![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
If this merger does ahead, this will be even more reason to avoid Skodafone...
and in all seriousness, I expect you will see more people jumping ship and moving to a Freeview, Netflix, Lightbox model...
DickDastardly:
If this merger does ahead, this will be even more reason to avoid Skodafone...
and in all seriousness, I expect you will see more people jumping ship and moving to a Freeview, Netflix, Lightbox model...
Sport. I doubt that VF/Sky will be allowed to offer preferential deals to VF users. I'd love to see if any others might band together to go after a new sport service?
That would be cats amongst the pigeons
Yep, it is sport that puts the kibosh on me ditching expensive SKY.
linw:
Yep, it is sport that puts the kibosh on me ditching expensive SKY.
Fanpass? I got Sky back as FP wasnt great, and the whole expereince and channel lineup and recording in one place just maks it much nicer. $50 deal helped too
wingbat45: Alright people, once this goes ahead (and assuming it will) what would we all expect to see?
New boxes?
New name?
New deals?
The ability of being able to choose channels?
Thoughts?
Will the ability to choose channels make it cheaper?
3/4s of the channels on SKY cost them next to nothing to show so why would ditching those mean you get a saving?
Though it would be interesting to see what the cost to watch something was if the cost was the rights costs divided by the number of viewers
High Court has granted a 3 day "stay" if the merger is approved.
"Spark regulatory affairs manager John Wesley-Smith said the stay would ensure all interested parties had a chance to make informed decisions on whether to seek a judicial review, if there was a decision to clear the merger.
"We and others believe the proposed merger will be bad for consumers – resulting in poorer choice and higher prices for consumers, especially when it comes to sports content. That was at the heart of our decision to take this court action,"
So Spark are inferring that if the merger went forward Spark and 2 degrees prices would go up, interesting. Going on from this, if Comm Comm decline the merger application will Spark and 2 degrees hold their prices at current levels.
MikeB4:"Spark regulatory affairs manager John Wesley-Smith said the stay would ensure all interested parties had a chance to make informed decisions on whether to seek a judicial review, if there was a decision to clear the merger.
"We and others believe the proposed merger will be bad for consumers – resulting in poorer choice and higher prices for consumers, especially when it comes to sports content. That was at the heart of our decision to take this court action,"
So Spark are inferring that if the merger went forward Spark and 2 degrees prices would go up, interesting. Going on from this, if Comm Comm decline the merger application will Spark and 2 degrees hold their prices at current levels.
tdgeek:MikeB4:
"Spark regulatory affairs manager John Wesley-Smith said the stay would ensure all interested parties had a chance to make informed decisions on whether to seek a judicial review, if there was a decision to clear the merger.
"We and others believe the proposed merger will be bad for consumers – resulting in poorer choice and higher prices for consumers, especially when it comes to sports content. That was at the heart of our decision to take this court action,"
So Spark are inferring that if the merger went forward Spark and 2 degrees prices would go up, interesting. Going on from this, if Comm Comm decline the merger application will Spark and 2 degrees hold their prices at current levels.
They didn't say that, they said higher prices to consumers especially when it comes to sport. Which indicates non Voda users will pay more for Sky services than Voda customers using Sky services
But dont nonVoda users pay more for Sky than Voda customers already?
And dont non-Spark users pay more for Lightbox than Spark users?
Sixth Labour Government - "Vision without Execution is just Hallucination"
ockel:
tdgeek:MikeB4:
"Spark regulatory affairs manager John Wesley-Smith said the stay would ensure all interested parties had a chance to make informed decisions on whether to seek a judicial review, if there was a decision to clear the merger.
"We and others believe the proposed merger will be bad for consumers – resulting in poorer choice and higher prices for consumers, especially when it comes to sports content. That was at the heart of our decision to take this court action,"
So Spark are inferring that if the merger went forward Spark and 2 degrees prices would go up, interesting. Going on from this, if Comm Comm decline the merger application will Spark and 2 degrees hold their prices at current levels.
They didn't say that, they said higher prices to consumers especially when it comes to sport. Which indicates non Voda users will pay more for Sky services than Voda customers using Sky services
But dont nonVoda users pay more for Sky than Voda customers already?
And dont non-Spark users pay more for Lightbox than Spark users?
Hard to dispute that
wingbat45:
macuser:
Even longer hold times! (hehehe)
my PB is 3.5 hrs to vodafone for a PASSWORD RESET of all things
Odd, as the old Telstra Clear system appears to have the password stored in plain text (As evidenced by the CSR reading back my password to me. *sigh*
Not forgetting potentially another billing system for customers to contend with ...
“We’ve arranged a society based on science and technology, in which nobody understands anything about science technology. Carl Sagan 1996
Beaten to it!
I would doubt it, ComCom is ComCom, if it went judicial, they would need to seek expert advice. From who? ComCom.
Be interesting to see why. The only way I can see why is that they felt that there would be a heavy bias to Voda users, for what is a 800,000 national customerbase, and that there is more to it than just sharing costs
From Sky CEO
"One way or another you are going to see a lot more business between ourselves and all of the telecommunications players.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |