![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
It's only an objective discussion if you have at least some of the facts straight.
If you spout nonsense, and you know which bits, it's trolling.
Just don't bother, tdgeek, we've been around this circle before..
IIRC, you accused me of it when I posted something in an apple thread.
Since then, I stay away from apple threads... easy fixed
It's like preaching Christianity to Buddhists, we're not interested, especially when it's all made up...
You like apple products, we understand, and that's fine... everyone makes their choices.
tdgeek: Leaving topic.
tdgeek: Apple began the GUI, it began the smartphone, so it has taken action when required.
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync | Backblaze backup
freitasm:tdgeek: Apple began the GUI, it began the smartphone, so it has taken action when required.
Are you serious about this statement, or it is as others claim, just an attempt at trolling?
Apple did not invent the smartphone. There were smartphones before the iPhone - the Palm Treo, Microsoft Pocket PC Phone Edition, Microsoft Smartphone, Symbian... Those were all smartphones, with true development frameworks, native code and more. And they were in the market years before Apple announced the iPhone.
http://www.geekzone.co.nz/smartdevices.asp for a list of original Microsoft Pocket PC Phone Edition and Microsoft Smartphone devices - dating from early 2001 through the years.
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync | Backblaze backup
All comments are my own opinion, and not that of my employer unless explicitly stated.
lokhor: I am not an Apple fan but Samsung trying to block their devices is pretty scummy and stooping to their level. They should compete at a product level.
All comments are my own opinion, and not that of my employer unless explicitly stated.
oxnsox: So how would you change the patent laws to prevent this sort of thing?
And please understand this isn't a request to go legal postal... I'm merely thinking whats a 21st century type solution that still lets other players make competitive products whilst still protecting valid IP innovations.
(I mean we don't seem to have this same problem in the car market, yet they're all generically very, very similar apart from their badges)
.............................................................
simple logic.
tdgeek:SteveON: About time Apple got a taste of their own medicine... I seem to remember Apple suing Microsoft for countless things... for example http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Computer,_Inc._v._Microsoft_Corporation
It's about time the digital patient system was reworked.
I should have studied IP law.
Own medicine???? I guess your biased. Whether its Apple, Microsoft or whoever, if a company invents or creates an idea or device first, they have copyright, in terms of a patent. Apple began the GUI, it began the smartphone, so it has taken action when required. The same applies if Apple used something that is held as patent by Microsoft or Samsung or whoever. Samsung says Apple is using its wifi technology, so fine, they will resolve that in civil court. Thats business.
These issues happen in business, its not an Apple thing. Its business.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |