Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 
mrgsm021

1538 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 310

ID Verified
Trusted

  #2520796 10-Jul-2020 14:35
Send private message

My additional thought is if Apple was really concerned about the environment and e-waste, then they should have introduced USB Type C on iPhones a long time ago, rather than sticking with lightning port, this also in turn creates unnecessary waste on the lightning cables.




MikeB4
MikeB4
18775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12766

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #2520798 10-Jul-2020 14:44
Send private message

mrgsm021:

 

My additional thought is if Apple was really concerned about the environment and e-waste, then they should have introduced USB Type C on iPhones a long time ago, rather than sticking with lightning port, this also in turn creates unnecessary waste on the lightning cables.

 

 

Or another view is that Apple buyers have vested a lot in lightening accessories and so have many of the suppliers that Apple felt a sudden change to USB-C would have dumped a lot of e-waste at the landfills and irked a lot of their customers and suppliers. 





Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.


dafman
4054 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2652

Trusted

  #2520808 10-Jul-2020 15:06
Send private message

MikeB4:

 

mrgsm021:

 

My additional thought is if Apple was really concerned about the environment and e-waste, then they should have introduced USB Type C on iPhones a long time ago, rather than sticking with lightning port, this also in turn creates unnecessary waste on the lightning cables.

 

 

Or another view is that Apple buyers have vested a lot in lightening accessories and so have many of the suppliers that Apple felt a sudden change to USB-C would have dumped a lot of e-waste at the landfills and irked a lot of their customers and suppliers. 

 

 

Didn't seem to trouble Apple last time.




richms
29099 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10214

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2520811 10-Jul-2020 15:08
Send private message

I thought that is the reason they bundled an adapter cable in some markets with phones? 





Richard rich.ms

wellygary
8810 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5287


  #2520843 10-Jul-2020 16:10
Send private message

mrgsm021:

 

My additional thought is if Apple was really concerned about the environment and e-waste,

 

 

This has little to do with E-waste, its all about accountants... If they remove the charge from the box, they can make the box much thinner, ( potentially half as thin) , that's potentially up to twice and many phones on a pallet,- meaning much more $ per metric metre of shipping space. - let along cutting out the cost of a charging brick is ( although it will be minimal)

 

yeah, they will talk about waste and the environment, but if it saves them $$$ It goes to the head of the class

 

 


JaseNZ
2576 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1489

ID Verified
Lifetime subscriber

  #2520925 10-Jul-2020 19:47
Send private message

On the would not bother me band wagon, wireless charges up the wazoo as well as bricks and cables.





Ding Ding Ding Ding Ding : Ice cream man , Ice cream man


1 | 2 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.