectedly) reluctant ISPs not wanting to waste money.
(CFH - Crown Fibre Holdings)
Another option (which is very unlikely) would be for Chorus to hand the fibre subdivisions not in their LFC boundaries to the area's LFC. For some reason I do not think this will happen ;)
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |