Network Teaming options...

Forums › IT Pro and developers › Network Teaming options...

freitasm

BDFL - Memuneh
80646 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41030

Administrator

ID Verified

Trusted

Geekzone

Lifetime subscriber

#112427 8-Dec-2012 11:19

We currently have an HP DL server with two NICs. Because on Windows Server 2008 Network teaming requires OEM software (which we have but not configured for it) we just have two IPs on physical and two virtual network adapters in each VM we run for Geekzone, monitoring and other servers.

The idea is to load balance, but obviously there's no automatic failover like the one NIC Teaming would provide (not without manually changing DNS, then disabling NIC, etc).

From observation in the last month since we enabled the second NIC it seems performance has been marginally better and traffic seems equally balanced between IP addresses.

Apart from the obvious automatic failover/resiliency of NIC teaming, is anyone using it and seeing better performance than just two NICs with two IP addresses?

Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

1 | 2

8279 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 585

Trusted

#729010 8-Dec-2012 15:25

Sounds like the NIC being used will be getting picked by DNS round robin when accessed by server name so there's ~50/50 chance of NIC 1 being used vs NIC 2.

If this is the case than each individual connection/transfer would probably be limited to the speed of the individual NIC being used.

With could be higher throughput on a single connection/transfer as both NIC's could be used simultaneously, howeve rwould only be noticeable if the other end could handle the higher throughout of course.

NIC teaming is native in Windows Server 2012, time to upgrade!

kiwirock

694 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 141

#729021 8-Dec-2012 16:17

This is only native in Windows server environments from 2012?

I remember reading some stuff to do with bonding in Linux years ago. No I'm not a a genuine Liunx geek, but I'm surprised it's only been an option for Windows 'til now.

paulspain

417 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 25

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#729034 8-Dec-2012 17:08

There would be a performance benefit you could take advantage of if you're flooding the capacity of a single NIC.

For instance if you have more than 1Gb/s connectivity available and you're utilising 100% of the bandwidth of a single 1Gb/s NIC then utilising a 2nd NIC would give you up to 2Gb/s combined bandwidth.

networkn

Networkn
32862 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 15453

ID Verified

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#729039 8-Dec-2012 17:20

paulspain: There would be a performance benefit you could take advantage of if you're flooding the capacity of a single NIC.

For instance if you have more than 1Gb/s connectivity available and you're utilising 100% of the bandwidth of a single 1Gb/s NIC then utilising a 2nd NIC would give you up to 2Gb/s combined bandwidth.

Depends on your definition of 2Gbps, as I understand the port aggregation doesn't make it a single 2Gbps link, but rather 1Gbps for send and another 1Gbps for receive, plus with only 1 upstream 1Gbps connection (presumably), it's unlikely they would notice a significant change.

Zeon

3926 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 759

Trusted

#729050 8-Dec-2012 17:57

There are a few options for bonding, we run 802.3ad between our switches and it works fine. As mentioned it won't benefit a single data stream (ie TCP) but will help multiple connections which you will have. However I can't believe Geekzone has more than 1gbps of traffic?

Usually its set on the driver for the NIC itself e.g. if you have Intel you can setup NIC via the advanced properties page. Best to make sure your iLo is working in case you muck something up! Also remember the switch you are plugging into will also need this configured and would need a 10gbps uplink to provide any benefit.

Speedtest 2019-10-14

freitasm

BDFL - Memuneh
80646 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41030

Administrator

ID Verified

Trusted

Geekzone

Lifetime subscriber

#729079 8-Dec-2012 19:57

kiwirock: This is only native in Windows server environments from 2012?

Correct. Until now if you wanted this feature then both NIC had to be from the same vendor and obviously have OEM drivers and software supporting it.

The problem with some bonding (for example the HP NIC on the DL servers) is that while all NIC will receive traffic, outboind traffic goes only through one (or is it the other way around)?

Anyway, not very efficient, mainly used for network redundancy/automatic failover.

I am curious to see how this works on Windows Server 2012.

Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

HP

Shop now for HP laptops and other devices (affiliate link).

vulcannz

436 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 136
Inactive user

#730616 11-Dec-2012 16:32

freitasm:
The problem with some bonding (for example the HP NIC on the DL servers) is that while all NIC will receive traffic, outboind traffic goes only through one (or is it the other way around)?

Anyway, not very efficient, mainly used for network redundancy/automatic failover.

I am curious to see how this works on Windows Server 2012.

Not true. It does aggregate traffic, though it will rely heavily on what the supporting switch is going to provision. Some switches are built better than others. I've seen quad NIC's squeeze every last bit of bandwidth out of 4 x 1Gb connections.

browned

636 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 36

#731907 13-Dec-2012 11:20

We have HP servers and an HP core switch and with the switch assisted load balancing on the HP servers and trunking on the core switch we can see both NIC's sending and receiving data, but of course it always favours one nic more than the other.

freitasm

BDFL - Memuneh
80646 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41030

Administrator

ID Verified

Trusted

Geekzone

Lifetime subscriber

#731910 13-Dec-2012 11:21

Well, here we go then. Just got word our Windows Server 2012 software is out of the door, so will start work on a Geekzone migration to Server 2012 as soon as it is here. I will probably opt for OS-based NIC teaming from here.

Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

tonyhughes

Hawkes Bay
8476 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6

Retired Mod

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#731934 13-Dec-2012 11:29

As per Paul Spain... if your existing network connections are getting totally satchmoed, then cool, team away till the cows come home.

I suspect that primarily doing what the Geekzone does, that simple redundant NICs would be the best option.

Unless teaming can auto-fallback to a one-NIC deal, should one of the NICs fail. In which case, go for gold my son.

You realise that now this has been raised in public, a NIC will surely fail in the next several weeks...

:-P

freitasm

BDFL - Memuneh
80646 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41030

Administrator

ID Verified

Trusted

Geekzone

Lifetime subscriber

#732814 14-Dec-2012 22:37

It looks like now I have the tools to start working in our update...

Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

Samsung

Shop now on Samsung phones, tablets, TVs and more (affiliate link).

Ragnor

8279 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 585

Trusted

#732832 15-Dec-2012 02:08

Nice!

vulcannz

436 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 136
Inactive user

#732935 15-Dec-2012 16:24

freitasm: Well, here we go then. Just got word our Windows Server 2012 software is out of the door, so will start work on a Geekzone migration to Server 2012 as soon as it is here. I will probably opt for OS-based NIC teaming from here.

I have no faith in MS to implement any kind of vaguely decent port aggregation capabilities in their OS tbh. Looking at the nasty mess they've made in the past.

You're better off buying a decent set of NICs with decent drivers. 3rd party drivers that do mature LACP are not hard to find.

Keep in mind you need to match it with a decent switch, some switches LACP can be atrocious.

plambrechtsen

1948 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 459
Inactive user

#732984 15-Dec-2012 21:47

vulcannz:
freitasm: Well, here we go then. Just got word our Windows Server 2012 software is out of the door, so will start work on a Geekzone migration to Server 2012 as soon as it is here. I will probably opt for OS-based NIC teaming from here.

I have no faith in MS to implement any kind of vaguely decent port aggregation capabilities in their OS tbh. Looking at the nasty mess they've made in the past.

You're better off buying a decent set of NICs with decent drivers. 3rd party drivers that do mature LACP are not hard to find.

Keep in mind you need to match it with a decent switch, some switches LACP can be atrocious.

This is quite important too.. does your hosting provider (datacom?) support bonded nics, either LACP or 802.ad depending on what you're talking to... And then what is the speed of the core switch you're connecting to (hopefully 10GB or something to make the upgrade past 1GB worth it).

I also have to agree that buying the 3rd party nic drivers is normally well worth it... And something I highly recommend (as long as they work :)

freitasm

BDFL - Memuneh
80646 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41030

Administrator

ID Verified

Trusted

Geekzone

Lifetime subscriber

#732987 15-Dec-2012 22:04

I could have bonded NICs now as the hardware is supplied by HP and have the software for this already in the drivers and configuration tools...

Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

1 | 2