![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
jbard: Hmm seems as though Snap is really trying to push people onto the unlimited plan, with reduced data for other plans and no pooling/shaping on the unlimited plan.
The main reason I loved snap was the consistent speed and no slow downs during peak times.
As unlimited customers aren't even in a separate pool to capped customers their is a chance I could lose that now.
In that sense I may as well be on the unlimited plan as any slow downs are going to affect all customers, not just unlimited plans.
#include <std_disclaimer>
Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.
hio77:jbard: Hmm seems as though Snap is really trying to push people onto the unlimited plan, with reduced data for other plans and no pooling/shaping on the unlimited plan.
The main reason I loved snap was the consistent speed and no slow downs during peak times.
As unlimited customers aren't even in a separate pool to capped customers their is a chance I could lose that now.
In that sense I may as well be on the unlimited plan as any slow downs are going to affect all customers, not just unlimited plans.
exactly my thinking, except snap seem to have made it pretty clear they arent looking to manage traffic, so ild hope that means they will simply give the bad eggs ruining the experience the slap!
RalphFromSnap: No changes are being made to existing customers or their plans unless they request it. ^MC
Thank you for clearing that up Ralph, I for one will NOT be requesting it :P
jbard:hio77:jbard: Hmm seems as though Snap is really trying to push people onto the unlimited plan, with reduced data for other plans and no pooling/shaping on the unlimited plan.
The main reason I loved snap was the consistent speed and no slow downs during peak times.
As unlimited customers aren't even in a separate pool to capped customers their is a chance I could lose that now.
In that sense I may as well be on the unlimited plan as any slow downs are going to affect all customers, not just unlimited plans.
exactly my thinking, except snap seem to have made it pretty clear they arent looking to manage traffic, so ild hope that means they will simply give the bad eggs ruining the experience the slap!
If that was the case then that would be fine, but they have also said they have no fair use policy so i'm not sure on what grounds they would be able to remove someone.
#include <std_disclaimer>
Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.
Old ADSL with POTS was $90 for 150GB, $100 for 300GB, $120 for 550 GB and $145 for 1050GB
hio77:jbard: Hmm seems as though Snap is really trying to push people onto the unlimited plan, with reduced data for other plans and no pooling/shaping on the unlimited plan.
The main reason I loved snap was the consistent speed and no slow downs during peak times.
As unlimited customers aren't even in a separate pool to capped customers their is a chance I could lose that now.
In that sense I may as well be on the unlimited plan as any slow downs are going to affect all customers, not just unlimited plans.
exactly my thinking, except snap seem to have made it pretty clear they arent looking to manage traffic, so ild hope that means they will simply give the bad eggs ruining the experience the slap!
eXDee: ADSL
- New POTS/VOIP - $75/50gb $89/150gb $99/Unlimited
- Old POTS/VOIP - $75/50gb ?? ?? ??
NonprayingMantis:hio77:jbard: Hmm seems as though Snap is really trying to push people onto the unlimited plan, with reduced data for other plans and no pooling/shaping on the unlimited plan.
The main reason I loved snap was the consistent speed and no slow downs during peak times.
As unlimited customers aren't even in a separate pool to capped customers their is a chance I could lose that now.
In that sense I may as well be on the unlimited plan as any slow downs are going to affect all customers, not just unlimited plans.
exactly my thinking, except snap seem to have made it pretty clear they arent looking to manage traffic, so ild hope that means they will simply give the bad eggs ruining the experience the slap!
they won't be able to. No fair use and no traffic management means they basically have no way of 'punishing' users who are causing issues for everyone else.
It's pretty weird that they say no traffic management at all. Surely all ISPs have some kind of traffic management in place to stop things like DOS attacks and the like.
Lorenceo: I'm undecided whether I should go on the unlimited plan or not. I hope performance isn't affected at all, capped or not.
#include <std_disclaimer>
Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.
cjmchch: Imagine the performance drop that everyone is going to get now. Who's going to be first up with the complaint that their performance has dropped because the unlimited is now all go...
Who has had a performance drop already? I'm on unlimited and downloading...
:)
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |