Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




507 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 31


Topic # 112277 3-Dec-2012 16:10
Send private message

If so, why/how?

If not why not?

Interested in robust debate.

Had the forced split been in name only?




 


The force is strong with this one!

Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
25966 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5649

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 726309 3-Dec-2012 16:48
Send private message

I'd love to debate your question but I don't understand it.

42 posts

Geek

Trusted

  Reply # 726312 3-Dec-2012 16:52
Send private message

Might help if you elaborated a bit on your own POV and why you think it's a good debate to have? Ta




@richirvine
@telecomnz


 
 
 
 




507 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 31


  Reply # 726313 3-Dec-2012 16:52
Send private message

I disagree.  You clearly have a better grasp of IT than most Laughing




 


The force is strong with this one!

2503 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 461


  Reply # 726317 3-Dec-2012 16:59
Send private message

Perhaps you should start by saying what you think Telecom is....

Do you understand what regulations are now in place and what Telecom (as a company) actually is?




Nothing is impossible for the man who doesn't have to do it himself - A. H. Weiler

BDFL - Memuneh
59626 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10781

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 726319 3-Dec-2012 17:01
Send private message

rossmnz: I disagree.  You clearly have a better grasp of IT than most Laughing


Please start telling us YOUR view then we can say YES/NO to it.





13539 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1648


  Reply # 726326 3-Dec-2012 17:06
Send private message

Simply put, no I don't think it does, especially since they separated. There is no requirement to use telecom these days, and the telcom market is now very competitive. 
However I think they are monopolies/duopolies in other areas of the NZ economy that are cuasing problems with high prices, such as our building sector, supermarkets, pay tv/media content etc. Comes with NZ being a small population in a remote region of the world.

BDFL - Memuneh
59626 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10781

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 726327 3-Dec-2012 17:08
Send private message

Ok, biting...

No, there's no monopoly. They are not the larger mobile operator around, they don't provide UFB while others do, they don't set prices for local loop.

So, what's your point?





Fully Operational
3343 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1088

Trusted
Vocus
Subscriber

  Reply # 726334 3-Dec-2012 17:21
Send private message

I'd say the split has done a lot for competition, and there no longer exists any Telecom "monopoly" or enduring competitive advantage in the market for telephone/internet services.

Telecom still have the advantage of having started out with most of the customers, but the barriers to entry in terms of infrastructure investment have been largely removed by enforcing set wholesale pricing for connections (ie. Chorus provided POTS/ADSL), as evidenced by the number of small telcos/ISPs that have popped up in recent years.  The other major hurdle was to allow unbundling - and the success of this is evident from the number of telco/ISP's offering services from their own network.

Does that answer your question?

6051 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 940

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 726336 3-Dec-2012 17:24
Send private message

Doesn't Telecom Wholesale still have a "monopoly" for customers served from cabinets and smaller exchanges? I know that ISPs are able to install their own gear but the impression I got is that it's not cost-effective.

25966 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5649

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 726344 3-Dec-2012 17:30
Send private message

Behodar: Doesn't Telecom Wholesale still have a "monopoly" for customers served from cabinets and smaller exchanges? I know that ISPs are able to install their own gear but the impression I got is that it's not cost-effective.


It's not cost effective purely because of the small number of customers. A typical cabinet will serve ~288 premises, if you've got 10% of the market that's 28 customers. Factor in the cost of a ISAM/DSAM/MSAN and the cost of regulated backhaul (which is a rip off but the Commerce Commission set the pricing) and it's very obvious why this makes no sence if you're a business wanting to make a profit.

3272 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1057

Subscriber

  Reply # 726358 3-Dec-2012 18:02
Send private message

sbiddle:
Behodar: Doesn't Telecom Wholesale still have a "monopoly" for customers served from cabinets and smaller exchanges? I know that ISPs are able to install their own gear but the impression I got is that it's not cost-effective.


It's not cost effective purely because of the small number of customers. A typical cabinet will serve ~288 premises, if you've got 10% of the market that's 28 customers. Factor in the cost of a ISAM/DSAM/MSAN and the cost of regulated backhaul (which is a rip off but the Commerce Commission set the pricing) and it's very obvious why this makes no sence if you're a business wanting to make a profit.


Doesn't Chorus own that gear? I thought Telecom Wholesale was no more. I also thought all providers can serve their customers out of a cabinet for the same price.

BDFL - Memuneh
59626 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10781

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

19282 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2600
Inactive user


  Reply # 726367 3-Dec-2012 18:24
Send private message

I wish people would do a little bit of research before asking questions like this

25966 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5649

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 726375 3-Dec-2012 18:39
Send private message

chevrolux:
sbiddle:
Behodar: Doesn't Telecom Wholesale still have a "monopoly" for customers served from cabinets and smaller exchanges? I know that ISPs are able to install their own gear but the impression I got is that it's not cost-effective.


It's not cost effective purely because of the small number of customers. A typical cabinet will serve ~288 premises, if you've got 10% of the market that's 28 customers. Factor in the cost of a ISAM/DSAM/MSAN and the cost of regulated backhaul (which is a rip off but the Commerce Commission set the pricing) and it's very obvious why this makes no sence if you're a business wanting to make a profit.


Doesn't Chorus own that gear? I thought Telecom Wholesale was no more. I also thought all providers can serve their customers out of a cabinet for the same price.


They can do. But the business case will never ever stack up.

if you look at my figures above the wholesale cost of the UCLL copper, space in the cabinet, and backhaul could easily cost somewhere in the vicinity of $1500 - $2000 per month depending on your backbaul requirements. These prices are fully regulated by the Commerce Commisson.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realise if you're paying $53 per month in wholesale costs (let alone the cost of the hardware), assuming you can get 28 customers, that there is no margin when at that price you can just use wholesale UBA.

6051 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 940

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 726377 3-Dec-2012 18:43
Send private message

chevrolux: Doesn't Chorus own that gear? I thought Telecom Wholesale was no more.


freitasm: That's Chorus. There's no Telecom Wholesale.

Telecom Wholesale seems to still exist (either that or someone forgot to take their website down!) but after looking around it does look like the gear moved across to Chorus. I didn't realise that that had happened and I stand corrected.

 1 | 2
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Fujifilm X beats its best with new top of the range, high-performance camera
Posted 24-Feb-2018 14:05


One million kiwis affected by cybercrime
Posted 24-Feb-2018 13:58


New Zealanders want to engage with government online and via mobile apps
Posted 24-Feb-2018 13:56


Samsung launches Samsung Max
Posted 24-Feb-2018 13:52


CPTPP text and National Interest Analysis released for public scrutiny
Posted 21-Feb-2018 19:43


Foodstuffs to trial digitised shopping trolleys
Posted 21-Feb-2018 18:27


2018: The year of zero-login, smart cars & the biometrics of things
Posted 21-Feb-2018 18:25


Intel reimagines data centre storage with new 3D NAND SSDs
Posted 16-Feb-2018 15:21


Ground-breaking business programme begins in Hamilton
Posted 16-Feb-2018 10:18


Government to continue search for first Chief Technology Officer
Posted 12-Feb-2018 20:30


Time to take Appleā€™s iPad Pro seriously
Posted 12-Feb-2018 16:54


New Fujifilm X-A5 brings selfie features to mirrorless camera
Posted 9-Feb-2018 09:12


D-Link ANZ expands connected smart home with new HD Wi-Fi cameras
Posted 9-Feb-2018 09:01


Dragon Professional for Mac V6: Near perfect dictation
Posted 9-Feb-2018 08:26


OPPO announces R11s with claims to be the picture perfect smartphone
Posted 2-Feb-2018 13:28



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.