Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


226 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 10


Topic # 150814 4-Aug-2014 12:10
One person supports this post
Send private message

A heads up for anyone using a Synology NAS:

https://twitter.com/MikeEvangelist/status/495970097497128960

Looks like there's now a version of Cryptolocker specifically targetting Synology NASes - and you just have to have the web features enabled on your NAS to get potentially hit...

 

 


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Amanzi
878 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 91

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1101667 4-Aug-2014 12:43
Send private message

Scary stuff. From what I gather, if you get infected with Cryptolocker you only have two options: 1. pay the ransom and hope it works; or 2. restore your files from backup. Hard to tell from that Twitter thread how the NAS got infected?

BDFL - Memuneh
61323 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12066

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1101668 4-Aug-2014 12:43
4 people support this post
Send private message
1245 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 137


  Reply # 1101674 4-Aug-2014 12:48
Send private message

I own a couple of Synology NAS boxes ( back in the DSM 1.x and 2.x days) and found the software and documentation to be shoddy. Doesn't surprise me if these things are happening. I'm still using the NAS boxes as they are feature packed



226 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 10


  Reply # 1101676 4-Aug-2014 12:59
Send private message

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8128521 suggests there's some possible holes in the LAMP stack implementation... in https://twitter.com/MikeEvangelist/status/496025753721790464 he's said that he has AFP and SMB exposed to the net too.

BDFL - Memuneh
61323 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12066

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber



226 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 10




226 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 10


  Reply # 1101681 4-Aug-2014 13:02
Send private message

freitasm: Well, there you go. SMB and AFP exposed. *sigh*




Not exactly the brightest of moves, that...

Amanzi
878 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 91

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1101685 4-Aug-2014 13:06
Send private message

fastmikey:
freitasm: Well, there you go. SMB and AFP exposed. *sigh*




Not exactly the brightest of moves, that...


I don't understand how someone could have accidentally done this? And surely he wouldn't have configured his router/firewall/modem to explicitly allow connections from the internet to get to his NAS on those ports? Doesn't make sense to me.



226 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 10


  Reply # 1101699 4-Aug-2014 13:35
Send private message

amanzi:
fastmikey:
freitasm: Well, there you go. SMB and AFP exposed. *sigh*




Not exactly the brightest of moves, that...


I don't understand how someone could have accidentally done this? And surely he wouldn't have configured his router/firewall/modem to explicitly allow connections from the internet to get to his NAS on those ports? Doesn't make sense to me.


Why you would configure like that I can't explain, short of sheer laziness. However, looking at some of the commentary, it looks more likely that the vulnerability is in the web interface - and apparently it's not uncommon to have that forwarded (port 5000/5001).

 

DSM 4.3-3827 Update 4

 

(2014/6/25)

 

Change Log

 

     

  1. Updated OpenSSL to version 1.0.1h to address several severe security issues. (CVE-2014-0224, CVE-2014-0221, CVE-2014-0195, CVE-2014-0198, CVE-2010-5298, and CVE-2014-3470)
  2. Fixed a security issue that allows attackers to avoid checking mechanism and execute unintended commands via Web script.

 


may well point to what's being exploited on unpatched systems.

As I don't have any affected systems (yet, God willing!) however I can't speak with any certainty...

gjm

747 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 91


  Reply # 1101703 4-Aug-2014 13:51
2 people support this post
Send private message

Only synology service I expose to the internet is VPN. I just dont know why you would open everything else up like that




[Amstrad CPC 6128: 128k Memory: 3 inch floppy drive: Colour Screen]

238 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 16


  Reply # 1101710 4-Aug-2014 14:02
Send private message

SMB is almost useless over the internet anyway as it would be very slow (I've tried it - SMB tends to be very chatty).

The only way to get to my NAS's web is by going through my router's SSH server first.

1849 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 675

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1101745 4-Aug-2014 15:01
Send private message

gjm: Only synology service I expose to the internet is VPN. I just dont know why you would open everything else up like that


Out of curiosity what are you using the VPN connection for?

To connect to your NAS from the web or to connect your NAS to an external VPN?

I was curious as to whether I could use my 412+ VPN to connect to Netflix and then connect a Roku to NAS client and get Netflix..

? A.



4248 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2491

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1101814 4-Aug-2014 15:52
Send private message

Having read this thread I have updated the DSM (operating system) firmware on my Synology DS1813+.
At the end of the install I was offered "QuickConnect" software which I declined, as well as all the other optional extras.
"QuickConnect lets you access your Synology DS1813+ anywhere"
I presume it is the "QuickConnect" software that is vulnerable to Synolocker.




Sideface


Meow
7902 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3929

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1101816 4-Aug-2014 15:52
Send private message

I have a few of these scattered around to backup my mine and my flatmates servers,

One of our sites got pwned - really not good:





Amanzi
878 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 91

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1101820 4-Aug-2014 15:56
Send private message

michaelmurfy: One of our sites got pwned - really not good:


I'm curious to know what your plan is to fix it? I'm interested to see if there's an alternative to paying the ransom or relying on backups.

 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.