Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




24 posts

Geek


Topic # 83350 14-May-2011 17:59
Send private message

Hi, just confirming I'm in need of a masthead amplifier. Currently have a gizmo aerial with the UHF gain kit. Can get dvb-t freeview fine with no splitter. 2-way splitter is %95 fine with the odd pixelation in one of the rooms (probably due to a longer cable run). Wanting to split more (6way) and have no signal after that.

I need an amplifier right? if so, 25db enough? or go for the next one up. Was looking at getting one of these. Any recommendations on better amplifiers?

Thanks

View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
481 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 5


  Reply # 469123 14-May-2011 18:21
Send private message

kingzzz69: Can get dvb-t freeview fine with no splitter. 2-way splitter is %95 fine with the odd pixelation in one of the rooms (probably due to a longer cable run). Wanting to split more (6way) and have no signal after that.

It certainly sounds like a good quality amplifier would help, however ...

kingzzz69: Currently have a gizmo aerial with the UHF gain kit.

I'm not familiar with the Gizmo aerial, but "with the UHF gain kit" makes me wonder if you could get a higher gain UHF aerial to start off. Its always a good idea to get the best signal possible from your aerial first, and then amplify that if necessary.

Again I'm not familiar with Johansson amplifiers. I use a Kingray which I'm very happy with, and Kingray amplifiers do have a good reputation.

EDIT TO ADD:
The approximate loss when splitting a signal is 2 way = 4db, 4 way = 8dB, 6 way = 10dB, 8 way = 12dB.
Of course longer cable runs introduce some further losses, but not nearly as significant, so the splitter loss should help determine what power amplifier is required.

There is some useful information on splitters, amplifiers and aerials on this website.

553 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 15

Subscriber

  Reply # 469125 14-May-2011 18:23
Send private message

I'd recommend this

 
 
 
 




24 posts

Geek


  Reply # 469127 14-May-2011 18:44
Send private message

Deev8: I'm not familiar with the Gizmo aerial, but "with the UHF gain kit" makes me wonder if you could get a higher gain UHF aerial to start off. Its always a good idea to get the best signal possible from your aerial first, and then amplify that if necessary


Thanks for the info, Yea the aerial is not the best, I think maybe 10db gain total (UHF) with the gain kit. We have other analog tvs in the house so still need normal VHF signals too.





24 posts

Geek


  Reply # 469128 14-May-2011 18:49
Send private message

Hmm another option, could get a UHF aerial only and attach it to the same pole and use one of those 2 into 1 combiner things.

1901 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 120

Trusted

  Reply # 469187 15-May-2011 00:56
Send private message

Your splitter might specify its insertion loss, but I imagine between 9dB-11dB. Add to that the attenuation of your longest coax cable and any other devices you have in the system, and thats how much power you need to boost the signal by (since your aerial seems to pick up enough signal for 1 TV). I guess 20dB to 24dB like this might be plenty, unless you have really long distances.




Qualified in business, certified in fibre, stuck in copper, have to keep going  ^_^

481 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 5


  Reply # 469300 15-May-2011 14:56
Send private message

At UHF TV frequencies cable losses for decent quality RG6 cable should be a little less than 2dB per 10m. Add in 10dB for your 6-way splitter, and some additional loss for all the connectors between aerial and TV, and a 24dB amp should be plenty powerful enough.

Do yourself a favour and use F Connectors for everything but the actual connection to the TVs, and do look into getting a better aerial to improve your signal to noise ratio.

280 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 3


  Reply # 469718 16-May-2011 15:51
Send private message

Do the signal strength and quality numbers give any indication of your ability to split.  I'm about to split mine.  I've got a signal feed going to my Sony TV that shows strength as 100 and Quality as 56 and I'm hoping to eventually split it 4 ways. 



20193 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3787

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 469725 16-May-2011 15:59
Send private message

Masthead amplifiers are not made for driving many TVs, they have a lower total power output than you need to split many ways, they are made to bring a low level signal up to be able to drive down a cable, and are generally used only when you have exhaused all the options for putting a decent antenna in.

The gizmo is about as far from a decent antenna as you can get without resorting to a coathanger.

You want a distribution amplifier that you put inside and can output over 110dB - most mastheads struggle to get near that without massive distortion which will kill the digital signals and make diagonal lines appear over the analog stuff.

IMO, sort your antenna out with the biggest that you can fit, then see if you need an amp. They generally only make things worse unless you can get it filtered etc. I had to get an overpriced diplexer here to stop all the RT stuff getting in via the antenna and causing digitals to pixleate and the analogs to get swirly patterns over them. Single TV and no amp was fine.

Also if the cables are genuinly long, you may want to get an amp with gain compensation in it. There are external things that do it as well but they only attenuate. One of those and a second amp sorted out the problems with all the upper UHF;s looking like crap in the garage which is on the end of about 25m of cheap nasty coax.




Richard rich.ms

565 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 24

Trusted

  Reply # 469783 16-May-2011 17:43
Send private message

richms: Masthead amplifiers are not made for driving many TVs, they have a lower total power output than you need to split many ways, they are made to bring a low level signal up to be able to drive down a cable, and are generally used only when you have exhaused all the options for putting a decent antenna in.

The gizmo is about as far from a decent antenna as you can get without resorting to a coathanger.

You want a distribution amplifier that you put inside and can output over 110dB - most mastheads struggle to get near that without massive distortion which will kill the digital signals and make diagonal lines appear over the analog stuff.

IMO, sort your antenna out with the biggest that you can fit, then see if you need an amp. They generally only make things worse unless you can get it filtered etc. I had to get an overpriced diplexer here to stop all the RT stuff getting in via the antenna and causing digitals to pixleate and the analogs to get swirly patterns over them. Single TV and no amp was fine.

Also if the cables are genuinly long, you may want to get an amp with gain compensation in it. There are external things that do it as well but they only attenuate. One of those and a second amp sorted out the problems with all the upper UHF;s looking like crap in the garage which is on the end of about 25m of cheap nasty coax.


+1
But also, if you dont know the S&Q readings
you are"*rinating in the breeze"



24 posts

Geek


  Reply # 469933 17-May-2011 04:23
Send private message
20193 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3787

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 470107 17-May-2011 14:10
Send private message

Yeah, to be honest any money you are spending on combining the antenna would be better off put towards a digital box tho, since its so much better and switchoff is getting close.




Richard rich.ms

481 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 5


  Reply # 470172 17-May-2011 17:00
Send private message

richms: You want a distribution amplifier that you put inside and can output over 110dB - most mastheads struggle to get near that without massive distortion which will kill the digital signals and make diagonal lines appear over the analog stuff.

I really think that 110dB amplification would be over the top for someone who is happy they have an adequate signal when their aerial is connected directly to a TV, but now wants to split that signal 6 ways!

20193 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3787

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 470175 17-May-2011 17:08
Send private message

Not amplification, the max output level. That is really low on the cheap amps and then they overload and end up with crap allover the top of other crap, so when you autotune you get about 6 versions of each channel on various places and them all ontop of eachother etc..




Richard rich.ms

1901 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 120

Trusted

  Reply # 470285 17-May-2011 21:47
Send private message

richms: Not amplification, the max output level. That is really low on the cheap amps and then they overload and end up with crap allover the top of other crap, so when you autotune you get about 6 versions of each channel on various places and them all ontop of eachother etc..


So output power is measured in dBm, whereas the relative loss/gain of each component is dB, but awkward to measure signal strength at the amplifier without tools anyway. We know one link is ok without a splitter, so the amp must compensate for 10dB loss of inserting the splitter plus any longer cables. End result should be the same if you get that good aerial.




Qualified in business, certified in fibre, stuck in copper, have to keep going  ^_^

20193 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3787

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 470288 17-May-2011 21:50
Send private message

I always get the dBm and dBuV mixed up, too many measurements.




Richard rich.ms

 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Intel unveils the 8th Gen Intel Core Processor family for desktop
Posted 25-Sep-2017 19:45


Chow brothers plan to invest NZ$100 million in technology
Posted 24-Sep-2017 16:24


Symantec protects data everywhere with Information Centric Security
Posted 21-Sep-2017 15:33


FUJIFILM introduces X-E3 mirrorless camera with wireless connectivity
Posted 18-Sep-2017 13:53


Vodafone announces new plans with bigger data bundles
Posted 15-Sep-2017 10:51


Skinny launches phone with support for te reo Maori
Posted 14-Sep-2017 08:39


If Vodafone dropping mail worries you, you’re doing online wrong
Posted 11-Sep-2017 13:54


Vodafone New Zealand deploy live 400 gigabit system
Posted 11-Sep-2017 11:07


OPPO camera phones now available at PB Tech
Posted 11-Sep-2017 09:56


Norton Wi-Fi Privacy — Easy, flawed VPN
Posted 11-Sep-2017 09:48


Lenovo reveals new ThinkPad A Series
Posted 8-Sep-2017 14:37


Huawei passes Apple for the first time to capture the second spot globally
Posted 8-Sep-2017 10:45


Vodafone initiative enhances te reo Maori pronunciation on Google Maps
Posted 8-Sep-2017 10:40


Voyager Internet expand local internet phone services company with Conversant acquisition
Posted 6-Sep-2017 18:27


NOW Expands in to Tauranga
Posted 5-Sep-2017 18:16



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.