Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


art3011

39 posts

Geek


#64333 13-Jul-2010 14:43
Send private message

Some sites are not resolved when using orcon dns, but works with google or opendns:

dig site_name (excerpt)


;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 557
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0


Using google dns 8.8.8.8.

dig @8.8.8.8 site_name (excerpt)

;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 7773
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

I ger SERVFAIL using orcon but with 8.8.8.8, I get NOERROR.

Is there something wrong with orcon dns ? Is orcon DNS reliable ?

I was hoping not to use google or opendns because local dns should be faster.

Create new topic
magu
Professional yak shaver
1599 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 7

Trusted
BitSignal
Lifetime subscriber

  #350729 13-Jul-2010 14:58
Send private message

ISP DNS is almost never reliable. YMMV.




"Roads? Where we're going, we don't need roads." - Doc Emmet Brown



BlakJak
1330 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 735

Trusted

  #350796 13-Jul-2010 15:22
Send private message

magu: ISP DNS is almost never reliable. YMMV.


That's a terrible generalisation to make. ISP DNS is almost always the fastest as it's almost always the closest to you in network terms. Latency between you and your caching resolver can make a huge difference to your network performance.

FWIW i've seen similar issues with a domain I (personally) host and spoke to someone at Orcon about it within the last half hour. It's being looked into.




No signature to see here, move along...

LennonNZ
2459 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 411

ID Verified
Trusted

  #350806 13-Jul-2010 15:29
Send private message

What are the domains are causing you the issue?

Thanks



magu
Professional yak shaver
1599 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 7

Trusted
BitSignal
Lifetime subscriber

  #350829 13-Jul-2010 15:41
Send private message

BlakJak:
magu: ISP DNS is almost never reliable. YMMV.


That's a terrible generalisation to make. ISP DNS is almost always the fastest as it's almost always the closest to you in network terms. Latency between you and your caching resolver can make a huge difference to your network performance.

FWIW i've seen similar issues with a domain I (personally) host and spoke to someone at Orcon about it within the last half hour. It's being looked into.


Terrible, yes. But unfortunately it's the most common cause of problems for end users.

Of course, Orcon is a reputable ISP and is sure to have a good DNS admin.




"Roads? Where we're going, we don't need roads." - Doc Emmet Brown

freitasm
BDFL - Memuneh
80653 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41045

Administrator
ID Verified
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  #350860 13-Jul-2010 16:06
Send private message

The problem of using third party DNS is when the content providers use a CDN and the third party DNS doesn't tell you the correct IP addresses because they don't take geographical distribution in consideration - not even local caches.





Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies 

 

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

 


magu
Professional yak shaver
1599 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 7

Trusted
BitSignal
Lifetime subscriber

  #350880 13-Jul-2010 16:22
Send private message

freitasm: The problem of using third party DNS is when the content providers use a CDN and the third party DNS doesn't tell you the correct IP addresses because they don't take geographical distribution in consideration - not even local caches.



With that I agree. 




"Roads? Where we're going, we don't need roads." - Doc Emmet Brown

 
 
 

Shop on-line at New World now for your groceries (affiliate link).
art3011

39 posts

Geek


  #351004 13-Jul-2010 18:38
Send private message

Rang Orcon. They said they will investigate, and I should try to get in touch with them in the next couple of days. In the meantime, I'm using OpenDNS. Problem solved with the workaround.

BlakJak
1330 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 735

Trusted

  #351050 13-Jul-2010 19:47
Send private message

In my case it appears that a technicality around strict interpretation of an RFC is the culprit - this 'feature' came with bind 9.6x.  I assume Orcon updated not too long ago.

Worked around as well. Now hunting for info as to why behavior has only just changed...




No signature to see here, move along...

art3011

39 posts

Geek


  #351328 14-Jul-2010 11:45
Send private message

This morning, the the site can again be resolved by ORCON DNS, so I reconfigured again to use ORCON.

From my experience, OpenDNS is very reliable, but ISP DNS is faster.

So now, ORCON DNS or OpenDNS ? faster or reliable ? That is the question.

Any disadvantages if I do not use ORCON DNS ?

freitasm
BDFL - Memuneh
80653 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41045

Administrator
ID Verified
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  #351336 14-Jul-2010 11:57
Send private message

art3011: Any disadvantages if I do not use ORCON DNS ?


Read my previous reply. It might be a problem if you use large sites such as Facebook or others using CDNs.




Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies 

 

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

 


BlakJak
1330 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 735

Trusted

  #351345 14-Jul-2010 12:20
Send private message

art3011: This morning, the the site can again be resolved by ORCON DNS, so I reconfigured again to use ORCON.

From my experience, OpenDNS is very reliable, but ISP DNS is faster.

So now, ORCON DNS or OpenDNS ? faster or reliable ? That is the question.

Any disadvantages if I do not use ORCON DNS ?


What site?

Orcon did indeed upgrade their DNS servers a few weeks ago which jibes with when the site I was involved with started having problems.




No signature to see here, move along...

 
 
 

Want to support Geekzone and browse the site without the ads? Subscribe to Geekzone now (monthly, annual and lifetime options).
Athlonite
1828 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 210
Inactive user


  #351960 15-Jul-2010 16:07
Send private message

I Have no probs with facebook and I'm using OpenDNS nor any other site that I haven't chosen to have OpenDNS block automatically

freitasm
BDFL - Memuneh
80653 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41045

Administrator
ID Verified
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  #351962 15-Jul-2010 16:08
Send private message

It depends... If you ISP has an Akamai cache for example, the DNS response will point the wrong IP address and you might have problems with responses timeout.




Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies 

 

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

 


LennonNZ
2459 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 411

ID Verified
Trusted

  #351975 15-Jul-2010 16:31
Send private message

Yes.. microsoft,yahoo,youtube,google,facebook+many other websites are all CDNed in various ways and using other than the ISP's DNS Servers may cause issues/slowness on these and many other websites.

Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.