Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




2074 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 961

Trusted
Subscriber

Topic # 150868 6-Aug-2014 09:32
Send private message

The LG G3 is a phone I have been very keen to see in the flesh since it was announced earlier this year.

I consider myself a resolution junkie - always favouring higher resolution screens for my mobile, tablet and laptops.

QHD seemed like an insane leap forward for a 5" screen - it had to be better than anything else on the market, right?

Well, I finally got my hands on the G3 at 2 Degrees yesterday. When comparing side by side with my Z2, the difference in screen appearance is so minimal, it's almost impossible to tell the difference. If pushed, I would say that the G3 even looked a little 'over-resoluted' (is there such a word?) - hard to describe, but a little bit like being short sighted and putting on glasses that are slightly too strong for your vision. The Z2 looked as sharp, but a little easier on the eye.

So, my question is - do we really need QHD screens in 5"devices, or is this a step too far to be of any practical use? Is the extra drain on battery and processor worth the ever-so-infinitesimal increase in resolution (which arguably doesn't improve in appearance from full HD)?

 

Create new topic
2064 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 486


  Reply # 1103107 6-Aug-2014 09:59
Send private message

I think it will be prevalent next generation, if they can get the battery drain under control I think there will be no real issue.  

 

 

 

Going to be funny seeing 1080P midrange devices next year though.

5444 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1547

Trusted

  Reply # 1103109 6-Aug-2014 09:59
Send private message

Isnt there a point where the human eye cant notice the difference without an electron microscope? i think we got that with the S4.

 
 
 
 


2064 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 486


  Reply # 1103113 6-Aug-2014 10:01
Send private message

TimA: Isnt there a point where the human eye cant notice the difference without an electron microscope? i think we got that with the S4.


Professional printers print at 600DPI, so I think you would want to be close to that.

See here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photo-quality_printing

2090 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 848


  Reply # 1103120 6-Aug-2014 10:18
One person supports this post
Send private message

I'm in two minds.

One one hand I love technology and progress.

On the other 4k on a 5" display seems utterly pointless.

how on earth do you drive 4k in 3d/graphics intensive situations.

824 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 543

Trusted

  Reply # 1103122 6-Aug-2014 10:20
Send private message

TimA: Isnt there a point where the human eye cant notice the difference without an electron microscope? i think we got that with the S4.


You say that now but once you've seen a S5 (or any top line 1080 smartphone) next to a QHD phone putting aside IPS vs AMOLED, you'll see just how good QHD looks.

Heres hoping they can sort the battery drain out by the time it's ready for me to replace my S5

1320 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 451

Trusted

  Reply # 1103123 6-Aug-2014 10:29

I'm all for higher resolutions - once the SoCs have caught up. Snapdragon 805 minimum for QHD methinks. Fingers crossed the Note 4 isn't two steps forward & one step back from the Note 3 as the G3 is to the G2.




Product Manager @ PB Tech

https://pbtech.co.nz/smartphones


5444 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1547

Trusted

  Reply # 1103124 6-Aug-2014 10:30
Send private message

Andib:
TimA: Isnt there a point where the human eye cant notice the difference without an electron microscope? i think we got that with the S4.


You say that now but once you've seen a S5 (or any top line 1080 smartphone) next to a QHD phone putting aside IPS vs AMOLED, you'll see just how good QHD looks.

Heres hoping they can sort the battery drain out by the time it's ready for me to replace my S5


Its funny in the advertisement. I am amazed my current screen looks Great too. Thanks for reminding me Samsung.

351 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 159


  Reply # 1103132 6-Aug-2014 10:58
3 people support this post
Send private message

To be honest OP you're asking the wrong people.

The question is why do the unwashed masses think they need QuadHD?

Or rather.. Why do marketing departments think QHD will sell better than advertising a 4 day battery life? 

483 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 17


  Reply # 1103135 6-Aug-2014 11:03
Send private message

yes it is.

4649 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 470

Trusted

  Reply # 1103143 6-Aug-2014 11:20
2 people support this post
Send private message

When the hardware can run QHD then I want it, I mirror my phone a lot and over the next couple of years as I update things to 4K I will have a use for the extra resolution (although not so much on the phone itself, even then). For right now too many compromises needed in the G3 to use that res.




Twitter: @nztechfreak
Blogs: HeadphoNZ.org


351 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 159


  Reply # 1103151 6-Aug-2014 11:34
Send private message

NZtechfreak: When the hardware can run QHD then I want it, I mirror my phone a lot and over the next couple of years as I update things to 4K I will have a use for the extra resolution (although not so much on the phone itself, even then). For right now too many compromises needed in the G3 to use that res.


Samsung have released the AMOLED QHD S5 LTE-A in Korea only, proving it's possible for it to be done right but the question remains whether it's worth it. 

Full review:
Anandtech review the QHD Galaxy S5

TL:DR version:
Battery life S5 QHD = 10 hours
(for comparison: iPhone 5, LG G2 = 10 hours)

Basemark overall = 1231
(For comparison: Nexus 5 = 1213)

Screen review:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/8258/evaluating-samsungs-qhd-amoled-displays






13451 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2275

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1103155 6-Aug-2014 11:45
One person supports this post
Send private message

Traditional photo printers are 250 - 300ppi, but 100ppi looks fine for enlargements. QHD is unnecessary IMHO, it will increase battery drain and costs unnecessarily.




AWS Certified Solution Architect Professional, Sysop Administrator Associate, and Developer Associate
TOGAF certified enterprise architect
Professional photographer


4649 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 470

Trusted

  Reply # 1103163 6-Aug-2014 11:48
Send private message

tehgerbil:
NZtechfreak: When the hardware can run QHD then I want it, I mirror my phone a lot and over the next couple of years as I update things to 4K I will have a use for the extra resolution (although not so much on the phone itself, even then). For right now too many compromises needed in the G3 to use that res.


Samsung have released the AMOLED QHD S5 LTE-A in Korea only, proving it's possible for it to be done right but the question remains whether it's worth it. 

Full review:
Anandtech review the QHD Galaxy S5

TL:DR version:
Battery life S5 QHD = 10 hours
(for comparison: iPhone 5, LG G2 = 10 hours)

Basemark overall = 1231
(For comparison: Nexus 5 = 1213)

Screen review:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/8258/evaluating-samsungs-qhd-amoled-displays


That pretty nice to see some of the compromises don't have to be done, but the SoCs still aren't up to pushing that resolution around for heavy lifting activities like emulation, so still not up to snuff for me. Thanks for the review link, will be interested to read that this evening after work.




Twitter: @nztechfreak
Blogs: HeadphoNZ.org


Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

New Zealand hits peak broadband data
Posted 18-Jan-2018 12:21


Amazon Echo devices coming to New Zealand early February 2018
Posted 18-Jan-2018 10:53


$3.74 million for new electric vehicles in New Zealand
Posted 17-Jan-2018 11:27


Nova 2i: Value, not excitement from Huawei
Posted 17-Jan-2018 09:02


Less news in Facebook News Feed revamp
Posted 15-Jan-2018 13:15


Australian Government contract awarded to Datacom Connect
Posted 11-Jan-2018 08:37


Why New Zealand needs a chief technology officer
Posted 6-Jan-2018 13:59


Amazon release Silk Browser and Firefox for Fire TV
Posted 21-Dec-2017 13:42


New Chief Technology Officer role created
Posted 19-Dec-2017 22:18


All I want for Christmas is a new EV
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:54


How clever is this: AI will create 2.3 million jobs by 2020
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:52


NOW to deploy SD-WAN to regional councils
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:46


Mobile market competition issues ComCom should watch
Posted 18-Dec-2017 10:52


New Zealand government to create digital advisory group
Posted 16-Dec-2017 08:47


Australia datum changes means whole country moving 1.8 metres north-east
Posted 16-Dec-2017 08:39



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.