![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Stuve:richms: so what was behind that site out east auckland that the guy had no grounds to appeal going on a lamppost outside his house?
Do you read the articles?
It took them more than 6 months to get the concent. It is up to the individual councils to grant access. They had meeting after meeting about the tower. For example; in Wellington they have had meeting after meeting about a silly tower in the Hutt, it has taken over 12 months and I have given up wondering if it was ever built.
Stuve:
From what I can tell: MikeyPI - Has NO concept of reality. Sure, they can build their own, they are trying, but due to NZ's landscape/lack of population its hard to build a case to borrow 1B for a network. And they do have a great strategy, they are not trying to be loss leaders, actually I highly doubt they would loose any money from ANY customer. Whereas the $10 text plans are loss leaders. Most of the children who only spend $10 a month aren't worth it.
2D is new, anyway by October texting will be 1-3c and calling will be cheaper too.
Stuve:
they are not trying to be loss leaders, actually I highly doubt they would loose any money from ANY customer.
Stuve:
Most of the children who only spend $10 a month aren't worth it.
ajw:sbiddle:Stuve: http://telecom.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/114/related/1/kw/10%20txt%20cdma
Telecom's $10 text is about to end in 2 months, I am not sure about Boost. But on 31st march 2gedrees has a HUGE opportunity. Let's hope the ComCom get the regulation sorted out sooner than October.
There's nothing stopping 2degrees launching a $10 plan now.
Yes there is (1) Mobile termination rates. and roaming rates when 2D customers are roaming on Vfones network.
PaulBrislen: There is absolutely nothing in the MTR regime that stops a provider offering $10 TXT today. You may have noticed Telecom doing this for the past few years.
That's a bit like saying advertisers are paying too much to put ads in the newspaper therefore the subscription price has to go up. The two are not linked.
As for roaming rates, well that's just foolishness. If 2D couldn't roam onto VF's network they'd have a much smaller footprint in the country so they'd make LESS money. Trying to suggest that VF charges 2D too much for roaming is bizarre. There are other operators in town - they could roam to Telecom (for example). The market is a competitive one and they've got a deal they're happy to launch with.
Or are you just looking for yet more regulatory intervention for the sake of it?
Cheers
Paul
PaulBrislen: There is absolutely nothing in the MTR regime that stops a provider offering $10 TXT today. You may have noticed Telecom doing this for the past few years.
That's a bit like saying advertisers are paying too much to put ads in the newspaper therefore the subscription price has to go up. The two are not linked.
As for roaming rates, well that's just foolishness. If 2D couldn't roam onto VF's network they'd have a much smaller footprint in the country so they'd make LESS money. Trying to suggest that VF charges 2D too much for roaming is bizarre. There are other operators in town - they could roam to Telecom (for example). The market is a competitive one and they've got a deal they're happy to launch with.
Or are you just looking for yet more regulatory intervention for the sake of it?
Cheers
Paul
PaulBrislen: For the same reason we don't give away free puppies with every phone sold or offer unlimited air travel to home users...
we have a different marketing approach.
That's it. Nothing to do with MTRs... it's all about marketing.
ajw:PaulBrislen: There is absolutely nothing in the MTR regime that stops a provider offering $10 TXT today. You may have noticed Telecom doing this for the past few years.
That's a bit like saying advertisers are paying too much to put ads in the newspaper therefore the subscription price has to go up. The two are not linked.
As for roaming rates, well that's just foolishness. If 2D couldn't roam onto VF's network they'd have a much smaller footprint in the country so they'd make LESS money. Trying to suggest that VF charges 2D too much for roaming is bizarre. There are other operators in town - they could roam to Telecom (for example). The market is a competitive one and they've got a deal they're happy to launch with.
Or are you just looking for yet more regulatory intervention for the sake of it?
Cheers
Paul
Paul, why then don't Vfone offer it. It seems most of the Vfone text plans are on net. If their was money to be made vfone would have introduced a $10TXT years ago.
yuxek: ok so why isn't vodafone offering $10 text then? Telecom do and you don't. I think lots of young kids would switch to vodafone if you did.
PaulBrislen: Well now I'm really confused, AJW.
Either there's a "huge opportunity" as the grandparent post suggests, or there's no opportunity and such plans are unable to make money as you suggest...
Telecom clearly thinks it can make money at it - it offers $10TXT to its CDMA customers and the equivalent $12 TXT to XT customers.
Vodafone has chosen not to offer such a plan and as I said it's got nothing to do with MTR and all to do with which market we chose to go after.
Cheers
Paul
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |