|
|
|
why do you need to test every 40 mins though?
Jase2985:
why do you need to test every 40 mins though?
Options are 10-49mins. It is either have it turned off, or set at 40mins due to OCD reasons.
Michael Murphy | https://murfy.nz
Referral Links: Quic Broadband (use R122101E7CV7Q for free setup) | Starlink
NZ Politics 2026 Tracking & Quiz: https://nzpol.nz
Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? Please consider supporting us by subscribing.
Opinions are my own and not the views of my employer.
Jase2985:
why do you need to test every 40 mins though?
There's a few legitimate reasons, but usually it's because they can automated it and then complain if the results aren't what they expect. Sort of a way to hold their provider to account. It's a bit silly.
Join Quic Broadband with my referral - no sign up fee and gives me account credit
Anything I say is the ramblings of an ill informed, opinionated so-and-so, and not representative of any of my past, present or future employers, and is also probably best disregarded.
michaelmurfy:Jase2985:why do you need to test every 40 mins though?
Options are 10-49mins. It is either have it turned off, or set at 40mins due to OCD reasons.
Rural IT and Broadband support.
Broadband troubleshooting and master filter installs.
Starlink installer - one month free: https://www.starlink.com/?referral=RC-32845-88860-71
Wi-Fi and networking
Cel-Fi supply and installer - boost your mobile phone coverage legally
Need help in Auckland, Waikato or BoP? Click my email button, or email me direct: [my user name] at geekzonemail dot com
One of the honest IPv4 speedtests I know is http://avm.de/nc/service/zack-der-speedtest-fuer-ihre-breitbandverbindung/
It's in German and from the manufacturer of the Fritzboxes but the resulting numbers are quite international :-)
michaelmurfy:
Jase2985:
why do you need to test every 40 mins though?
Options are 10-49mins. It is either have it turned off, or set at 40mins due to OCD reasons.
That's a pretty bad feature to have...
at a single user level, brilliant.
but when you look at say, a provider like 2d that i'd personally say is a tad slated towards running such gear that's killer.
Providers dont design their speedtest servers to be being hammered by hundreds of users all day long...
#include <std_disclaimer>
Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.
hio77:
Providers dont design their speedtest servers to be being hammered by hundreds of users all day long...
neither does the LFC's network or GPON :)
Jase2985:
hio77:
Providers dont design their speedtest servers to be being hammered by hundreds of users all day long...
neither does the LFC's network or GPON :)
fair point... few of these, with chorus's push for 'home plans' and your starting to hit limits.
In this case appears the server before the LFC though.
It's kinda a common statement that 2d's test servers are pretty solid test points, but alot of traffic comes from that viewpoint!
#include <std_disclaimer>
Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.
I commend you for going through the efforts there!
Quite interesting to see OSX suffers as bad as windows does lately too.
#include <std_disclaimer>
Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.
Firstclass: Hi All !
OK I have hooked up the FreeBSD server to a monitor, a USB keyboard and a mouse.
I do not have a GUI installed on the FreeBSD server for obvious reasons hence the LiveUSB approach.
Booted the FreeBSD server with the Fedora version 30 Live USB and plugged it into a Netgear ProSAFE Gigabit switch that I know can do 940Mb/sec (tested it with iPerf2/3/Netperf).
Just so happens that both computers use an Intel Pro/1000 network card.
Plugged in an iMac OS-X with the latest OS updates into the same switch, so I can test them side by side,
Fedora version 30 did
868Mb/sec down and 539 up.
OS-X did
689 down and 531 up.
Conclusion, NO issues with my cabling/fibre or 2D as an ISP.
Note how the Linux TCP/IP stack destroys OS-X on downloads, but uploads are even maybe due to the 400ish limit that 2D sets.
Pretty generous overhead on upstream I think.
Just a note to those who may not know this(regular readers or pros here do) that if you enable QOS it kills your throughput. I disabled QOS for the duration of the tests, but normally I leave it enabled to deal with bufferbloat.
https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/What_can_I_do_about_Bufferbloat/
Thanks for the tips on the LiveUSB/DVD approach and your guidance !
https://nick.mackechnie.co.nz | NZ ISP latency monitoring - https://smokeping.thenet.gen.nz
Firstclass: @NickMack
Thank you, yes it was, I downloaded your doco and looked at your post, much appreciated, great support !!!
https://nick.mackechnie.co.nz | NZ ISP latency monitoring - https://smokeping.thenet.gen.nz
I am in ChCh, using nperf.com on my mac with firefox
- chch server = 908/530 & 2ms
- akld server = 896/525 & 16ms
- dun server = 910/495 & 10ms
if you test with browser, nerf recommend firefox
|
|
|