Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
bfginger
1330 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 191


  #380991 17-Sep-2010 05:07
Send private message

JonC: Earlier than expected - maybe the revenue from spectrum auctions beckoned.

I wonder if they'll be handing out vouchers for STBs like the US.



DVB-T STBs in NZ are far more expensive than equivalent units being sold elsewhere. Blame the combination of the small market, MHEG-5 and Freeview certification. The price point they're at now is too high to encourage people to buy them for their CRTs and the "Freeview|HD" brand makes people think non HD televisions can't be paired with a Freeview|HD STB. Alot of CRTs are going to be sent to the landfill for no good reason. Hopefully the price of a Freeview STB will be below $100 by 2012 but I don't think it's likely.



sbiddle
30853 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9996

Retired Mod
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  #380994 17-Sep-2010 06:16
Send private message

xarqi:
sbiddle:
xarqi: I'm very sceptical about the "Freeview HD for everyone" claim. Very.



Who claimed this? Freeview have certainly never claimed that everybody will get Freeview|HD.



ScreenScribe, in the article cited.

Well, technically what they wrote was "Free HDTV Everywhere by 2013?" 


Ahh.. But while the headline said that they did then go on to explain the 87% rollout of Freeview|HD.

Definately a poor choice of headline.


sbiddle
30853 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9996

Retired Mod
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  #380995 17-Sep-2010 06:17
Send private message

bfginger:
JonC: Earlier than expected - maybe the revenue from spectrum auctions beckoned.

I wonder if they'll be handing out vouchers for STBs like the US.



DVB-T STBs in NZ are far more expensive than equivalent units being sold elsewhere. Blame the combination of the small market, MHEG-5 and Freeview certification.


I disagree. I believe the pricing is still mainly because of the H.264 issue. The reality is STB's are not as cheap to make as MPEG2 based ones and we're still seeing a premium price for them.




scuwp
3927 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2510


  #381006 17-Sep-2010 07:47
Send private message

I read in the Herald this morning that already digital TV uptake is at 70%.  Anyone here actually know how they arrive at that figure or even measure it.  Or is it just a S.W.A.G (scientific wild-ass guess) as I suspect? 




Lazy is such an ugly word, I prefer to call it selective participation



cyril7
9075 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2499

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #381008 17-Sep-2010 07:52
Send private message

I read in the Herald this morning that already digital TV uptake is at 70%. Anyone here actually know how they arrive at that figure or even measure it. Or is it just a S.W.A.G (scientific wild-ass guess) as I suspect?


They do phone surveys (I know of several folk rung) and use the sales figures on certified boxs but not uncertified satellite boxs. Its not that hard when you realise that roughly 50% of that figure comes from a well known figure of Sky subs.

Cyril

bfginger
1330 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 191


  #381394 17-Sep-2010 18:54
Send private message



I disagree. I believe the pricing is still mainly because of the H.264 issue. The reality is STB's are not as cheap to make as MPEG2 based ones and we're still seeing a premium price for them.



A Freeview certified H.264 MPEG-4 HD STB in Australia costs just AU$69. The same unit was AU$99 20 months ago. 

 
 
 
 

Shop now for Dyson appliances (affiliate link).
old3eyes
9158 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1364

Subscriber

  #381407 17-Sep-2010 19:36
Send private message

bfginger:


I disagree. I believe the pricing is still mainly because of the H.264 issue. The reality is STB's are not as cheap to make as MPEG2 based ones and we're still seeing a premium price for them.




A Freeview certified H.264 MPEG-4 HD STB in Australia costs just AU$69. The same unit was AU$99 20 months ago. 


Wonder how these differer from the NZ version.




Regards,

Old3eyes


sbiddle
30853 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9996

Retired Mod
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  #381427 17-Sep-2010 20:15
Send private message

bfginger:


I disagree. I believe the pricing is still mainly because of the H.264 issue. The reality is STB's are not as cheap to make as MPEG2 based ones and we're still seeing a premium price for them.



A Freeview certified H.264 MPEG-4 HD STB in Australia costs just AU$69. The same unit was AU$99 20 months ago. 


Mind providing a link to that? There were certainly no H.264 STB's in Aussie 20 months ago and the $69 pricepoint for a H.264 one now is certainly not something I've seen. MPEG2 - yes, but certainly not H.264.


mm1352000
1149 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 95
Inactive user


  #381472 17-Sep-2010 22:52
Send private message

Yeah, I think that might have been 1080i HD, but MPEG 2 not h.264...

bfginger
1330 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 191


  #381474 17-Sep-2010 23:13
Send private message
ObidiahSlope
260 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 66


  #381487 18-Sep-2010 00:02
Send private message

Stop thia hating on Freeview DVB satellite.

I indtalled a Freeview satellite dish at my parents place in a small South Island village with 200 inhabitants. The dish is so much better than what they had before, a community owned translator on the ridge behind the village offering Tv One TV2 and TV3 if atmospheric conditions were favourable.

The focus for the dish was just to the right of a very high peak. I hope the mountain never moves or the recption will be lousy.

Mum enjoys watching question time on the Parliamentary chanel and Dad enjoys the 8:00PM news without commercials on chanel 7




Obsequious hypocrite

 
 
 

Support Geekzone with one-off or recurring donations Donate via PressPatron.
xarqi
727 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 7


  #381491 18-Sep-2010 00:09
Send private message

ObidiahSlope: Stop thia hating on Freeview DVB sattelite.


I don't think anyone is saying that Freeview SD via satellite is not a great deal better than VHF, or analogue UHF.
What I personally bemoan is that the only HD satellite FTA transmission  available in NZ for the foreseeable future is the SBS signal we are able to pick up.

Paradoxically, it is the very congestion that prevents Freeview HD via satellite that gives us this opportunity. 

richms
29098 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10209

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #381492 18-Sep-2010 00:14
Send private message

xarqi:
ObidiahSlope: Stop thia hating on Freeview DVB sattelite.


I don't think anyone is saying that Freeview SD via satellite is not a great deal better than VHF, or analogue UHF.
What I personally bemoan is that the only HD satellite FTA transmission  available in NZ for the foreseeable future is the SBS signal we are able to pick up.

Paradoxically, it is the very congestion that prevents Freeview HD via satellite that gives us this opportunity. 


I have said many times that it is inferior to analog VHF, other than aspect ratio being better on dvb-s, the analog image is better in that it has no blocking etc on movement or just because a static scene has been onscreen for a length of time.




Richard rich.ms

xarqi
727 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 7


  #381495 18-Sep-2010 00:18
Send private message

richms:
xarqi:
ObidiahSlope: Stop thia hating on Freeview DVB sattelite.


I don't think anyone is saying that Freeview SD via satellite is not a great deal better than VHF, or analogue UHF.
What I personally bemoan is that the only HD satellite FTA transmission  available in NZ for the foreseeable future is the SBS signal we are able to pick up.

Paradoxically, it is the very congestion that prevents Freeview HD via satellite that gives us this opportunity. 


I have said many times that it is inferior to analog VHF, other than aspect ratio being better on dvb-s, the analog image is better in that it has no blocking etc on movement or just because a static scene has been onscreen for a length of time.

My apologies.
Such subtleties are lost on me, swamped as they are by ghosting from multiple reflections from hills and buildings, passing aircraft, general noise, and no UHF signal at all. 

mm1352000
1149 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 95
Inactive user


  #381501 18-Sep-2010 00:47
Send private message

bfginger: www.kogan.com.au/shop/freeview-hd-digital-set-top-box/

That's about NZ$90.

I guess I was wrong - that's not a bad deal really...

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.