Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




1190 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 402


Topic # 139136 29-Jan-2014 01:37
One person supports this post
Send private message

The Labour Party has put forward a possible solution to force multi-national corporations to pay more tax – ban them from the internet.

 

It says the Government should first talk with companies like Facebook, but if that doesn't work it is important to have a backup, something Labour is describing as a credible threat.

 

Facebook is the world's largest social network by far, but pays little tax here in New Zealand.

 

"The Government should always have in its back pocket the ability to ban websites," says Labour revenue spokesman David Clark.

 

http://www.3news.co.nz/Labour-threatens-Facebook-ban-over-tax-issue/tabid/1607/articleID/330056/Default.aspx#ixzz2rhE2ZCrK


This is so stupid I don't know where to begin.

View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
6428 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1564


  Reply # 976375 29-Jan-2014 01:42
One person supports this post
Send private message

seems about as likely as the idea of 'banning' geoblocking.

'That VDSL Cat'
6062 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1127

Trusted
Spark
Subscriber

  Reply # 976376 29-Jan-2014 02:06
Send private message

i cant help but laugh about it..

oh the wonders i miss out of not watching the news..




#include <std_disclaimer>

 

Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.


 
 
 
 


1241 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 134


  Reply # 976387 29-Jan-2014 07:06
Send private message

They say government is 5 years behind reality rings true. I admire the values the party has but gosh they have some really silly ideas in their approach.

Really every single MP that wishes to comment about IT should take a crash course on networking. There are places where FaceBook is actually banned and people get around it

3599 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1743

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 976388 29-Jan-2014 07:09
8 people support this post
Send private message

To be fair, Labour need the extra cash to pay people to pop out more kids.




Whatifthespacekeyhadneverbeeninvented?


2995 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 829

Subscriber

  Reply # 976392 29-Jan-2014 07:22
One person supports this post
Send private message

Guess we might as well move to China then.

This is why the DIA filter is a bad thing. Im glad Snap don't use it.

BDFL - Memuneh
58131 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9649

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Subscriber

  Reply # 976394 29-Jan-2014 07:31
4 people support this post
Send private message

Note that the quote is "The Government should always have in its back pocket the ability to ban websites,"

It doesn't say "only in case of tax evasion."

Welcome to your new Labour Overlords, who will one day cull dissent by blocking sites and services. Oh sure, some folks will say it will never happen. Right.




Departed
10054 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4210

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 976396 29-Jan-2014 07:32
One person supports this post
Send private message

I agree with the move to try an enforce tax compliance on corporations, Google is another that is not paying its share.

A ban would be meaningless to these corporations we are just a mere rounding error on their revenue returns.




Mike
IT Management Consultant, Freelance money spender
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


BDFL - Memuneh
58131 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9649

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Subscriber

  Reply # 976397 29-Jan-2014 07:33
Send private message

Exactly. They have to find another way of enforcing tax code/regulations.




Departed
10054 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4210

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 976398 29-Jan-2014 07:35
Send private message

freitasm: Note that the quote is "The Government should always have in its back pocket the ability to ban websites,"

It doesn't say "only in case of tax evasion."

Welcome to your new Labour Overlords, who will one day cull dissent by blocking sites and services. Oh sure, some folks will say it will never happen. Right.


Hmmm if it smells like FUD it quite often is FUD 😉😉;-)




Mike
IT Management Consultant, Freelance money spender
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


BDFL - Memuneh
58131 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9649

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Subscriber

  Reply # 976400 29-Jan-2014 07:37
Send private message

One thing is FUD. Another thing is FUD.

You rather wait and see things happening instead of just saying "folks, don't go down that lane, it's hard to come back later"?








Departed
10054 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4210

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 976401 29-Jan-2014 07:42
Send private message

freitasm: One thing is FUD. Another thing is FUD.

You rather wait and see things happening instead of just saying "folks, don't go down that lane, it's hard to come back later"?






The lawful closure of illegal activity on the internet should always be a sanction available.




Mike
IT Management Consultant, Freelance money spender
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


BDFL - Memuneh
58131 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9649

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Subscriber

  Reply # 976402 29-Jan-2014 07:46
One person supports this post
Send private message

Here is where you are wrong. These site's online activities are not illegal.

They are not doing tax evasion. They have very good accountants that know that by using companies in some places they can pay less tax. Legally.

Deal with it. It's not illegal. The government has a loophole in the tax system. Get the MPs to close it with a new reformed tax law. But don't come with crap about closing sites because it can be used for other things.




Departed
10054 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4210

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 976407 29-Jan-2014 07:57
Send private message

freitasm: Here is where you are wrong. These site's online activities are not illegal.

They are not doing tax evasion. They have very good accountants that know that by using companies in some places they can pay less tax. Legally.

Deal with it. It's not illegal. The government has a loophole in the tax system. Get the MPs to close it with a new reformed tax law. But don't come with crap about closing sites because it can be used for other things.


I was not referring to these sites, I was referring to non specific sites in response to your post re banning on the internet.

Clearly Googles and Facebooks activity is not illegal. I am saying that as with any part of society the legsl closure of illegal activity is a sanction the judiciary should have at its disposal.




Mike
IT Management Consultant, Freelance money spender
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


6428 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1564


  Reply # 976409 29-Jan-2014 08:15
Send private message

KiwiNZ:
freitasm: Here is where you are wrong. These site's online activities are not illegal.

They are not doing tax evasion. They have very good accountants that know that by using companies in some places they can pay less tax. Legally.

Deal with it. It's not illegal. The government has a loophole in the tax system. Get the MPs to close it with a new reformed tax law. But don't come with crap about closing sites because it can be used for other things.


I was not referring to these sites, I was referring to non specific sites in response to your post re banning on the internet.

Clearly Googles and Facebooks activity is not illegal. I am saying that as with any part of society the legsl closure of illegal activity is a sanction the judiciary should have at its disposal.


Sounds nice in theory, but even aside from the 'slippery slope' argument there is also the problem that it is virtually impossible in practice to have a real impact

For a start, The Nz government has no jurisdiction to shut down websites hosted in other countries.

They could, in theory, get ISPs to filter out websites such as pirate bay, as they try in the uk, but actually getting that to happen will cost millions AND it won't work because anybody can use a VPN to get around any sort of ISP filtering.

gzt

8699 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1114


  Reply # 976422 29-Jan-2014 08:32
Send private message

Blocking is a really stupid idea, and not needed in this case anyway. Not that facebook would really care. The labour guy started backpedalling hours if not minutes after making that statement. Realistically this kind of thing is a constant threat from all mainstream political parties.

 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

NotPetya ransomware attack, New Zealand view
Posted 28-Jun-2017 15:07


Security concerns reach new peak, Unisys Security Index
Posted 27-Jun-2017 14:11


Behind Spark’s slow-burn 4.5G plan
Posted 26-Jun-2017 16:23


Red Hat unveils production-ready open source hyperconverged infrastructure
Posted 23-Jun-2017 22:10


Whatever ailed Vodafone broadband … seems to be fixed
Posted 23-Jun-2017 14:10


VMware NSX Meets Stringent Government Security Standards with Common Criteria Certification
Posted 22-Jun-2017 19:05


Brother launches next-generation colour laser printers and all-in- ones for business
Posted 22-Jun-2017 18:56


Intel and IOC announce partnership
Posted 22-Jun-2017 18:50


Samsung Galaxy Tab S3: Best Android tablet
Posted 21-Jun-2017 12:05


Wellington-based company helping secure Microsoft browsers
Posted 20-Jun-2017 20:51


Endace delivers high performance with new 1/10/40 Gbps packet capture card
Posted 20-Jun-2017 20:50


You can now integrate SMX security into Microsoft Office 365, Google and other cloud email platforms
Posted 20-Jun-2017 20:47


Ravensdown launches new decision-making tool HawkEye
Posted 19-Jun-2017 15:38


Spark planning to take on direct management of all consumer stores
Posted 19-Jun-2017 10:03


Qrious acquires Ubiquity
Posted 14-Jun-2017 12:21



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.