Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


spacedog

496 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 62


#105576 7-Jul-2012 10:50
Send private message

How does the authentication work on VDSL2 for SNAP? Is it a PPPOE type connection? Or a PPPOA?  Or something entirely different?

I ask because I have a device that does not play nicely with the smaller frame size of PPPOE and I'm wondering what I'm in for if I switch over to VDSL2 with Snap?

Create new topic
sbiddle
30853 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9996

Retired Mod
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  #652219 7-Jul-2012 12:11
Send private message

No ISP uses PPPoA for VDSL2. For EUBA ISP's have the option of maintaining PPPoA for legacy fallback (and it's converted from PPPoA by the ISAM) or using any other method they choose - static IP's, DHCP or PPPoE.




spacedog

496 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 62


  #652222 7-Jul-2012 12:29
Send private message

OK....so what is snap using?  I have problems with my device when the MTU is down at 1492

vexxxboy
4336 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2072


  #652223 7-Jul-2012 12:31
Send private message


This is what Snap will tell you to use

PPPoE
VPI: 0
VCI: 110
Uses VLAN10




Common sense is not as common as you think.




spacedog

496 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 62


  #652225 7-Jul-2012 12:37
Send private message

Damn....

PPPOE will break my VPN and boxee box functionality

:sadface:

deadlyllama
1283 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 476

Trusted

  #652228 7-Jul-2012 12:42
Send private message

spacedog: Damn....

PPPOE will break my VPN and boxee box functionality

:sadface:


It doesn't have to -- just drop the MTU on your VPN a bit (by 8 bytes?).  TCP PMTU discovery should fix everything for you.

spacedog

496 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 62


  #652230 7-Jul-2012 12:47
Send private message

deadlyllama:
spacedog: Damn....

PPPOE will break my VPN and boxee box functionality

:sadface:


It doesn't have to -- just drop the MTU on your VPN a bit (by 8 bytes?).  TCP PMTU discovery should fix everything for you.


Sadly, the boxee box is locked down so you can't control the MTU on it's built-in VPN client...Lame...yes, but I've been waiting for them to fix it for 6 months now...so I have to work around that.  

 
 
 

Support Geekzone with one-off or recurring donations Donate via PressPatron.
sbiddle
30853 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9996

Retired Mod
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  #652233 7-Jul-2012 12:55
Send private message

EUBA supports 1500 byte MTU's, but since most ISP's use PPPoE for simplicity you're stuck with 1492 on PPPoE. If you had a static or dynamic IP you could have 1500.



 


mercutio
1392 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 134


  #652475 8-Jul-2012 11:32
Send private message

sbiddle: EUBA supports 1500 byte MTU's, but since most ISP's use PPPoE for simplicity you're stuck with 1492 on PPPoE. If you had a static or dynamic IP you could have 1500.


Isn't http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4638 meant to fix that?

I happened to have problems with 1492 byte mtus, mostly with something using UDP,  I found  TP-Link 8960 modem could not set a 1500 byte MTU on pppoa connections unless you telnetted in, and set it with ifconfig and deleted the mss clamping rules.  Ended up emailing them.  They did fix it in the end.

http://www.tp-link.com/en/support/download/?model=TD-W8960N&version=V3#tbl_j



spacedog

496 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 62


  #652572 8-Jul-2012 17:58
Send private message

mercutio:
sbiddle: EUBA supports 1500 byte MTU's, but since most ISP's use PPPoE for simplicity you're stuck with 1492 on PPPoE. If you had a static or dynamic IP you could have 1500.


Isn't http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4638 meant to fix that?

I happened to have problems with 1492 byte mtus, mostly with something using UDP,  I found  TP-Link 8960 modem could not set a 1500 byte MTU on pppoa connections unless you telnetted in, and set it with ifconfig and deleted the mss clamping rules.  Ended up emailing them.  They did fix it in the end.

http://www.tp-link.com/en/support/download/?model=TD-W8960N&version=V3#tbl_j




You said PPPOA and the tp-link firmware fixes it for PPPOA.

The issue I'm discussing is with PPPOE which is pretty much capped at 1492.  The IETF article you reference is all well and good for theory, but it is not always put in practice.

The specific issue I have is that my stoopid boxee box has a built-in VPN client and that client *ALWAYS* negotiates at 1500.  However, when I'm connected via PPPOE the 1492 MTU causes fragmentation with the VPNs 1500 MTU and eventually the connection falls over.  When I'm connected on a PPPOA connection, it manages to work OK.  It's definitely a stupid bug in my device, but it's a bug that I have to workaround unfortunately.  Not anyone's fault except the people at boxee, tbqh.

mercutio
1392 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 134


  #652577 8-Jul-2012 18:14
Send private message

spacedog:
mercutio:
sbiddle: EUBA supports 1500 byte MTU's, but since most ISP's use PPPoE for simplicity you're stuck with 1492 on PPPoE. If you had a static or dynamic IP you could have 1500.


Isn't http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4638 meant to fix that?

I happened to have problems with 1492 byte mtus, mostly with something using UDP,  I found  TP-Link 8960 modem could not set a 1500 byte MTU on pppoa connections unless you telnetted in, and set it with ifconfig and deleted the mss clamping rules.  Ended up emailing them.  They did fix it in the end.

http://www.tp-link.com/en/support/download/?model=TD-W8960N&version=V3#tbl_j




You said PPPOA and the tp-link firmware fixes it for PPPOA.

The issue I'm discussing is with PPPOE which is pretty much capped at 1492.  The IETF article you reference is all well and good for theory, but it is not always put in practice.


Yeh, doing a bit of research some clients have only recently implemented that feature, but you have flexibility with clients.  I'm not sure if the server supports it...


The specific issue I have is that my stoopid boxee box has a built-in VPN client and that client *ALWAYS* negotiates at 1500.  However, when I'm connected via PPPOE the 1492 MTU causes fragmentation with the VPNs 1500 MTU and eventually the connection falls over.  When I'm connected on a PPPOA connection, it manages to work OK.  It's definitely a stupid bug in my device, but it's a bug that I have to workaround unfortunately.  Not anyone's fault except the people at boxee, tbqh.


From a quick Google search it looks like the remote VPN should be able to negotiate a lower mtu.



PenultimateHop
637 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 2

Trusted

  #652596 8-Jul-2012 19:00
Send private message

sbiddle: EUBA supports 1500 byte MTU's, but since most ISP's use PPPoE for simplicity you're stuck with 1492 on PPPoE. If you had a static or dynamic IP you could have 1500.

EUBA supports 1500 byte PPPoE MTUs, and the ISAM will even negotiate RFC4638 support when operating as an oA to oE interworking function.

Many poorly designed CPEs do not support it; or your ISP's BRAS is misconfigured.

Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.