Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Tia

Tia

9 posts

Wannabe Geek


#261597 5-Dec-2019 17:10
Send private message

We have a small Access database that needs to be updated by several people.  It is not a business situation with a server so without being able to share the database, all the information has to be passed to one person.

 

What alternative databases systems would you recommend?  Cost is an issue.

 

Thank you.


Create new topic
elpenguino
3576 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2938


  #2368915 5-Dec-2019 17:26
Send private message

There's no reason, when built appropriately, Access cannot have multiple users.

 

OTOH you can migrate your database (backend ) from Access to MS SQL and use the low end version for free (limited to 2 GB).

 

If you really want a cloud alternative <I think> from there you can migrate to Azure.





Most of the posters in this thread are just like chimpanzees on MDMA, full of feelings of bonhomie, joy, and optimism. Fred99 8/4/21




cyril7
9073 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2499

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #2368982 5-Dec-2019 18:26
Send private message

To follow on from elpenguino's suggestion, an Azure MSsql Instance may be a little pricey, but as I don't know you use, case or circumstance so hard to say.

But another option is to export it to MYSQL or mongodb and run an instance on a small Linux machine in a vps service like digital ocean or vultr.

Cyril

Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.