Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


openmedia

3449 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 877

Trusted

#28772 11-Dec-2008 11:54
Send private message

Got an awful lot of false positives from Orcon's spam filters and I'd like to try and tune the settings.

Does anyone know of a way to mark messages so that Orcon's DSPAM setup with learn?




Generally known online as OpenMedia, now working for Red Hat APAC as a Technology Evangelist and Portfolio Architect. Still playing with MythTV and digital media on the side.


Create new topic
old3eyes
9158 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1364

Subscriber

  #183489 11-Dec-2008 12:27
Send private message

Login to your account 

Go to My Services > Email >Spamblocking.  I believe that you can change setting in there..





Regards,

Old3eyes




Jarno
270 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 50


  #183513 11-Dec-2008 13:55
Send private message

I've got my threshold set at 13, and it's still somewhat overeager to mark emails as spam. I've found it does that periodically. My theory is that the learning filter is reset every once in a while when it starts becoming ineffective, so it needs a bit of time to retune itself to what is and isn't spam.

---JvdL---

openmedia

3449 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 877

Trusted

  #183545 11-Dec-2008 15:23
Send private message

old3eyes:

Login to your account 

Go to My Services > Email >Spamblocking.  I believe that you can change setting in there..



That sets the level at which mails are marked as spam. I've played with that and I can't get a good balance.

To avoid false positives I have to turn the spam filter off altogether. With the highest setting I still get a lot of spam that DSPAM doesn't catch.

I'd like to provide some data to help it learn and improve which doesn't appear to be an option.




Generally known online as OpenMedia, now working for Red Hat APAC as a Technology Evangelist and Portfolio Architect. Still playing with MythTV and digital media on the side.




kerrin
165 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 4


  #183706 12-Dec-2008 10:36
Send private message

Spammers are getting too cunning these days putting in random text to fool the filters.   

openmedia

3449 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 877

Trusted

  #183730 12-Dec-2008 13:19
Send private message

What i'm more worried about is the sheer amount of false positives I get as soon as I enable their spam filters.




Generally known online as OpenMedia, now working for Red Hat APAC as a Technology Evangelist and Portfolio Architect. Still playing with MythTV and digital media on the side.


PhoneMonkey
49 posts

Geek


  #184002 14-Dec-2008 12:17
Send private message

hay,


With the spam threshold 0=best. the higher the less sessitive the filtering.

Spam is part of the internet, why not just use gmail or another free 3rd party address that has world class spam blocking if you are not happy with what your ISP serves you.


Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.